Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of Pilates exercises on muscle strength and balance after healed lower limb burns Cover

Effect of Pilates exercises on muscle strength and balance after healed lower limb burns

Open Access
|Nov 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

CONSORT flow chart of the study

Fig. 2.

Estimated marginal means in both groups for (a) knee flexor strength (b) knee extensor strength (c)BBS score (d)LEFS score

Progression of the Pilates exercises

Time pointExercisesSetsRepetitions
Week 1Hundred, spine stretch forward, and roll up and down.310
Week 2(Week 1 exercises) + single leg stretch and double leg stretch.310
Week 3(Week 2 exercises) + clams and single leg kicks.310
Week 4(Week 3 exercises) + side leg kicks.310
Week 5(Week 4 exercises) + shoulder bridge and criss cross.310
Week 6(Week 5 exercises) + one leg circle and hip twist.310
Week 7(Week 6 exercises) + swimming, standing footwork, and squatting.310
Week 8Week 7 exercises.310

Comparing the characteristics of participants between both groups

Group AGroup BMDt- valuep-value
Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Age (years)29.34 ± 5.4628.61 ± 5.150.730.610.54
BMI (kg/m2)26.85 ± 1.1826.49 ± 1.040.361.410.16
TBSA (%)35.24 ± 2.7434.68 ± 2.680.560.890.37
TBSA LL (%)22.11 ± 1.5721.66 ± 1.760.451.170.25
Anterior thigh (%)6.79 ± 0.747.05± 0.4−0.26−1.930.06
Posterior thigh (%)6.11± 0.925.89± 0.950.210.980.33
Anterior leg (%)5.45± 0.895.5± 0.51−0.05−0.320.75
Posterior leg (%)4.42± 0.54.26± 0.640.161.190.24
Foot (%)2.39± 0.722.37± 0.940.030.140.89
TBSALL, n (%)
Dominant22 (58.89%)25 (65.79%) χ2 = 0.50.48
Non dominant16 (42.1%)13 (34.21%)
Sex, n (%)
Female22 (58.89%)19 (50%) χ2 = 0.470.49
Male16 (42.1%)19 (50%)

Mean knee flexor and extensor strength before and after treatment, both groups

Group AGroup B
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMD (95% CI)p- valueEffect size
Knee flexors (kg)
Pre-treatment18.61 ± 1.2118.88 ± 1.12−0.27 (−0.81,0.26)0.31
Post-treatment27.01 ± 1.3823.06 ± 1.673.95 (3.25,4.65)0.0012.58
MD (95% CI)−8.40 (−9.1, −7.75)−4.18 (−4.83, −3.53)
% of change (effect size)45.14 (4.58)22.14 (2.08)
p = 0.001p = 0.001
Knee extensors (kg)
Pre-treatment19.91 ± 1.2920.29 ± 1.58−0.38 (−1.03,0.29)0.26
Post-treatment30.11 ± 1.7126.46 ± 1.663.65(2.88,4.42)0.0012.17
MD (95% CI)−10.20 (−10.89, −9.51)−6.17 (−6.87, −5.49)
% of change (effect size)51.23 (4.76)30.41 (2.7)
p = 0.001p = 0.001

Mean BBS and LEFS before and after treatment, both groups

Group AGroup B
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMD (95% CI)p- valueEffect size
BBS
Pre-treatment28.37 ± 2.1228.92 ± 2.27−0.55 (−1.56,0.45)0.27
Post-treatment49.66 ± 2.0841.74 ± 2.397.92(6.9,8.95)0.013.54
MD (95% CI)−21.29 (−22.34, −20.24)−12.82 (−13.86, −11.77)
% of change (effect size)75.04 (7.17)44.33 (3.89)
p = 0.001p = 0.001
LEFS
Pre-treatment52.42 ± 4.5452.68 ± 4.58−0.26 (−2.35,1.82)0.80
Post-treatment76.37 ± 1.6364.13 ± 2.0212.24 (11.4,13.08)0.0016.67
MD (95% CI)−23.95 (−25.56, −22.33)−11.45 (−13.06, −9.83)
% of change (effect size)45.69 (4.97)21.74 (2.29)
p = 0.001p = 0.001
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 44
Submitted on: Aug 8, 2024
|
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2024
|
Published on: Nov 7, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Yasmeen Hamada Lotfy Mohamed, Khadra Mohamed Ali, Ashraf Elsebaie Mohamed, Nancy Hassan Aboelnour, Haidy Nady Ashem, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.