Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Economic Analysis of a Rest–Shade–Hydration–Sanitation Program at a Nicaraguan Sugar Mill Cover

Economic Analysis of a Rest–Shade–Hydration–Sanitation Program at a Nicaraguan Sugar Mill

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Abstract

Background: Occupational heat stress mediated acute kidney injury (AKI) has been linked to the development of chronic kidney disease of non‑traditional causes (CKDnt) in agriculture workers. Rest–shade–hydration–sanitation (RSH‑S) programs are promising interventions for preventing CKDnt. An obstacle to the implementation of RSH‑S programs is the concern that the reduced work time associated with these programs may reduce productivity and earnings.

Objective: This study analyzes the economic impact of an RSH‑S program implemented at a sugar mill in Nicaragua.

Approach: Data were obtained from the sugar mill over a six‑year, five‑harvest period (Harvest 1: 2017–2018 through Harvest 5: 2021–2022). Data included health and productivity metrics and RSH‑S program costs. During Harvest 1, existing heat mitigation strategies were in place but were not optimal. Thus, 2017 was considered the pre‑RSH‑S (baseline) period. Over subsequent harvests, progressively improved RSH‑S programs were implemented. A cost‑benefit analysis was conducted to estimate the return on investment of the RSH‑S program. The analysis considered both fixed and variable costs associated with the program. Benefits were calculated based on productivity improvements and reductions in AKI cases.

Findings: As soon as 2020, the costs of implementing the RSH‑S program were offset by savings resulting from increased productivity and reduced cases of AKI. The RSH‑S program yielded a positive return on investment from 2020 and onward. The average return on investment over the five‑year period was 0.02 (or a return of $1.02 for every $1.00 invested), which takes into consideration the first two years of the intervention in which there was a negative return on investment. In 2022, every $1.00 invested in the RSH‑S program saw a return of $1.60.

Conclusions: Implementing an RSH‑S program can provide both economic and health benefits, particularly in locations where climate change is increasing the already present risk and burden of occupational heat stress.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4753 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 28, 2025
|
Accepted on: Oct 20, 2025
|
Published on: Nov 8, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Zachary J. Schlader, Thomas Boswell, Heath Prince, Catarina Wesseling, Fabiano A. Amorim, Dinesh Neupane, Esteban Arias, Scarlette Poveda, Erik Hansson, Rebekah A.I. Lucas, Kristina Jakobsson, David H. Wegman, Jason Glaser, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.