References
- Back, Kurt W. “Frankenstein and Brave New World: Two Cautionary Myths on the Boundaries of Science.” History of European Ideas, vol. 1, 1995, pp. 327–332. DOI: 10.1016/0191-6599(95)92959-X
- Badii, Iene, Guardiola, Elena, & Baños, Joseph-E. “Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus: A Classic Novel to Stimulate the Analysis of Complex Contemporary Issues in Biomedical Sciences.” BMC Med Ethics, vol. 22, no. 17, 2021, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00586-7
- Barr, Jean, and Steele, Tom. “Revaluing the Enlightenment: Reason and Imagination.” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 4, 2003, pp. 505–515. DOI: 10.1080/1356251032000117599
- Baudrillard, Jean. In the shadow of the silent majorities or the end of the social. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2007.
- Baudrillard, Jean. Seduction. (B. Singer, Trans.). New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2007.
- Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2020.
- Baudrillard, Jean. The Mirror of Production. (M. Poster, Trans.). New York: Verso, 2019.
- Binney, Mathew. “Edmund Burke’s Sublime Cosmopolitan Aesthetic.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, vol. 53, no. 3, 2013, pp. 643–66. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/24510549 . Accessed 27 Apr. 2024. DOI: 10.1353/sel.2013.0023 - Botting, Fred. Gothic. Routledge, 1996.
- Burdman, Javier. “Universality Without Consensus: Jean-François Lyotard on Politics in Postmodernity.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 46, no. 3, 2019, pp. 302–322. DOI: 10.1177/0191453719854215
- Burkholder, Robert E. “The song of the Earth, and: Green Writing: Romanticism and Ecology (review).” Comparative Literature Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, 2002, pp. 253–256. DOI: 10.1353/cls.2002.0018
- Caputo, John D. “The Good News about Alterity.” Faith and Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 4, 1993, pp. 453–470. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil199310440
- Da Rosa, M. Bueno. “François Lyotard: Considerations About Knowledge in the Post Modernity.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020, pp. 55–63. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3628430
- Fiske, John. Reading the popular. London: Routledge Classics, 2011.
- Garber, Fredrick. “Nature and the Romantic Mind: Egotism, Empathy, Irony.” Comparative Literature, vol. 29, no. 3, 1997, pp. 193–212. DOI: 10.2307/1769229
- Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. London: Routledge, 2012. DOI: 10.4324/9780203806838
- Garrard, Greg.
“The Romantic’s View of Nature.” Spirit of the Environment, edited by David Cooper and Joy Palmer, Routledge, 1998, pp. 113–130. - Gómez, Claudia. Rozas. “Strangers and Orphans: Knowledge and Mutuality in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 45, no. 4, 2012, pp. 360–370. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2012.718152
- Hammond, Kim. “Monsters of Modernity: Frankenstein and Modern Environmentalism.” Cultural Geographies, vol. 11, no. 2, 2004, pp. 181–198. DOI: 10.1191/14744744004eu301oa
- Hansen, Mascha. “Acorns and berries afford me sufficient nourishment: An Ecocritical Reading of the Monstrous in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Patrick Ness’s a Monster Calls.” Palgrave Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0353-3
- Hinchman, Lewis. P., & Hinchman, Sandra. K. “Should Environmentalists Reject the Enlightenment?.” The Review of Politics, vol. 63, no. 4, 2001, pp. 663–692.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408855 . DOI: 10.1017/S0034670500032125 - Hirsch, David.
“Liberty, Equality, Monstrosity: Revolutionizing the Family in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Monster Theory, edited by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen, University of Minnesota Press, 1996, pp. 115–143. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctttsq4d.9 - Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1093/oseo/instance.00025178
- Hutchings, Kevin. “Ecocriticism in British Romantic Studies.” Literature Compass, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 172–202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00417.x
- Jones, Jonathan. “Hidden voices: Language and Ideology in Philosophy of Language of the Long Eighteenth Century and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Textual Practice, vol. 19, no. 3, 2005, pp. 265–287. DOI: 10.1080/09502360500196243
- Kearney, Richard. Dialogue with Contemporary Continental Thinkers. Manchester University Press, 1984.
