Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Patient Perspectives on Patronage of Traditional Bone Setting: A Systematic Review Cover

Patient Perspectives on Patronage of Traditional Bone Setting: A Systematic Review

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

PRISMA diagram.

Table 1

Study demographics.

AUTHOR, YEARLOCATION (REGION, COUNTRY)STUDY DESIGNPATIENTS (N)MEAN AGE (RANGE)MALE (%)PRINCIPAL REASON (%)
Abang et al. [10]NigeriaProspective observational7936.8 (17–83)59.5No choice
Aderibigbe et al. [17]NigeriaCross‑sectional40036.358Family and friend recommendation
Ali et al. [7]PakistanRetrospective observational8716.48 (6–81)64.4Availability
Aries et al. [18]GhanaQualitative29*–69–
Card et al. [19]TanzaniaCross‑sectional13**––Other
Chowdhury et al. [8]BangladeshProspective observational150(1–≥51)–Affordability
Dada et al. [9]NigeriaProspective observational12129.49 (6 weeks–72)57Affordability
Diamond et al. [11]NigeriaCross‑sectional19235.1 (10 months–76)64.6Belief
Edusei et al. [6]GhanaQualitative16(16–70)43.8–
Golge et al. [12]TurkeyCross‑sectional3422–58.1Belief/preference
Hamad et al. [20]SudanCross‑sectional389–53.2Belief
Hatipoglu and Tatar [1]TurkeyQualitative20(46–80)70Belief + availability
Idris et al. [2]SudanProspective observational27639.366Belief
Jibo et al. [13]NigeriaCross‑sectional22429 (1–82)79.9Affordability
Khan et al. [21]PakistanProspective observational6025.57 (5–65)73.3Belief
Kuubiere et al. [22]GhanaObservational80(7–70)63.7Belief
Moton et al. [23]PakistanCross‑sectional99932.59 (7–71)63.2Belief
Nwachukwu et al. [5]NigeriaQualitative17–––
Onyemaechi et al. [24]NigeriaCross‑sectional12037.4 (0–80)70Family and friend recommendation
Panda and Rout [3]IndiaProspective observational14648.655.5Other
Ruhinda [25]TanzaniaQualitative103–84–
Safari et al. [14]IranProspective observational6134.04 (11–75)72.1Affordability
Sayeed et al. [26]UgandaQualitative168––Belief
Solagberu [27]NigeriaProspective observational29528 (15–78)68.1Affordability
Udosen et al. [4]NigeriaCross‑sectional92(0–60)78Affordability
Yempabe et al. [28]GhanaCross‑sectional64–62.5Affordability
Zarrar et al. [29]PakistanRetrospective observational36238.6 (7–87)61Affordability
Zehir et al. [30]TurkeyCross‑sectional16227.560Other
Total––739433.4 (SD = 7.7)63.5% (SD = 8.6%)

[i] *N = 46 overall, only 29 had previously visited a TBS practitioner.

[ii] **N = 212 overall, only 13 had previously visited a TBS practitioner.

Table 2

Patient‑reported results by article.

AUTHOR, YEARPRIMARY REASON (%)SECONDARY REASONS (%)TERTIARY REASONS (%)
Abang et al. [10]No choiceBeliefTBS competency
Aderibigbe et al. [17]Family and friend recommendationAvailabilityFear of allopathic medicine
Ali et al. [7]AvailabilityFamily and friend recommendationAffordability
Card [19]No improvement at allopathic hospitalFamily and friend recommendation/no choice–
Chowdhury et al. [8]AffordabilityBeliefQuicker service
Dada et al. [9]AffordabilityFamily and friend recommendationBelief in faster healing
Diamond et al. [11]BeliefAffordabilityAvailability
Golge et al. [12]Belief/preferenceFear of disabilityFear of Plaster of Paris
Hamad et al. [20]BeliefAvailabilityFamily and friend recommendation
Hatipoglu and Tatar [1]Belief/availabilityAffordability/negative perspective of allopathic medicine–
Idris et al. [2]BeliefLess time consumingAffordability
Jibo et al. [13]AffordabilityAvoiding long hospital stayBelief/family and friend recommendation
Khan et al. [21]BeliefAffordabilityQuicker service
Kuubiere et al. [22]BeliefAffordabilityBelief in faster healing
Moton et al. [23]BeliefAffordabilityAvailability
Onyemaechi et al. [24]Family and friend recommendationAffordabilityBelief
Panda and Rout [3]Traditional skill and fameAffordabilityAvailability
Safari et al. [14]AffordabilityFamily and friend recommendationBelief
Sayeed et al. [26]BeliefWitchcraftFamily and friend recommendation
Solagberu [27]AffordabilityBelief in faster healingNegative perspective of allopathic medicine
Udosen et al. [4]AffordabilityBelief in faster healingFear of Plaster of Paris/complications
Yempabe et al. [28]AffordabilityBeliefQuicker service
Zarrar et al. [29]AffordabilityFear of surgeryFamily and friend recommendation
Zehir et al. [30]Avoiding long hospital treatmentFear of complicationsDiscomfort in cast
Table 3

Patient‑reported results by reason.

REASONSNUMBER OF ARTICLES AS THE PRIMARY REASONARTICLES
Belief in TBS*9[1, 2, 11, 20–23, 26]
Affordability8[4, 8, 9, 13, 14, 27, 29]
Availability*2[1, 7]
Family and friend recommendation2[17, 24]
No choice1[10]
No improvement at allopathic site1[19]
Preference1[12]
Skill1[3]
Long treatment at medical clinic1[30]

[i] *Hatipoglu and Tatar [1] had equal numbers of participants reporting availability and belief in TBS—as a result, they are counted in both categories.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.5295 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Page range: 86 - 86
Submitted on: Apr 26, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 22, 2026
Published on: Aug 31, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Sarah Elizabeth Flynn, Sumner Rajaratnam, Colin Kruse, Daniel K. Kisitu, Bradley A. Petrisor, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.