Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Response of menstrual irregularity and infertility-related stress to ultrasound cavitation combined with aerobic exercise in polycystic ovarian syndrome: double blinded randomized controlled trial Cover

Response of menstrual irregularity and infertility-related stress to ultrasound cavitation combined with aerobic exercise in polycystic ovarian syndrome: double blinded randomized controlled trial

Open Access
|Feb 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Flow chart for participant recruitment and allocation

McNemar test crosstabs of menstruation regularity in patients with PCOS

Group A
Before treatmentAfter treatment
Regular Irregular
Regular3 0
Irregular3 24
Total number (group A)n = 30
Significance of changep = 0.250
Group B
After treatment
Regular Irregular
Regular4 0
Irregular5 21
Total number (group B)n = 30
Significance of changep = 0.063

Two-way mixed design MANOVA of outcome measures

Outcome measuresGroupPre-treatmentPost treatment Group A vs. Group B
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMD (95% CI)p valuePre-p valuePost p valueMD (95% CI)
BMIGroup A32.86 ± 1.530.34 ± 1.472.52 (2.23, 2.80)p = 0.000*p = 0.095p = 0.000*2.17 (1.40, 2.96)
Group B33.48 ± 1.2928.17 ± 1.535.31 (5.03, 5.60)p = 0.000*
WHRGroup A0.92 ± 0.020.86 ± 0.030.06 (0.042,0.063)p = 0.000*p = 0.212p = 0.000*0.06 (0.05, 0.08)
Group B0.91 ± 0.020.80 ± 0.030.11 (0.10, 0.12)p = 0.000*
LHGroup A12.95 ± 3.2810.72 ± 2.442.23 (1.48, 2.97)p = 0.000*p = 0.414p = 0.000*2.8 (1.75, 3.84)
Group B12.27 ± 3.077.92 ± 1.494.35 (3.61, 5.08)p = 0.000*
FSHGroup A5.65 ± 1.375.49 ± 0.680.16 (-0.19, 0.52)p = 0.362p = 0.398p = 0.0960.32 (-0.06, 0.70)
Group B5.35 ± 1.365.17 ± 0.770.18 (-0.18, 0.54)p = 0.316
LH/FSH ratioGroup A2.35 ± 0.331.93 ± 0.380.42 (0.16, 0.70)p = 0.002*p = 0.962p = 0.000*0.39 (0.23, 0.54)
Group B2.35 ± 1.021.54 ± 1.880.81 (0.54, 1.07)p = 0.000*
Interpersonal domainGroup A34.67 ± 3.4627.77 ± 2.976.90 (5.87, 7.93)p = 0.000*p = 0.511p = 0.000*4.57 (2.87, 6.27)
Group B35.31 ± 4.0023.20 ± 3.9912.11 (11.07, 13.14)p = 0.000*
Intrapersonal domainGroup A33.20 ± 3.2727.36 ± 3.215.84 (4.51, 7.16)p = 0.000*p = 0.822p = 0.000*4.69 (3.06, 6.33)
Group B33.00 ± 3.5922.67 ± 3.1110.33 (9.00, 11.66)p = 0.000*
Cortisol levelGroup A13.08 ± 2.699.38 ± 2.123.70 (3.08, 4.31)p = 0.000*p = 0.501p = 0.000*2.76 (1.82, 3.71)
Group B13.54 ± 2.576.62 ± 1.496.92 (6.30, 7.53)p = 0.000*

One-way between subject MANOVA for the demographic data of the two tested groups

X̅ ± SDp value of significance Group A vs. Group B
Demographic datagroup (A)group (B)
Age (years)27.23 ± 3.7326.90 ± 4.05p = 0.742
Weight (kg)88.30 ± 6.2090.17 ± 6.78p = 0.270
Height (cm)164.00 ± 5.00163.90± 4.70p = 0.937
Body mass index (kg/m2)32.86 ± 1.5433.48 ± 1.44p = 0.095
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 72
Submitted on: Nov 11, 2024
|
Accepted on: Feb 14, 2025
|
Published on: Feb 20, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Shreen Aboelmagd, Marwa Shafiek Saleh, Mai M. A. Shehata, Ali Abdelmoezz Dahi, Nehad Ahmed Abo-zaid, Elham Shahat Hassan, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.