Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The evaluation of the effectiveness of the Functional Movement System concept in improving physical performance and reducing the pain of the Flying Personnel of the Polish Armed Forces Cover

The evaluation of the effectiveness of the Functional Movement System concept in improving physical performance and reducing the pain of the Flying Personnel of the Polish Armed Forces

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Percentage distribution of the occurrence of discomfort and pain symptoms in both groups depending on the type of work

Type of workStudy groupControl group
Test 1Test 2Test 1Test 2
Helicopter pilots41.7 %0 %12.9 %6.5 %
Transport aircraft pilots28.6 %0 %0 %14.29 %
High maneuverability aircraft pilots33.3 %0 %0 %0 %
Flying Engineers7.7 %0 %5.9 %5.9 %
Parachute instructors38.5 %7.7 %0 %33.3 %

The age profile of individual groups

Number of respondentsAverage ageMinimumMaximumStandard deviationConfidence interval
Helicopter pilotsStudy group2433.725.052.07.1P{30.6<m<36.8}=0.95
Control group3132.826.052.07.4P{30.0<m<35.6}=0.95
Transport aircraft pilotsStudy group730.025.035.05.0P{25.0<m<35.0}=0.95
Control group739.031.047.011.3P{27.7<m<50.3}=0.95
High maneuverability aircraft pilotsStudy group334.327.042.05.4P{17.9<m<50.7}=0.95
Control group236.028.047.06.4P{16.5<m<63.5}=0.95
Flying EngineersStudy group1340.329.047.05.4P{36.9<m<43.7}=0.95
Control group1738.628.046.06.1P{35.2<m<42.0}=0.95
Parachute instructorsStudy group1337.231.050.05.6P{33.7<m<40.7}=0.95
Control group3.037.735.043.04.6P{23.7<m<51.7}=0.95

Analysis of the relationship between the occurrence of discomfort and pain symptoms and selected variables for both groups

Variablep
Study groupTest 1Performed work vs. occurrence of pain0.043
Age vs. occurrence of pain0.261
Test 2Performed work vs. occurrence of pain0.265
Age vs. occurrence of pain0.907
Control groupTest 1Performed work vs. occurrence of pain0.358
Age vs. occurrence of pain0.024
Test 2Performed work vs. occurrence of pain0.472
Age vs. occurrence of pain0.496

An average FMS test score for both groups related to the type of work

Type of workStudy group Control group
Test 1Test 2pTest 1Test 2p
Helicopter pilots14.916.70.00314.815.20.516
Transport aircraft pilots13.715.20.19914.114.00.885
High maneuverability aircraft pilots14.315.70.23015.017.00.293
Flying Engineers13.014.60.04514.814.90.854
Parachute instructors14.416.50.01814.714.30.900

The age profile of the analyzed groups

Number of respondentsAverage ageMinimumMaximumStandard deviationConfidence interval
Total12035.525.052.06.9P{34.3<m<36.7}=0.95
Study group6035.825.052.06.6P{34.1<m<37.5}=0.95
Control group6035.326.052.07.2P{33.5<m<37.1}=0.95

Analysis of differences in the FMS test results before and after a series of exercises

AverageMin.Max.SDConfidence intervalp
Study groupTest 114.29.019.02.2P{13.6<m<14.8}=0.950.0001
Test 216.011.019.02.0P{15.5<m<16.5}=0.95
Control groupTest 114.811.018.01.8P{14.3<m<15.3}=0.950.19
Test 215.011.018.02.0P{14.5<m<15.5}=0.95
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 42
Published on: Apr 11, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Aleksandra Stanek, Arkadiusz Berwecki, Aneta Bac, Tomasz Ridan, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.