Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Contextual Relationship with Access to Justice: Parameters That Impact the Brazilian Courts Cover

The Contextual Relationship with Access to Justice: Parameters That Impact the Brazilian Courts

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Albiston, Catherine, and Rebecca L. Sandefur. “Expanding the Empirical Study of Access to Justice.” Wisconsin Law Review 2013, no. 1 (June 2013): 101120.
  2. Bottini, Pierpaolo Cruz. “A Reforma Do Judiciário: Aspectos Relevantes.” Revista Da Escola Nacional Da Magistratura 2, no. 3 (April 2007): 8999.
  3. Box, G. E. P., and D. R. Cox. “An Analysis of Transformations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 26, no. 2 (April 1964): 211252. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
  4. Brazil. “Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988.” Presidency of the Republic (Brasília), 1988. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.
  5. Brazil. “Law No. 13,429, of March 31, 2017: Provides for Amendments to Legal Provisions on Temporary Work in Urban Enterprises and on Labor Relations in Companies That Provide Services to Third Parties.” Presidency of the Republic, March 2017. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/lei/l13429.htm.
  6. Brinks, Daniel M. “Access to What? Legal Agency and Access to Justice for Indigenous Peoples in Latin America.” The Journal of Development Studies 55, no. 3 (March 2019): 348365. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1451632
  7. Bryner, Nicholas S. “Brazil’s Green Court: Environmental Law in the Superior Tribunal de Justiça (High Court of Brazil).” Pace Environmental Law Review 29, no. 2 (April 2012): 470470. DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1694
  8. Carneiro, Rodrigo Alvares. “The Importance of the Theory of the Costs of the Right to the Study of Access to Justice in the Brazilian Judicial Courts.” Revista Acadêmica Da Faculdade de Direito Do Recife 90, no. 2 (December 2018): 218244. DOI: 10.51359/2448-2307.2018.237649
  9. Castelliano, Caio, and Tomas Aquino Guimaraes. “Court Disposition Time in Brazil and in European Countries.” Revista Direito GV 19 (2023): e2302e2302. DOI: 10.1590/2317-6172202302
  10. Castro, Alexandre Samy. “Court Performance in Brazil: Evidence from Judicature-Level Data.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2009. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2612941
  11. Chappe, Nathalie, and Marie Obidzinski. “The Impact of the Number of Courts on the Demand for Trials.” International Review of Law and Economics 37 (March 2014): 121125. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2013.09.002
  12. CNJ. Índice de Acesso à Justiça. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2021. https://bibliotecadigital.cnj.jus.br/jspui/bitstream/123456789/487/1/Relatorio_Indice-de-Acesso-a-Justica_LIODS_29-4-2021.pdf.
  13. CNJ. “Justice 4.0.” Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2024. https://www.cnj.jus.br/tecnologia-da-informacao-e-comunicacao/justica-4-0/.
  14. CNJ. Justice in Numbers 2017: Year-Base 2016. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2017. https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/b60a659e5d5cb79337945c1dd137496c.pdf.
  15. CNJ. Justice in Numbers 2020: Year-Base 2019. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2020. https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/rel-justica-em-numeros2020.pdf.
  16. CNJ. Justice in Numbers 2021: Year-Base 2020. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2021. https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/relatorio-justica-em-numeros2021-221121.pdf.
