Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effectiveness of physiotherapy in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) Cover

Effectiveness of physiotherapy in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)

Open Access
|May 2019

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Cyriax manual therapy techniques used in CTS therapy [37].

Fig. 2.

Neuromobilization used in the treatment of CTS [5].

Fig. 3.

Application according to the kinesiotaping method used in the treatment of CTS [39].

Fig. 4.

Examination’s position testing changes in the dimensions of the wrist canal during the use of manual therapy techniques [3].

Analysis of applied physiotherapeutic procedures in articles

AuthorsType of physiothe-rapy interventionFrequency and duration of the interventionIntervention effectiveness toolsEffectivenessEffectiveness some time after the end of therapyConclusion
1. Pratelli et al. 2015Fascial manipulation (FM) Low-level laser therapy (LLLT)FM: 45 min / 1 time a week / Three weeks LLLT: 780-830 nm 1000-3000 mW 10 min / 5 daysVAS scale BCTQ scale (SSS, FSS)After 10 days BCTQ, VAS: FM (T0-T1) (p <0.001) improvement LLLT (T0-T1) (P <0.001) improvementAfter 3 months BCTQ, VAS: FM (T0-T2) (p <0.001) improvement LLLT (T0-T2) (P <0.001) No changesFM is an effective method of treating not only musculoskeletal dysfunctions, but also nervous disorders, including CTS.
2. Bueno-Gracia et al.2018Manual mobilization of the wrist bonesOne-time mobilization under ultrasound guidanceUltrasound of the wrist CSA - cross-sectional area of the wrist ADP-anterolateral diameter TD-larger and smaller nerve axis, Circulation of the wrist canal Coefficient of flattening of the carpal tunnel and median canalCSA (p=0,003) APD (p=0,001)-Manual mobilization of the wrist bones causes significant changes in the dimensions of the wrist canal, enabling CTS treatment.
3. Wolny et al. 2018Neuromobilization (NT) Placebo techniques (ST)20 min/2 times a week / 10 weeksBCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) Numeric pain scale (0-10pkt) Study of two-point sensory discrimination (2PD) ENG Dynamometric examination of the handNT: NCS (P <0.001) improvement 2PD, BCTQ (FSS, SSS) (p <0.01) improvement reduction of pain (p <0.01) improvement NT and ST: strength of grip and hand clamp (P> 0.05) no changes-The use of neuromobilization has an effective therapeutic effect in the treatment of mild and moderate forms of CTS.
4. Wolny et al. 2017Manual therapy with neuromobilization and functional massage trapezius muscle) Low level laser therapy and ultrasounds (EM)MT and EM: 2 times a week/10 weeks20 MT sessions 20 treatments Laser:* 5J, 50mW, 658nm, 1 min, 40 sec* 24J, 400mW, 808nm, 1 minUltrasounds: 1MHz. 1.0 w / cm, 75%, 15 minVAS scale BCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) ENGENG MT and partly EM improvement (p <0.01) VAS MT and EM improvement (P <0.01) BCTQ (SSS, FSS) MT and EM improvement (P <0.01)Statistically significant difference between ENG, BCTQ and VAS between MT and EM groups.-Both low level laser therapy and ultrasound therapy as well as manual therapy combined with other techniques is effective in the treatment of CTS.The techniques used in the MT group showed a slightly higher therapeutic efficacy of CTS.The combination of MT and EM methods may brings increased efficacy in the treatment of CTS.
5. Maddali Bongi et al. 2013Interventions in the field of manual therapy (MT)10-15 min / 6 sessions / 2 times a week/Three weeksBCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) ENG VAS scale Patient’s discomfort associated with CTS (paraesthesia, night pain, pain, hypersensitivity, hand sensitivity)BCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) (p <0.05) improvement ENG (P <0.05) no changes Patient’s discomfort: (p <0.05) improvementAfter 24 weeks BCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) improvement (p <0.05) ENG no changes (P <0.05) Patient’s discomfort: improvement (P <0.05)Manual therapy is an effective inoperable way of treating symptoms in patients with CTS
6. Dinar-vand et al. 2017Research group: Manual therapy of scaphoid and hamate bones in the treatment of CTS with immobilization Control group: CTS treatment with immobilization10 min/3 times a week/8 weeksBCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) ENG VASBCTQ scale (SSS, FSS) (p <0.05) improvement VAS (p <0.05) improvement ENG (P> 0.05) no changes-The mobilization of scaphoid and hamate bones is an effective treatment of middle and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome
7. Oskouei et al.2014Research group (RG): median nerve neuromobilization + routine therapy Control group (CG): Routine therapy (immobilization 0 degrees, TENS ultra-sounds)RG: 3 times a week / 4 weeks CG: Immobilization - 4 weeks at night, TENS-80 Hz, 60μs, 3 x per week, 20 minutes Ultrasounds - 5 min, 1MHz, 1W / cm2, 20%, 3 x per weekClinical (Phalen) ENG BCTQ (SSS, FSS) VAS scale MNTT (median nerve tension test)RG and CG BCTQ (SSS) (P <0.05) improvement MNTT, Phalen test, VAS (P <0.05) improvementOnly RG: BCTQ (FSS) (P <0.05) improvement ENG-DML-(P <0.05) improvement-Neuromuscular neuromobilization as well as standard therapeutic procedures (immobilization, TENS, UD) are effective in the treatment of CTS.The techniques used in GB showed a slightly higher therapeutic efficacy of CTS.The combination of RG and CG methods may bring increased efficacy in the treatment of CTS.
8. Yıldırım et al.2017Research group (RG) exercise, kinesiotaping Control group (CG) exercisesexercises 3 times a day for 15 repetitions / for 6 weekskinesiotaping: 3 applications every 5 daysBCTQ (SSS, FSS ultrasound Dynamometric measurement of hand and finger strength Moberg testNo significant differences between RG and CG in USG, BCTQ, Moberg test, fist and finger pressure at 6 weeks. (p> 0.005)The difference statistically significant between RG and CG in BCTQ (FSS), Moberg test, ultrasound in week 3 (P <0.05)-Exercises in combination with kinesiotaping can be an effective method of CTS therapy, which should be confirmed with subsequent tests.

