Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Risk Reversal of Oral, Pharyngeal and Oesophageal Cancers after Cessation of Betel Quid Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cover

Risk Reversal of Oral, Pharyngeal and Oesophageal Cancers after Cessation of Betel Quid Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open Access
|Jan 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Summary risk estimates of studies evaluating the risk of oral, pharyngeal or oesophageal cancer in current and former BQ-T users.

SITE OF CANCERPRODUCT AND TYPE OF USERSSUMMARY RISK RATIO95% CIEGGER’S/BEGG’S TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS (P VALUE)
Oral cancerCurrent BQ-T user7.893.90–15.980.02
Former BQ-T user5.612.24–14.04
Pharyngeal cancerCurrent BQ-T user4.812.05–11.301.00
Former BQ-T user2.501.43–4.38
Oesophageal cancerCurrent BQ-T user2.421.25–4.690.81
Former BQ-T user2.641.87–3.72
agh-88-1-3643-g1.png
Figure 1

Forest plot and meta-RR (random effect) of the effect of BQ-T cessation on oral cancer risk (A – former users, B – current users).

agh-88-1-3643-g2.png
Figure 2

Forest plot and meta-RR (random effect) of the effect of BQ-T cessation on pharyngeal cancer risk (A – former users, B – current users).

agh-88-1-3643-g3.png
Figure 3

Forest plot and meta-RR (random effect) of the effect of BQ+T cessation on oral cancer risk (A – former users, B – current users).

Table 2

Summary risk estimates of studies evaluating the risk of oral cancer in current and former BQ+T users.

STUDIES INCLUDEDPRODUCT AND TYPE OF USERSSUMMARY RISK RATIO95% CI
OverallRef 13–19Current BQ+T user6.293.83–10.33
Former BQ+T user6.874.10–11.52
By GenderMalesRef 14–17, 19Current BQ+T user3.602.55–5.08
Former BQ+T user3.962.99–5.25
FemalesRef 14,15,19Current BQ+T user13.113.64–47.22
Former BQ+T user21.297.41–61-17
Studies with cofounder adjustmentRef 13,15,16,18,19Current BQ+T user6.293.83–10.33
Former BQ+T user9.025.32–15.29
Dropping cohort studies (problematic definition of “cessation”)15-18Current BQ+T user7.273.40-15.50
Former BQ+T user6.533.16–13.49
Case control studies with confounder adjustment and reasonable definition of “former” userRef 15,16Current BQ+T user9.612.77–33.30
Former BQ+T user7.632.57–22.63
Duration of cessationRef 15,16Former user <10 years1.210.90–1.63
Former user >10 years0.720.48–1.07
agh-88-1-3643-g4.png
Figure 4

Forest plot and meta-RR (random effect) of the effect of BQ+T cessation duration on Oral cancer. (A) Former users <10yrs and (B) Former users >10yrs.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3643 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Jan 11, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Ruchika Gupta, Lorena C. Mariano, Suzanne T. Nethan, Ashwini Kedar, Dhirendra N. Sinha, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Luis Monteiro, Shashi Sharma, Sanjay Gupta, Shalini Singh, Kurt Straif, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.