Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Beyond Interoperability: Conceptualizing the European Judicial Data Space as a Socio-Techno-Legal Infrastructure Cover

Beyond Interoperability: Conceptualizing the European Judicial Data Space as a Socio-Techno-Legal Infrastructure

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Abstract

Data-oriented justice is often portrayed as a set of digital applications and services designed to enhance judicial cooperation, efficiency, and access to justice within the European Union. This paper offers a different interpretation. It approaches the emerging European Judicial Data Space (EJDS) as a socio-techno-legal information infrastructure in the making. Drawing on information infrastructure theory and socio-legal analysis, the paper examines how the EJDS is likely to develop from an installed base of existing legal instruments, technical standards, organizational arrangements, and digital justice infrastructures. The analysis focuses on three illustrative examples: e-CODEX, the European Criminal Records Information System and its third-country nationals extension (ECRIS/ECRIS-TCN), and JUDEX. These examples show that interoperability in European digital justice is not simply a technical design objective, but an iterative process of legal, semantic, organizational, and institutional change and alignment. They also show that judicial data infrastructures evolve incrementally, through adaptation, reuse, and reconfiguration of existing components, rather than through linear implementation according to a single blueprint. The paper argues that the EJDS should therefore be understood as a layered and evolving assemblage of legal, technical, and institutional elements. Its development raises important questions of governance, accountability, standardization, legal diversity, and institutional control. Building a European judicial data infrastructure is not only a matter of technical interoperability or regulatory compliance; it requires reflexive, inclusive, and adaptive governance capable of sustaining trust, procedural fairness, and public value across diverse justice systems.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.802 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 7
Published on: Jul 28, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Elena Alina Onţanu, Alexandra Tsvetkova, Marco Velicogna, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.