Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Postural control in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Literature review Cover

Postural control in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. Literature review

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of search strategy and selection of studies for inclusion in the review

Description of the studies included in the review

AuthorMeasurement of postural stabilityStudy participantsMain conclusions
Geurts et al. [10]Velocity of COP: (1) standing barefoot with EO. EC and in smudged glasses for 20 sec; (2) modified Stroop test 3 × 30 sec in sitting positionHMSN IHMSN IIHSCompared to the control group, patients with HMSN show decreased effectiveness of postural control as well as increased visual control of posture in standing position
8614
Nardone et al. [7]Sway area: (1) standing with feet together, EO and EC for 51 sec; (2) standing with feet 10 cm apart, EO and EC for 51 secCMT1AHSMost CMT1A patients are able to maintain a normal standing position because their Aß fibres are only slightly altered anatomically or functionally
1546
Nardone et al. [8]Sway area: standing with feet 10 cm apart, EO and EC for 51 secCMT1ACMT2DNHSCMT2 and DN patients are unstable when standing. CMT1A patients show only a slight deterioration of postural control (statistically insignificant) compared to healthy subjects due to the fact that their Aß fibres are relatively spared.
58120
van der Linden et al. [1]Velocity of COP: (1) standing with EO; (2) standing with EC; (3) standing with EO on uneven surface; (4) standing with EC on uneven surface. Each task lasted 30 secCMT1ASMA (distal)HSCompared to healthy subjects, postural stability is seriously weakened in both groups. Postural instability of CMT1A patients correlates significantly with a weakened vibration sensation.
9811
Nardone et al. [11]Sway area: standing with EO and EC. Each test lasted 51 secCMT1ADNHSPatients with CMT1A show a normal body sway area in standing position, while in patients with diabetic neuropathy the sway area is larger compared to both healthy subjects and CMT1A patients.Compared to healthy subjects, patients with CMT1A show weakened postural stability. Instability seems to be related to the weakening of the dorsal flexors of the foot in people with a mild course of CMT1A.
101238
Tozza et al. [12]Velocity of COP and sway area: standing with EO and EC, feet 10 cm apart. Each test lasted 51 secCMT1AHS
2124
Costa et al. [13]Velocity of COP: three measurements with EO and EC, each measurement lasted 15 sec.CMT2GHSIn a mild course of the disease, postural instability of patients with CMT2G results from weakening of the dorsal and plantar flexors of the foot. In the more advanced form of the disease, weakened lower leg muscles and impaired proprioception are the cause of poorer postural control.
1515
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 47
Submitted on: Oct 31, 2020
|
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 8, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Katarzyna Bienias, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.