Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of the lower visual field obstruction on adaptive gait during obstacle crossing in healthy young adults Cover

Effects of the lower visual field obstruction on adaptive gait during obstacle crossing in healthy young adults

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Heijnen, M.J., Rietdyk, S., Falls in young adults: Perceived causes and environmental factors assessed with a daily online survey, Hum. Mov. Sci., 2016, 46: 86–95. 10.1016/j.humov.2015.12.007.
  2. Li, K.W., Chen, Y., Li, N., Duan, T., Zou, F., Assessment of risk of tripping before and after crossing obstacles under dimmed lighting conditions, Work, 2020, 66: 551–559. 10.3233/wor-203197.
  3. Timsina, L.R., Willetts, J.L., Brennan, M.J., Marucci-Wellman, H., Lombardi, D.A., Courtney, T.K., Verma, S.K., Circumstances of fall-related injuries by age and gender among community-dwelling adults in the United States, PLoS One, 2017, 12: e0176561. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176561.
  4. Sakurai, R., Kodama, K., Ozawa, Y., Adaptive locomotion during subtle environmental changes in younger and older adults, Sci. Rep., 2022, 12: 12438. 10.1038/s41598-022-16436-4.
  5. Geissmann, M., Holliger, N.S., Neumann, L.C., Eilfort, A.M., Filli, L., Simulating real-world slips: Enhanced kinematic and neuromuscular responses to experimental slips in the early vs Late stance phase in young and older adults, Bioengineering, 2025, 12: 1284. 10.3390/bioengineering12121284.
  6. Lim, S., Luo, Y., Lee-Confer, J., D’Souza, C., Obstacle clearance performance in individuals with high body mass index, Appl. Ergon., 2023, 106: 103879. 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103879.
  7. Ullah, S., Iqbal, K., Rizwan, M., Gait and postural control deficits in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy compared to healthy controls, Bioengineering, 2025, 12: 1034. 10.3390/bioengineering12101034.
  8. Wang, I.L., Gu, C.Y., Lei, T.H., Su, Y., Yao, S., Mündel, T., Mo, S., Effect of hyperthermia on simulated muscle activation in female when crossing obstacle, Sci. Rep., 2024, 14: 10635. 10.1038/s41598-024-61536-y.
  9. Verma, S.K., Willetts, J.L., Corns, H.L., Marucci-Wellman, H.R., Lombardi, D.A., Courtney, T.K., Falls and fall-related injuries among community-dwelling adults in the united states, PLoS One, 2016, 11: e0150939. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150939.
  10. Vaibhavi, R.S., Megha, S., Comparison of effect of concurrent phone texting on gait speed in young and middle aged healthy subjects, Int. J. Community Med. Public Health, 2019, 6: 5142–5145. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20195459.
  11. Rietdyk, S., Rhea, C.K., The effect of the visual characteristics of obstacles on risk of tripping and gait parameters during locomotion, Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt., 2011, 31: 302–310. 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00837.x.
  12. Brittney, C.M., Bodratti, L.A., Cody, E.M., Jeffrey, M.H., Richard, E.A.v.E., Shirley, R., Gait characteristics during inadvertent obstacle contacts in young, middle-aged and older adults, Gait Posture, 2020, 77: 100–104. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.01.020.
  13. Chu, N.C.W., Sturnieks, D.L., Lord, S.R., Menant, J.C., Visuospatial working memory and obstacle crossing in young and older people, Exp. Brain. Res., 2022, 240: 2871–2883. 10.1007/s00221-022-06458-9.
  14. Malik, R.N., Marigold, D.S., Chow, M., Lam, T., Probing the deployment of peripheral visual attention during obstacle-crossing planning, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2022, 16: 1039201. 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1039201.
  15. Rodrigo, S.M., Shawn, M.O.C., Donelan, J.M., Daniel, S.M., Foot placement relies on state estimation during visually guided walking, J. Neurophysiol., 2017, 117: 480–491. 10.1152/jn.00015.2016.
  16. Shirley, R., Christopher, K.R., The effect of the visual characteristics of obstacles on risk of tripping and gait parameters during locomotion, Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt., 2011, 31: 302–310. 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00837.x.
  17. Rhiel, S., Kläy, A., Keller, U., van Hedel, H.J.A., Ammann-Reiffer, C., Comparing walking-related everyday life tasks of children with gait disorders in a virtual reality setup with a physical setup: cross-sectional noninferiority study. JSG, 2024, 12: e49550. 10.2196/49550.
  18. Binaee, K., Diaz, G.J., Assessment of an augmented reality apparatus for the study of visually guided walking and obstacle crossing, Behav. Res. Methods, 2019, 51: 523–531. 10.3758/s13428-018-1105-9.
  19. Rania, A., Emily, A.K., Wright, W.D., Erin, V., Carole, A.T., Effects of head-mounted display on kinematics of the timed up and Go (TUG) test: Does the addition of a visual stimulus matter? Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2018, 12: 0–0. 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2018.227.00019.
  20. Timmis, M.A., Pardhan, S., Patients with central visual field loss adopt a cautious gait strategy during tasks that present a high risk of falling, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 2012, 53: 4120–4129. 10.1167/iovs.12-9897.
  21. Hagio, S., Kouzaki, M., Visuomotor transformation for the lead leg affects trail leg trajectories during visually guided crossing over a virtual obstacle in humans, Front. Neurosci., 2020, 14: 357. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00357.