  17. Dalton, Teresa, and Jordan M. Singer. “Bigger Isn’t Always Better: An Analysis of Court Efficiency Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.” Pace Law Review (Teaneck) 34, no. 3 (December 2014): 11691189. DOI: 10.58948/2331-3528.1869
  18. Dias, Eduardo, Woska Pires Costa, Michele Silva Valadão Fernandes, Priscilla Rayanne E. Silva Noll, and Matias Noll. “Teachers’ Quality of Life Perception during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review Protocol.” Journal of Human Growth and Development, 2023. DOI: 10.36311/jhgd.v34.15837
  19. Dias, Paulo Cezar, and Heitor Moreira Oliveira. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Brazilian Judiciary: Reflections on a Justice 4.0 and a 100% Digital Judgment in the Post-Pandemic Context.” Athens Journal of Law 9, no. 1 (December 2022): 932. DOI: 10.30958/ajl.9-1-1
  20. Elattar, Zakariae, and Mingque Ye. “The Role and Impact of Institutional Distance on China’s Export Trade with Countries in Africa and Asia.” International Journal of Economics and Finance 15, no. 8 (July 2023): 96105. DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v15n8p96
  21. Farrow, Trevor C. W. “What Is Access to Justice?” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51, no. 3 (April 2014): 957988. DOI: 10.60082/2817-5069.2761
  22. Fávero, Luiz Paulo Lopes, and Patrícia Prado Belfiore. Manual de Análise de Dados: Estatística e Modelagem Multivariada Com Excel, SPSS e Stata. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2017.
  23. Fávero, Luiz Paulo Lopes, Patrícia Prado Belfiore, Fabiana Lopes Silva, and Betty Lilian Chan. Análise de Dados: Modelagem Multivariada Para Tomada de Decisões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2009.
  24. Faustino, Marcella Raphaella, Eduardo Cerqueira Batitucci, and Marcus Vinícius Gonçalves Cruz. “Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice.” Revista Direito GV 19 (2023): e2314e2314. DOI: 10.1590/2317-6172202314
  25. Ferro, Gustavo, Carlos A. Romero, and Exequiel Romero-Gómez. “Efficient Courts? A Frontier Performance Assessment.” Benchmarking: An International Journal 25, no. 9 (November 2018): 34433458. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2017-0244
  26. García-Rubio, Miguel A., and Virginia Rosales-López. “Justice and Economy: Evaluating Judicial Efficiency in Andalusia.” InDret: Revista Para El Análisis Del Derecho 4 (2010): 126.
  27. Gill, Nick, Jennifer Allsopp, Andrew Burridge, Daniel Fisher, Melanie Griffiths, Natalia Paszkiewicz, and Rebecca Rotter. “The Tribunal Atmosphere: On Qualitative Barriers to Access to Justice.” Geoforum 119 (February 2021): 6171. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.002
  28. Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira, Simone Tiêssa Alves, and Jéssica Traguetto Silva. “Effects of Investment in Information and Communication Technologies on Productivity of Courts in Brazil.” Government Information Quarterly 35, no. 3 (September 2018): 480490. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.002
  29. Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira, Simone Tiêssa Jesus Alves, and Jéssica Traguetto Silva. “Relação Entre Investimento Em Tecnologia e Produtividade de Tribunais No Brasil.” Edited by Tomas Aquino Guimarães, Adalmir Oliveira Gomes, and Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho. Brasília: EnAJUS, 2018. https://www.enajus.org.br/anais/assets/papers/2018/020_EnAjus.pdf.
  30. Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira, and Maria Eduarda Mendonça Freitas. “Correlation between Caseload, Number of Judges and Judicial Performance in Brazilian Federal Courts.” Revista Direito GV 13, no. 2 (August 2017): 567585. DOI: 10.1590/2317-6172201722
  31. Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira, and Tomás Aquino Guimarães. “Judicial Performance: Conceptualization, State of the Art and Research Agenda.” Revista de Administração Pública 47, no. 2 (April 2013): 379401. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-76122013000200005
  32. Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira, Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, and Luiz Akutsu. “Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants.” Revista de Administração Contemporânea 21, no. 5 (October 2017): 648665. DOI: 10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179
  33. Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira, Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, and Luiz Akutsu. “The Relationship between Judicial Staff and Court Performance: Evidence from Brazilian State Courts.” International Journal for Court Administration 8, no. 1 (October 2016): 1212. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.214
  34. Gujarati, Damodar N., and Dawn C. Porter. Basic Econometrics. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2009.