- Lew, Joseph W. “The Deceptive Other: Mary Shelley’s Critique of Orientalism in ‘Frankenstein.’” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 30, no. 2, 1991, pp. 255–83. JSTOR. DOI: 10.2307/25600894
- Lewens Tim. “Human Nature, Human Culture: the Case of Cultural Evolution.” Interface Focus. vol. 7, 2017, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0018
- Löwy, Michael, & Sayre, Robert. (2017). “Raymond Williams, Romanticism and Nature.” Capitalism Nature Socialism, vol. 29, no. 2, 2017, pp. 75–91. DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2017.1407070
- Lunsford, Lars. “The Devaluing of Life in Shelley’s Frankenstein.” The Explicator, vol. 68, no. 3, 2010, pp. 174–176. DOI: 10.1080/00144940.2010.499080
- Lyotard, Jean. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. (G. Bennington, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
- Lyotard, Jean -F., & Brügger, Niels. “What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard.” Yale French Studies, vol. 99, 2001, pp. 77–92. DOI: 10.2307/2903244
- Mellor, Anne K. “Frankenstein, Gender, and Mother Nature.” Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus: Annotated for Scientists, Engineers, and Creators of All Kinds, 2017, pp. 239–244. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10815.003.0011
- Mercer, Anna. “Beyond Frankenstein: The Collaborative Literary Relationship of Percy Bysshe and Mary Shelley.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 80–85. DOI: 10.1080/09524142.2016.1145937
- Mimiko, Emiope. “Defining Nature: Exploring the Human vs. Nature Opposition.” English 435: Topics in the Literature of the Long Nineteenth Century, 2017, pp. 1–8.
- Murphy, Patrick D. (1992). “Rethinking the Relations of Nature, Culture, and Agency.” Environmental Values, vol. 1, no. 4, 1992, pp. 311–320.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/30301328 . DOI: 10.3197/096327192776680025 - O’Rourke, James. “Nothing More Unnatural”: Mary Shelley’s Revision of Rousseau.” ELH, vol. 56, no. 3, 1989, pp. 543–569. DOI: 10.2307/2873197
- Olivier, Bert. “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Ecological Responsibility.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 34, no. 4, 2018, pp. 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2018.1538075
- Perkins, David. “Sympathy with Nature: Our Romantic Dilemma.” Harvard Review, no. 9, 1995, pp. 69–82. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27560488 . - Peters, Ted. “Playing God with Frankenstein.” Theology and Science, vol. 16, no. 2, 2018, pp. 145–150. DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2018.1455264
- Phillips, Bill. “Frankenstein and Mary Shelley’s ‘Wet Ungenial Summer.’” Atlantis, vol. 28, no. 2, 2006, pp. 59–68.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41055247 . - Poorghorban, Younes. “A Postmodern Criticism of the Enlightenment: Anthropocene Disorder and Nihilistic Anti-humanism in Charles Bukowski’s Pulp.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, vol. 14, no. 1, 1 Dec. 2022, pp. 96–109. DOI: 10.2478/ausp-2022-0008
- Poorghorban, Younes. “The Commodified Happiness: The Only Established Source of Meaning in Oscar Wilde’s The Happy Prince and The Nightingale and the Rose.” Prague Journal of English Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, 1 July 2022, pp. 51–65. DOI: 10.2478/pjes-2022-0003
- Porter, Roy. Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. London: Penguin Books, 2001. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-09800-9
- Rauch, Alan. “The Monstrous Body of Knowledge in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Studies in Romanticism, vol. 34, no. 2, 1995, pp. 227–253. DOI: 10.2307/25601114
- Rigby, Kate.
“Romanticism and Ecocriticism.” The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, edited by Greg Garrard, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 60–80. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199742929.013.003 - Ruttkay, Veronika. “Anatomy of Tragedy: The skeptical Gothic in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Palgrave Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0408-5
- Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. London: Bantam Dell, 2003.
- Smith, Andrew. Gothic Literature. Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
- Smith, Coralie. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein. (H. Bloom, Ed.). New York: Chelsea House, 2007.
- Suenaga, Keiichiro. “The ‘Industrial Enlightenment’ and Technological Paradigms of the Modern Steel Industry.” Technology in Society, vol. 63, 2020, pp. 1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101375
- Tongfang, Liu. “Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction.” Social Sciences in China, vol. 37, no. 3, 2016, pp. 41–55. DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2016.1162002
- Wolff, Jonathan. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
- Wolfson, Susan. J. “Introduction: Frankenstein, Race and Ethics.” The Keats-Shelley Review, vol. 34, no. 1, 2020, pp. 12–21. DOI: 10.1080/09524142.2020.1761110
- Wrigley, E. Anthony. “Reconsidering the Industrial Revolution: England and Wales.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 49, no. 1, 2018, pp. 9–42. DOI: 10.1162/jinh_a_01230