Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparing the Effectiveness of ChatGPT3.5 and Bing GPT4 as Supplementary Resources to Enhance the Teaching, Learning, and Assessment of Human Anatomy Cover

Comparing the Effectiveness of ChatGPT3.5 and Bing GPT4 as Supplementary Resources to Enhance the Teaching, Learning, and Assessment of Human Anatomy

Open Access
|Jan 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in revolutionizing healthcare education by providing efficient and beneficial learning opportunities for students and reducing the workload for educators.  
Materials and methods: This study was conducted from September 2023 to October 2023 assessing the accuracy, relevance, comprehensiveness, and user-friendliness of responses given by ChatGPT3.5 and Bing GPT4 on human anatomy.
Results: Both AI tools were able to provide detailed descriptions of gross anatomy, human embryology, and histology. While both showed a need for improvement in generating sample questions, Traditional methods still offer superior accuracy and relevance compared to AI Chatbots. But Chatbots provide personalized and convenient responses.
Conclusion: As AI technology continues to evolve, caution should be exercised in using AI tools for anatomy education, as their capabilities and performance may change over time.

Language: English
Page range: 62 - 69
Published on: Jan 30, 2025
Published by: South East Asia Regional Association for Medical Education (SEARAME)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 A. M. Wickramarathna, S. S. Kumara, R. U. Buddhasinghe, A. E. Wijayasekara, published by South East Asia Regional Association for Medical Education (SEARAME)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.