  35. Hair Joseph F. Jr., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. New York: Pearson, 2009.
  36. Holston, James. “The Misrule of Law: Land and Usurpation in Brazil.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 33, no. 4 (October 1991): 695725. DOI: 10.1017/S0010417500017291
  37. Hunter, Wendy, and Natasha Borges Sugiyama. “Democracy and Social Policy in Brazil: Advancing Basic Needs, Preserving Privileged Interests.” Latin American Politics and Society 51, no. 2 (January 2009): 2958. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00047.x
  38. Maia, Paula Christianne Gomes Gouveia Souto, Matheus Paiva Emidio Cavalcanti, Fernando Augusto Marinho Santos Figueira, Gabrielle Amaral Virginio Pereira, Woska Pires Costa, and Luiz Carlos Abreu. “Space-Temporal Analysis of the Incidence, Mortality and Case Fatality of COVID-19 in the State of Rio Grande Do Norte, in the Period from 2020 to 2022, in the Northeast of Brazil.” Journal of Human Growth and Development 34, no. 1 (April 2024): 119131. DOI: 10.36311/jhgd.v34.15777
  39. Manz, Renan Marçal, and Marcos Moraes Sousa. “The Relationship between Demand and Performance of Magistrates: Investigation of a Functional Model in the Form of an Inverted U.” Revista de Administração Pública 55, no. 5 (October 2021): 12151231. DOI: 10.1590/0034-761220210027
  40. Ministry of Justice. Atlas of Access to Justice, National Indicators of Access to Justice. Brasília, 2013. https://www.conjur.com.br/dl/at/atlas-acesso-justica-brasil.pdf.
  41. Moraes, Thiago Maia Sayão, Duljon Laerti Boldrin, and Marcos Moraes Sousa. “Innovation in the Judiciary: LIODS and Potential Developments in the Light of the Map of Processes and Results.” Humanidades & Inovação 10, no. 18 (2023): 174185.
  42. Moraes, Thiago Maia Sayão, and Marcos Moraes Sousa. “History Matters: The Institutionalization and Innovation Paradox in the Judiciary.” Social Sciences 13, no. 5 (April 2024): 247247. DOI: 10.3390/socsci13050247
  43. Moreira, Rafaela Selem, and Gisele Cittadino. “Favela’s Individual and Collective Access to Justice under the Brazilian Democratic Constitution: An Overview of 30 Years of Insurgent Peripheral Litigation.” International Journal of Arts, Humanities & Social Science 04, no. 08 (August 2023): 1628. DOI: 10.56734/ijahss.v4n8a3
  44. Oliveira, Carlos Antonio Ferreira, Marcos Moraes Sousa, Mara Célia Ferreira Ataide, Jéssica Traguetto, Woska Pires Costa, and Miguel Matos-Torres. “Legal Reforms and Outcomes of the Action of Police Institutions in Combating Violence against Women: A Systematic Review Protocol.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 24 (April 2025): 114. DOI: 10.1177/16094069251339213
  45. Procopiuck, Mario. “Information Technology and Time of Judgment in Specialized Courts: What Is the Impact of Changing from Physical to Electronic Processing?” Government Information Quarterly 35, no. 3 (September 2018): 491501. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.005
  46. Queiroz, Laryssa Saraiva. “The Prelude of Access to Justice to the Vulnerable People in Brazil.” Revista Da Defensoria Pública Da União, no. 15 (June 2021): 87114. DOI: 10.46901/revistadadpu.i15.p87-114
  47. R Core Team. “The R Project for Statistical Computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Vienna), 2023. https://www.r-project.org/.
  48. Rosales-López, Virginia. “Economics of Court Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” European Journal of Law and Economics 25, no. 3 (June 2008): 231251. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-008-9047-9
  49. Sadek, Maria Tereza. “A Crise Do Judiciário Vista Pelos Juízes: Resultados de Uma Pesquisa Quantitativa.” In Uma Introdução Ao Estudo Da Justiça, edited by Maria Tereza Sadek, 1731. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein, 2010. DOI: 10.7476/9788579820328
  50. Sadek, Maria Tereza Aina. “Acesso à Justiça: Um Direito e Seus Obstáculos.” Revista USP, no. 101 (May 2014): 5566. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i101p55-66
  51. Sadek, Maria Tereza Aina. “Poder Judiciário: Perspectivas de Reforma.” Opinião Pública 10, no. 1 (May 2004): 162. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-62762004000100002
  52. Said Filho, Fernando Fortes. “The Crisis of the Judiciary: Alternative Mechanisms for Resolving Disputes as a Condition of Possibility to Ensure Access to Justice.” DIKÉ 5, no. 1 (2016): 122.
