Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Reform of the Finnish Court Fees Act – Were the Societal Functions of the Administrative Courts and Access to Justice Jeopardized? Cover

The Reform of the Finnish Court Fees Act – Were the Societal Functions of the Administrative Courts and Access to Justice Jeopardized?

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Bhat, P. I. “Quantitative Legal Research.” In Idea and Methods of Legal Research, online ed. Oxford Academic, 23 January 2020. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199493098.001.0001
  2. Council of Europe. European Judicial Systems – CEPEJ Evaluation Report: 2020 Evaluation Cycle (2018 Data). Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2020.
  3. Council of Europe. European Judicial Systems – CEPEJ Evaluation Report: 2022 Evaluation Cycle (2020 Data). Strasbourg: European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, 2022.
  4. Danelius, H., J. Danelius, T. Bull, and I. Cameron. Mänskliga rättigheter i europeisk praxis: En kommentar till Europakonventionen om de mänskliga rättigheterna. Norstedts Juridik, 2023.
  5. Ervo, L. Oikeudenmukainen oikeudenkäynti. Alma Talent, 2005.
  6. Essen, U. von. Processramen i förvaltningsmål: Ändring av talan och anslutande frågor. Wolters Kluwer, 2016.
  7. Government of Finland. Government Bill HE 29/2015 vp: Proposal to the Parliament for an Act on Court Fees. Helsinki: Government of Finland, 2015.
  8. Griswold, E. N. “Rationing Justice: The Supreme Court’s Caseload and What the Court Does Not Do.” Cornell Law Review 60, no. 3 (1974–1975): 33554.
  9. Hakalehto, S. Lapsioikeuden perusteet. Alma Talent, 2018.
  10. Harjula, H., and K. Prättälä. Kuntalaki – Tausta ja tulkinnat. 9th ed. Alma Talent, 2005.
  11. Higgins, A. “Referral Fees – The Business of Access to Justice.” Legal Studies 32, no. 1 (March 2012): 10931. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00214.x
  12. Jokela, A. Oikeudenkäynti I: Oikeudenkäynnin perusteet, periaatteet ja instituutiot. Alma Talent, 2016.
  13. Koivuluoma, A., M. Paso, P. Saukko, V. Tarukannel, and M. Tolvanen. Hallintolainkäyttö. Alma Talent, 2020.
  14. Koskela, T., M. Launiala, and E. Silvennoinen. Impacts of the Reform of the Act on Court Fees (1455/2015): Rapporteurs’ Report. OM 2024:5. Ministry of Justice, 2024.
  15. Launiala, M. “Hallintolainkäytön ennakkopäätösjärjestelmä.” Edilex 2017/44.
  16. Launiala, M., and L. Tammenlehto. “Reformen av lagen om domstolsavgifter i Finland – förvaltningsdomstolarnas samhällsfunktioner fullgörs inte längre på avsett sätt.” Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift 101, no. 3 (2024): 119. DOI: 10.7577/nat.6032
  17. Lubbers, A. O., and L. Stevens. “Economic Obstacles in Access to Courts in Tax Matters.” EC Tax Review 3, no. 3 (1994): 91100. DOI: 10.54648/ECTA1994019
  18. Mäenpää, O. Oikeudenkäynti hallintoasioissa: hallintoprosessioikeuden perusteet. Alma Talent, 2019.
  19. Martínez-Matute, M., and J. S. Mora-Sanguinetti. “Un análisis económico de la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa: el efecto del nuevo criterio de costas y las tasas judiciales.” Papeles de Economía Española 151 (2017): 88101.
  20. McGovern, G., and M. D. Greenberg. Who Pays for Justice? Perspectives on State Court System Financing and Governance. RAND Corporation, 2014.
  21. Mery, R. “Court Fees: Charging the User as a Way to Mitigate Judicial Congestion.” The Latin American and Iberian Journal of Law and Economics 1, no. 1 (2015): Article 7.
  22. Ministry of Justice. Oikeudenhoidon uudistamisohjelma vuosille 2013–2025. OMML 16/2013. Helsinki: Ministry of Justice, 2013.
  23. Mora Sanguinetti, J. S., and M. Martínez Matute. “An Economic Analysis of Court Fees: Evidence from the Spanish Civil Jurisdiction.” European Journal of Law and Economics 47, no. 3 (2019): 321359. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-019-09614-9
  24. Myrsky, M. Ennakkopäätökset verotuksessa. Talentum, 2011.
  25. Shavell, S. “The Fundamental Divergence between the Private and the Social Motive to Use the Legal System.” The Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. S2 (1997): 575612. DOI: 10.1086/468008
  26. Susi, M. “Application of the Access to Court Doctrine by the European Court of Human Rights: Estonia’s Concept of Comprehensive Court Protection.” German Yearbook of International Law 52 (2009): 563600.
  27. Tuomi, J., and A. Sarajärvi. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. eBook. Tammi, 2018.
  28. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Treaty Series 1577. November 1989.
  29. Virolainen, J., and P. Pölönen. Rikosprosessin perusteet: Rikosprosessioikeus I. Alma Talent, 2003.
  30. Virolainen, J., and M. Vuorenpää. “Prosessin päälajit ja tehtävät.” In Prosessioikeus, edited by M. Vuorenpää. Alma Talent, 2021.
  31. Vukcevic, I., and M. Markovic. “Right of Access to the Court and Court Fees: Case Practice of the European Court for Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of Montenegro.” Harmonius: Journal of Legal and Social Studies in South East Europe (2015): 280298.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.632 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 7
Published on: Oct 8, 2025
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Laura Tammenlehto, Mika Launiala, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.