Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Economic Analysis of a Rest–Shade–Hydration–Sanitation Program at a Nicaraguan Sugar Mill Cover

Economic Analysis of a Rest–Shade–Hydration–Sanitation Program at a Nicaraguan Sugar Mill

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Variables employed in the cost‑benefit and return on investment calculations.

FIXED RSH‑S PROGRAM COSTS (ISA WIDE)
Electrolyte beverage production
Salaries for intervention staff
Worker employment and training costs
Worker equipment costs
VARIABLE RSH‑S PROGRAM OUTCOMES COSTS*COST SAVINGS DUE TO RSH‑S PROGRAM*
Cost of AKI treatmentReduced need for AKI treatment
Cost of absenteeism (i.e., worker turnover)Reduced absenteeism
Cost of productivity lossIncreased daily sugarcane cut

[i] *Data specific to burned cane cutters only.

Table 2

Average number of burned cane cutters and total number of workers at ISA, and total working days for burned cane cutters.

YEARTOTAL NUMBER OF BURNED CANE CUTTERSTOTAL LABOR FORCE AT ISATOTAL NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS PER BURNED CANE CUTTER
20174983775143
20182273503136
20191802755124
20201802527101
20211693028123
20221542932156

[i] The total number of burned cane cutters decreased throughout the observation period, while the total number of working days per burned cane cutter was relatively constant.

Table 3

Daily productivity for burned cane cutters from 2017 to 2022.

YEARAVERAGE SUGARCANE CUT PER WORKER PER DAY (IN TONS)
20175.7
20185.7
20195.6
20206.3
20215.9
20226.2

[i] Daily productivity increased throughout the observation period.

Table 4

Total workdays, missed workdays by reason, and total lost workdays for burned cane cutters.

YEARTOTAL WORKDAYSUNEXCUSED ABSENCECOMMON ILLNESSUNPAID TIME OFFOCCUPATIONAL RISKTOTAL LOST WORKDAYS
201771,21487231339215010,214
201830,87227321260871434282
201922,3208439301851042062
202018,1805855617937857
202120,78752415114542862
202224,024923314209251471

[i] Total lost workdays generally decreased throughout the observation period.

aogh-91-1-4753-g1.png
Figure 1

Calculated production losses and cost savings due to enhanced productivity from 2017 to 2022 in burned cane cutters. Production losses decreased and cost savings increased after initial implementation of the RSH‑S program in Harvest 2 (2018–2019) and enhanced implementation in Harvest 3 (2019–2020).

aogh-91-1-4753-g2.png
Figure 2

Total number of acute kidney injury (AKI) cases in burned cane cutters (n), as a function of the number of burned cane cutters (%) and the associated cost savings due to reduced AKI incidence in burned cane cutters. The number of AKI cases decreased, and cost savings increased after initial implementation of the RSH‑S program in Harvest 2 (2018–2019) and enhanced implementation in Harvest 3 (2019–2020).

Table 5

Annual fixed costs for implementation of the rest–shade–hydration–sanitation intervention.

YEAREQUIPMENTTRAININGOPERATIONSELECTROLYTE BEVERAGE PRODUCTIONTOTAL COSTS
2017$28,927.92$4,530.19$43,098.72$215,217.23$291,774.05
2018$29,616.68$2,957.69$44,124.88$219,748.12$296,447.36
2019$29,961.06$2,302.08$44,637.96$224,279.01$301,180.11
2020$30,305.44$2,525.23$45,151.04$226,544.45$304,526.16
2021$32,027.34$2,487.67$47,716.44$237,871.67$320,103.12
2022$34,438.00$2,617.23$51,308.00$255,995.23$344,358.46

[i] The annual fixed costs were largely unchanged throughout the observation period.

Table 6

Annual cost savings following implementation of the rest–shade–hydration–sanitation intervention in 2017.

YEARPRODUCTION SAVINGSAKI TREATMENT SAVINGSTOTAL SAVINGS
2017
2018$24,027.35$171.82$24,199.17
2019$185,868.50$5,865.47$191,733.97
2020$335,070.43$9,726.91$344,797.34
2021$526,825.50$4,717.02$531,542.52
2022$543,823.21$4,613.98$548,437.19

[i] Total savings, a function of production savings and AKI treatment savings, increased throughout the observation period.

aogh-91-1-4753-g3.png
Figure 3

The value of the benefits and investments following the implementation of the rest–shade–hydration–sanitation program in 2018 (bottom) and quantification of the annual net return on investment (top). The costs of implementing the RSH‑S program were offset by savings two years after initial implementation in Harvest 2 (2018–2019) and yielded a positive return on investment three years after implementation (Harvest 4, 2020–2021), which was sustained through 2022, the last year in which data were available.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4753 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 28, 2025
|
Accepted on: Oct 20, 2025
|
Published on: Nov 8, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Zachary J. Schlader, Thomas Boswell, Heath Prince, Catarina Wesseling, Fabiano A. Amorim, Dinesh Neupane, Esteban Arias, Scarlette Poveda, Erik Hansson, Rebekah A.I. Lucas, Kristina Jakobsson, David H. Wegman, Jason Glaser, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.