  22. Yan, C., Aiying, W., Min, M., Wei, S., Qipeng, S., Dewei, M., Tai Chi practice enables prefrontal cortex bilateral activation and gait performance prioritization during dual-task negotiating obstacle in older adults, Front. Aging. Neurosci., 2022, 14: 1000427. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1000427.
  23. Wu, K.W., Yu, C.H., Huang, T.H., Lu, S.H., Tsai, Y.L., Wang, T.M., Lu, T.W., Children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy display specific kinematic strategies during obstacle-crossing, Sci. Rep., 2023, 13: 17094. 10.1038/s41598-023-44270-9.
  24. Srikant, V., Chi Wei, T., Mukul, M., Austin, J.D., Nicholas, S., Biomechanical analyses of stair-climbing while dual-tasking, J. Biomech., 2015, 48: 921–929. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.024.
  25. Kim, S., Lockhart, T.E., The effects of 10% front load carriage on the likelihood of slips and falls, Industrial Health, 2008, 46: 32–39. 10.2486/indhealth.46.32.
  26. Carolyn, J.P., Jeevaka, B.K., Kara, M.H., Camille, J.S., Anne, M., William, H.G., The effects of anterior load carriage on lower limb gait parameters during obstacle clearance, Gait Posture, 2010, 32: 57–61. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.003.
  27. Chardon, M., Barbieri, F.A., Petit, P., Vuillerme, N., Reliability of obstacle-crossing parameters during overground walking in young adults, Sensors, 2024, 24: 3387. 10.3390/s24113387.
  28. Bing, Y., David, A.G., Larry, N., Kai Nan, A., Estimate of the Optimum cutoff frequency for the butterworth low-pass digital filter, J. Appl. Biomech., 1999, 15(3): 318–329. 10.1123/jab.15.3.318.
  29. Ohtsu, H., Togashi, R., Hiramuki, M., Yoshida, S., Minamisawa, T., Kanzaki, H., How does wearing slippers affect the movement strategy while crossing over an obstacle? Gait Posture, 2021, 86: 17–21. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.02.022.
  30. Gröble, S., van Hedel, H.J.A., Keller, J.W., Ammann-Reiffer, C., Differences in gait parameters when crossing real versus projected everyday life obstacles in healthy children and adolescents, Sci. Rep., 2023, 13: 7848. 10.1038/s41598-023-34276-8.
  31. Stegemöller, E.L., Buckley, T.A., Pitsikoulis, C., Barthelemy, E., Roemmich, R., Hass, C.J., Postural instability and gait impairment during obstacle crossing in Parkinson’s disease, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2012, 93: 703–709. 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.004.
  32. Wang, C., Guo, Y., Du, W., Li, Z., Chen, W., Gender differences in joint biomechanics during obstacle crossing with different heights, Bioengineering, 2025, 12: 189. 10.3390/bioengineering12020189.
  33. da Silva, J.J., Barbieri, F.A., Gobbi, L.T.B., Adaptive locomotion for crossing a moving obstacle, Motor Control, 2011, 15: 419–433. 10.1123/mcj.15.3.419.
  34. Nicole, C.M., Lesley, A.B., Obstacle negotiation kinematics: age-dependent effects of postural threat, Gait Posture, 2004, 19: 226–234. 10.1016/s0966-6362(03)00060-2.
  35. Timmis, M.A., Buckley, J.G., Obstacle crossing during locomotion: visual exproprioceptive information is used in an online mode to update foot placement before the obstacle but not swing trajectory over it, Gait Posture, 2012, 36: 160–162. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.008.
  36. Chris, K.R., Shirley, R., Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory, Neurosci. Lett., 2007, 418: 60–65. 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.063.
  37. Miura, Y., Shinya, M., Foot clearance when crossing obstacles of different heights with the lead and trail limbs, Gait Posture, 2021, 88: 155–160. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.020.
  38. Shota, H., Motoki, K., Visuomotor transformation for the lead leg affects trail leg trajectories during visually guided crossing over a virtual obstacle in humans, Front. Neurosci., 2020, 14: 357. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00357.
  39. Jonathan, M., Brett, R.F., Visual control of foot placement when walking over complex terrain, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 2014, 40: 106–115. 10.1037/a0033101.
  40. Rosenblum, U., Lavi, A., Fischer, A.G., Parmet, Y., Haim, A., Handelzalts, S., The effect of arm restriction on dynamic stability and upper-body responses to lateral loss of balance during walking: an observational study, R. Soc. Open Sci., 2024, 11: 241156. 10.1098/rsos.241156.
  41. Yang, J., Mo, Z., Zhang, Y., Ji, R., Tao, C., Fan, Y., The effects of walking aids on shoulder joint kinematics in older persons: an initial study, BMC Geriatrics, 2023, 23: 743. 10.1186/s12877-023-04439-3.
  42. Severe, C., Kent, J.A., Hammond, 2nd P., Major, M.J., Dynamic balance of persons with unilateral upper limb absence when responding to a walking disturbance, Hum. Mov. Sci., 2025, 100: 103338. 10.1016/j.humov.2025.103338.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/abb/218841 | Journal eISSN: 2450-6303 | Journal ISSN: 1509-409X
Language: English
Page range: 62 - 72
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 3, 2026
Published on: Sep 29, 2026
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Jingjing Guo, Meizhen Wei, Zisheng Peng, Meizhen Zhang, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.