References
- de Rooij IJM, van de Port IGL, van der Heijden LLM, Meijer JWG, Visser-Meily JMA. Perceived barriers and facilitators for gait-related participation in people after stroke: From a patients’ perspective. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021; 37(12): 1337–45. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1698085
- Vachranukunkiet T, Esquenazi A. Pathophysiology of gait disturbance in neurologic disorders and clinical presentations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013; 24(2): 233–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.11.010
- Krawetz P, Nance P. Gait analysis of spinal cord injured subjects: effects of injury level and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77(7): 635–8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90000-3
- Moore S, Schurr K, Wales A, Moseley A, Herbert R. Observation and analysis of hemiplegic gait: swing phase. Aust J Physiother. 1993; 39(4): 271–8. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60487-6
- Moseley A, Wales A, Herbert R, Schurr K, Moore S. Observation and analysis of hemiplegic gait: stance phase. Aust J Physiother. 1993; 39(4): 259–67. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60486-4
- Park J, Kim TH. The effects of balance and gait function on quality of life of stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019; 44(1): 37–41. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182467
- An S, Lee Y, Shin H, Lee G. Gait velocity and walking distance to predict community walking after stroke. Nurs Health Sci. 2015; 17(4): 533–8. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12234
- Jenkin J, Parkinson S, Jacques A, Kho L, Hill K. Berg Balance Scales score as a predictor of independent walking at discharge among adult stroke survivors. Physiother Can. 2021; 73(3): 252–6. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0090
- Van Silfhout L, Hosman AJF, Bartels RHMA, Edwards MJR, Abel R, Curt A, et al. Ten meters walking speed in spinal cord–injured patients: does speed predict who walks and who rolls? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31(9): 842–50. doi: 10.1177/1545968317723751
- Dobkin BH. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(16): 1677–84. 10.1056/NEJMcp043511
- Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, Mountain A, Cameron JI, Jong A de, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke; 6th edition update 2019. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2020; 15(7): 763–88. doi: 10.1177/1747493019897843
- Ali A, Tabassum D, Baig SS, Moyle B, Redgrave J, Nichols S, et al. Effect of exercise interventions on health-related quality of life after stroke and transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2021; 52(7): 2445–55. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032979
- Abdullahi A, Truijen S, Umar NA, Useh U, Egwuonwu VA, Van Criekinge T, et al. Effects of lower limb constraint induced movement therapy in people with stroke: a systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 638904. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.638904
- Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 8(8): CD002840.2017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub4
- Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG, Scheets PL, Miller A, Haddad D, et al. Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020; 44(1): 49–100. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000303
- Chang WH, Kim MS, Huh JP, Lee PKW, Kim YH. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26(4): 318–24. doi: 10.1177/1545968311408916
- Capecci M, Pournajaf S, Galafate D, Sale P, Le Pera D, Goffredo M, et al. Clinical effects of robot-assisted gait training and treadmill training for Parkinson’s disease. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019; 62(5): 303–12. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.016
- Cao N, Packel A, Marcy E, Sprik K, Harold E, Xiao R, et al. Implementing robotic-assisted gait training in acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a quality improvement initiative. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 4(4): 168–73. doi: 10.4103/jisprm-000130
- Kwakkel G, Stinear C, Essers B, Munoz-Novoa M, Branscheidt M, Cabanas-Valdés R, et al. Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework. Eur Stroke J. 2023; 8(4): 880–94. doi: 10.1177/23969873231191304
- Choi S, Kim SW, Jeon HR, Lee JS, Kim DY, Lee JW. Feasibility of robot-assisted gait training with an end-effector type device for various neurologic disorders. Brain NeuroRehabilitation. 2020; 13(1): e6. doi: 10.12786/bn.2020.13.e6
- Bates BE, Xie D, Kwong PL, Kurichi JE, Cowper Ripley D, Davenport C, et al. Development and validation of prognostic indices for recovery of physical functioning following stroke: part 1. PM R. 2015; 7(7): 685–98. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.011
- Hsueh IP. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 73(2): 188–90. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.2.188
- Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987; 1: 6–18.
- Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965; 14: 61–5.
