Abstract
This article discusses the necessity for the establishment of an international environmental crime. There is a growing feeling of impunity regarding serious environmental damage resulting from corporate activity. As a response, numerous scholars and lawyers advocate for the recognition of an international crime against environment. By analysing the environmental and health consequences of Chevron’s oil activity in Ecuador and the subsequent legal battle, this article highlights the imbalances that exist between multinational corporations (MNCs), states, and individuals regarding access to justice and remedies, and shows how the international legal framework could be described as ‘corporate-friendly’ when it comes to serious environmental damages. It then offers an overview of the opportunities and arguments in favour of a separate international crime.