Summary of articles research material

AuthorsThe aim of the studySubject of the research groupSubject of the control groupGender of participantsAge of participants
1. Pratelli et al. 2015Comparison between fascial manipulation (FM) and low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of CTS.
  • FM-35 hands

  • LLLT-35 hands

-
  • 29 females

  • 13 males

54,2 (38-74 years of age)
2. Bueno-Gracia et al. 2018Evaluation of changes in the size of the carpal tunnel and median nerve after mobilization of the carpal bones.
  • 33 hands (18 participants)

  • 3 ultrasound imaging during wrist mobilization without CTS

  • 33 hands (18 participants)

  • 3 ultrasound imaging without mobilization of the wrist bones without CTS

  • 9 females

  • 9 males

26 (20-37 years of age)
3. Wolny et al. 2018Comparison of the effectiveness of neuromobilization and placebo therapy „Sham therapy” in the treatment of CTS
  • 78 participants

  • 72 participants

  • 135 females

  • 15 males

NT-54.2 (28-69 years of age)ST-52.2 (27-70 years of age
4. Wolny et al. 2017Comparison of the effectiveness of manual therapy, neuromobilization and other manual techniques (functional massage of trapezius muscle) with low level laser therapy and ultrasounds in the treatment of CTS
  • 70 participants with CTS MT

  • 70 participants with CTS EM

-
  • MT: 62 famale, 8 male

  • EM: 60 famale, 10 male

MT: 53.1 (26-72 years of age)EM: 51.5 (28-71 years of age)
5. Maddali Bongi et al. 2013Evaluation of the effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of CTS symptoms.
  • 22 participants CTS (41 hands)

-
  • 20 females

  • 2 male

65,5± 8, 12 years of age
6. Dinarvand iet al. 2017Evaluation of the effectiveness of scaphoid and hamate bones mobilization in the treatment of moderate CTS.
  • 18 hands

  • 19 hands

  • 37 females

(35-60 years of age) Research group: 46.36 Control group: 49.22
7. Oskouei et al. 2014Comparison of the effectiveness of neuromobilization with routine physiotherapeutic treatment (immobilization, TENS currents and ultrasounds) in CTS therapy.
  • 16 hands

  • 16 hands

  • 20 participants; no specified gender

46.7± 11 (18-65 years of age)
8. Yıldırım et al. 2018The influence of kinesiotaping on the treatment of light and moderate CTS
  • 19 hands

  • 19 hands

  • 20 females

  • 1 males

(18-60 years of age) Research group: 48.81 ± 6.40 Control group: 48.70 ± 7.61
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 58
Submitted on: Feb 22, 2019
|
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2019
|
Published on: May 29, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Patrycja Żaneta Bobowik, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.