- Wales K, Lannin NA, Clemson L, Cameron ID. Measuring functional ability in hospitalized older adults: a validation study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40(16): 1972–8. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1323021
- Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42(8): 703–9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
- Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1993; 2(3): 169–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00435221
- Herdman M, Badia X, Berra S. El EuroQol-5D: una alternativa sencilla para la medición de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en atención primaria. Aten Primaria. 2001; 28(6): 425. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70406-4
- Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(7): 950–63. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00035-2
- Cheng DK, Nelson M, Brooks D, Salbach NM. Validation of stroke-specific protocols for the 10-meter walk test and 6-minute walk test conducted using 15-meter and 30-meter walkways. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020; 27(4): 251–61. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1691815
- Fulk GD, He Y. Minimal clinically important difference of the 6-Minute Walk Test in people with stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018; 42(4): 235–40. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000236
- Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the «get-up and go» test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67(6): 387–9.
- Foreman KB, Addison O, Kim HS, Dibble LE. Testing balance and fall risk in persons with Parkinson disease, an argument for ecologically valid testing. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011; 17(3): 166–71. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.12.007
- Baronchelli F, Zucchella C, Serrao M, Intiso D, Bartolo M. The Effect of robotic assisted gait Training with Lokomat® on balance control after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 661815. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.661815
- Calabrò RS, Sorrentino G, Cassio A, Mazzoli D, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E, et al. Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 57(3): 460–71. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06887-8
- Bruni MF, Melegari C, De Cola MC, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS. What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018; 48: 11–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.048
- Aprile I, Iacovelli C, Goffredo M, Cruciani A, Galli M, Simbolotti C, et al. Efficacy of end-effector robot-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: clinical and gait outcomes from a pilot bi-centre study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019; 45(2): 201–12. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192778
- Shin JC, Jeon HR, Kim D, Cho SI, Min WK, Lee JS, et al. Effects on the motor function, proprioception, balance, and gait ability of the end-effector robot-assisted gait training for spinal cord injury patients. Brain Sci. 2021; 11(10): 1281. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101281
- Hoekstra F, van Nunen MPM, Gerrits KHL, Stolwijk-Swüste JM, Crins MHP, Janssen TWJ. Effect of robotic gait training on cardiorespiratory system in incomplete spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(10): 1411–22. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.10.0186
- Pang MYC, Charlesworth SA, Lau RWK, Chung RCK. Using aerobic exercise to improve health outcomes and quality of life in stroke: evidence-based exercise prescription recommendations. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013; 35(1): 7–22. doi: 10.1159/000346075
- Penna LG, Pinheiro JP, Ramalho SHR, Ribeiro CF. Effects of aerobic physical exercise on neuroplasticity after stroke: systematic review. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021; 79(9): 832–43. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0551
- Mazzoleni S, Focacci A, Franceschini M, Waldner A, Spagnuolo C, Battini E, et al. Robot-assisted end-effector-based gait training in chronic stroke patients: A multicentric uncontrolled observational retrospective clinical study. NeuroRehabilitation Int Interdiscip J. 2017; 40(4): 483–92. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161435
- Geroin C, Picelli A, Munari D, Waldner A, Tomelleri C, Smania N. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison. Clin Rehabil. 2011; 25(6): 537–48. doi: 10.1177/0269215510389497
- Yu D, Yang Z, Lei L, Chaoming N, Ming W. Robot‐assisted gait training plan for patients in poststroke recovery period: a single blind randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 5820304. doi: 10.1155/2021/5820304
- De Araújo AVL, Neiva JFDO, Monteiro CBDM, Magalhães FH. Efficacy of virtual reality rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 7106951. doi: 10.1155/2019/7106951
- Domínguez Téllez P, Moral Muñoz JA, Casado Fernández E, Salazar Couso A, Lucena Antón D. Efectos de la realidad virtual sobre el equilibrio y la marcha en el ictus: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Rev Neurol. 2019; 69(06): 223. doi: 10.33588/rn.6906.2019063
- Ada L, Dean CM, Vargas J, Ennis S. Mechanically assisted walking with body weight support results in more independent walking than assisted overground walking in non-ambulatory patients early after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2010; 56(3): 153–61. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70020-5
- Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 10(10): CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub5
- Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices. J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44(3): 193–9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0943
- Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004; 36(2): 212–24. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
- Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(11): 1466–78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050266
- Pin-Barre C, Constans A, Brisswalter J, Pellegrino C, Laurin J. Effects of high- versus moderate-intensity training on neuroplasticity and functional recovery after focal ischemia. Stroke. 2017; 48(10): 2855–64. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017962
- Lee J, Kim DY, Lee SH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Lim KB, et al. End-effector lower limb robot-assisted gait training effects in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(42): e35568. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035568
- Shin JC, Jeon HR, Kim D, Min WK, Lee JS, Cho SI, et al. Effects of end-effector robot-assisted gait training on gait ability, muscle strength, and balance in patients with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2023; 53(3): 335–46. doi: 10.3233/NRE-230085