  53. Santos, Boaventura Sousa. “Introdução à Sociologia Da Administração Da Justiça.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, no. 21 (November 1986): 1144.
  54. Santos, Caio Santiago Fernandes. “Access to Justice in Brazil: Notes on the Legal Service Model of the Public Defender’s Office.” Revista Brasileira de Sociologia Do Direito 3, no. 2 (September 2016): 130145. DOI: 10.21910/rbsd.v3n2.2016.59
  55. Sátiro, Renato Máximo. Determinantes Emergentes Da Produtividade Em Tribunais de Justiça Estaduais. (Goiânia), 2019. https://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9327.
  56. Sátiro, Renato Máximo, Jessica Vitorino Martins, and Marcos Moraes Sousa. “The Courts in the Face of the COVID-19 Crisis: An Analysis of the Measures Adopted by the Brazilian Judicial System.” International Journal for Court Administration 12, no. 2 (May 2021): 1010. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.388
  57. Sátiro, Renato Máximo, and Marcos Moraes Sousa. “Quantitative Determinants of Judicial Performance: Factors Associated with the Productivity of the Courts.” Revista Direito GV 17, no. 1 (2021): e2107e2107. DOI: 10.1590/2317-6172202107
  58. Sátiro, Renato Máximo, Marcos Moraes Sousa, and Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia. “Administration of Justice: An Essay on the Dimensions and Explanatory Variables of Judicial Performance.” REAd Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre) 30, no. 3 (December 2024): 15541584. DOI: 10.1590/1413-2311.424.137042
  59. Sauerbronn, Fernanda Filgueiras, and João Felipe Rammelt Sauerbronn. “Social Representations of the Judicial Reform – a Study Based on the Perspectives of the Employees of the Court of Justice of Bahia State.” Revista de Administração Pública 49, no. 3 (June 2015): 719737. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7612130108
  60. Silva, Ricardo Augusto Ferreira, Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, and Marcos Moraes Sousa. “What Judges Think about the Meaning of Their Work.” International Journal for Court Administration 10, no. 1 (February 2019): 5966. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.258
  61. Sousa, Marcos, Daniel Kettiger, and Andreas Lienhard. “E-Justice in Switzerland and Brazil: Paths and Experiences.” International Journal for Court Administration 13, no. 2 (August 2022). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.368
  62. Torlig, Eloisa Gonçalves Silva, and Bernardo Oliveira Buta. “A Relação Entre Acesso Potencial e Efetivo Na Justiça Brasileira.” Edited by Tomas Aquino Guimarães, Adalmir Oliveira Gomes, and Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho. Curitiba: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas Sociais – IBEPES, 2020. https://www.enajus.org.br/anais/assets/papers/2020/sessao-06/1-a-relac-a-o-entre-acesso-potencial-e-efetivo-na-justic-a-brasileira.pdf.
  63. Vasconcelos, Fernando Freire, Renato Máximo Sátiro, Luiz Paulo Lopes Fávero, Gabriela Troyano Bortoloto, and Hamilton Luiz Corrêa. “Analysis of Judiciary Expenditure and Productivity Using Machine Learning Techniques.” Mathematics 11, no. 14 (July 2023): 31953195. DOI: 10.3390/math11143195
  64. Vidal, Josep Pont. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and the State: Is It Emerging a New Configuration of Public Administration.” Cadernos EBAPE.BR 18, no. 4 (October 2020): 924935. DOI: 10.1590/1679-395120200098x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.648 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Jun 12, 2026
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Renato Máximo Sátiro, Marcos de Moraes Sousa, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, Woska Pires da Costa, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.