Courts as Anthrobots: Learning from Human Forms of Interaction to Develop a Philosophically Healthy Model for Judicial Automation
By: Katalin Kelemen and Luis de Miranda
References
- Arutyunova KR, Alexandrov YI and Hauser MD, “Sociocultural Influences on Moral Judgments: East-West, Male-Female, and Young-Old”, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016): Article
1334 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01334 - Ashley KD,
Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017). DOI: 10.1017/9781316761380 - Bell J,
Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). DOI: 10.1515/9780776624303 - Benyekhlef K et al,
eAccess to Justice (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2016). - Berthoz A,
Simplexity: Simplifying principles for a complex world (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012). DOI: 10.12987/yale/9780300169348.001.0001 - Bloch E, “The dialectical method” (J. Lamb tr.), Man and World 16(4) (1983), pp. 281–313. DOI: 10.1007/BF01252647
- Bourdieu P,
Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Richard Nice tr, Harvard University Press, 1984). - Brady E,
The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139018098 - Branting LK, Lester JS and Callaway CB, “Automating Judicial Document Drafting: A Discourse-Based Approach”, Artificial Intelligence and Law 6 (1998): pp. 111–149. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008222224966
- Buhanan BG and Headrick TA, ‘Some Speculation About Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning’ (1970) 23 Stanford Law Review
40 . DOI: 10.2307/1227753 - de Miranda L, “Artificial Intelligence and Philosophical Creativity: From Analytics to Crealectics”, Human Affairs 30(4) (2020): pp. 597–607. DOI: 10.1515/humaff-2020-0053
- de Miranda L,
Ensemblance. The Transnational Genealogy of Esprit de Corps (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020). DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474454193.001.0001 - de Miranda L, “Five Principles of Philosophical Health for Critical Times: From Hadot to Crealectics”, EIDOS. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 5(1) (2021): pp. 70–89. DOI: 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0005
- de Miranda L,
Paridaiza (Paris: Plon, 2008). - de Miranda L,
Philosophical Health: Thinking as a Way of Healing (Bloomsbury 2024). DOI: 10.5040/9781350353077 - de Miranda L, Ramamoorthy S and Rovatsos M,
“We, Anthrobot: Learning from Human Forms of Interaction and Esprit de Corps to Develop More Plural Social Robotics” , in J Seibt, M Nørskov and S Schack Andersen (eds), What Social Robots Can and Should Do (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2016), pp. 48–59. - de Montesquieu C,
The Spirit of the Laws (first published 1748) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). - Dworkin R, “Hard cases”, Harvard Law Review 88(6) (1975): pp. 1057–1109. DOI: 10.2307/1340249
- Edwards JS and Rodriguez E, “Remedies against bias in analytics systems”, Journal of Business Analytics 2(1) (2019): pp. 74–87. DOI: 10.1080/2573234X.2019.1633890
- Eisenberg T, Fisher T and Rosen-Zvi I, “Does the Judge Matter? Exploiting Random Assignment on a Court of Last Resort to Assess Judge and Case Selection Effects,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9(2) (2012): pp. 246–290. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01253.x
- European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment (December 2018), <
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/196205/COUNCIL OF EUROPE – European Ethical Charter on the use of AI in judicial systems.pdf >. - Fricker M,
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 - Friedman B, Kahn PH and Borning A,
“Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems” , in Kenneth Einar Himma and Herman T Tavani (eds), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics (Hoboken: Wiley, 2008), pp. 69–101. DOI: 10.1002/9780470281819.ch4 - Georgescu I,
Possibility Theory and the Risk (Dordrecht: Springer, 2012). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24740-8 - Hall M, “Randomness Reconsidered: Modeling Random Judicial Assignment in the U.S. Courts of Appeals”, 7 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7(3) (2010): pp. 574–589. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01189.x
- Hall, MEK,
The Nature of Supreme Court Power (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511933943 - Kaan E, “Syntax and semantics?”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(9) (1999): p. 322. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01376-5
- Kelemen K,
Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Court: A Comparative and Legal Perspective (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018). DOI: 10.4324/9781315590769 - Kelly JM,
A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992). - Kischel U,
Comparative Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2019). - Kling R, “Six Models for the Social Accountability of Computing”, ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 9(2) (1978): pp. 8–18. DOI: 10.1145/958929.958931
- Kluger R,
Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality, 1 . Vintage Books edition (New York, NY: Vintage Books, 2004). - Kondori NF and Rouhani S, Identifying and ranking critical success factors for digital court. Journal of Organisational Change Management 36 (6) pp. 1077–1094. DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-03-2023-0087
- Krych-Appelbaum M et al, “” I Think I Know What You Mean”: The Role of Theory of Mind in Collaborative Communication”, Interaction Studies 8(2) (2007): pp. 267–280. DOI: 10.1075/is.8.2.05kry
- Lord Woolf, Access to Justice Final Report (July 1996) <
https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20060213223540/http://www.dca.gov.uk/civil/final/contents.htm >. - Lucy W, Algorithms and adjudication. Jurisprudence (2023) pp. 1–31. DOI: 10.1080/20403313.2023.2243712
- Lundmark T,
Charting the Divide Between Common and Civil Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199738823.001.0001 - McMahon DM,
Divine fury: A history of genius (New York: Basic Books, 2013) - Merryman JH and Pérez-Perdomo R,
The Civil Law Tradition (4th edn, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019). DOI: 10.1515/9781503607552 - Murphy N and Stoeger WR (eds),
Evolution and emergence: Systems, organisms, persons (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007). DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199204717.001.0001 - O’Barr WM and Conley JM, “Lay Expectations of the Civil Justice System”, Law & Society Review 22(1) (1988): pp. 137–162. DOI: 10.2307/3053564
- Posner RA,
How Judges Think (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2008). - Raichle ME et al, “A Default Mode of Brain Function”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98 (2001): pp. 676–82. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
- Raste S, Singh R, Vaughan J, and Nair VN, “Quantifying Inherent Randomness in Machine Learning Algorithms”, arXiv:2206 (2022), available at SSRN <
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4146989 >. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4146989 - Rawls J,
A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971). - Reiling D,
Technology for Justice: How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform (Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2009). DOI: 10.5117/9789087280710 - Sartor G and Branting K (eds),
Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht: Springer, 1998). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9010-5 - Savola M et al,
Digital Hearings – Civil Procedure and Arbitration (Stockholm: Norstedts 2022). - Siems M,
Comparative Law (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022). - Silva P, Pereira JN and Lima PU, “Institutional Robotics: Institutions for Social Robots”, International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (2015): pp. 825–40. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-015-0300-4
- Sourdin T, “Judge v Robot? Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Decision-Making”, UNSW Law Journal 41(1) (2018): pp. 1114–1133. DOI: 10.53637/ZGUX2213
- Sourdin T and Cornes R,
“Do Judges Need to Be Human? The Implications of Technology for Responsive Judging” , in T Sourdin and A Zariski (eds), The Responsive Judge. International Perspectives (Springer Singapore, 2018), pp. 87–119. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_4 - Susskind R,
Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2017). - Triandis HC and Gelfand MJ, “Converging Measurement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998): pp. 118–28. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.118
- Tushnet MV,
The NAACP’s Legal Strategy against Segregated Education: 1925–1950 (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 2004). - Verona D, Lizama-Mue Y and Suárez JL, “Machine learning’s limitations in avoiding automation of bias”, AI & Society 36(2) (2021): pp. 197–203. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-00996-y
- Wacks R,
Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006). DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780192806918.001.0001 - Wahlgren P,
Automation of Legal Reasoning (Stockholm: Kluwer Juristförlaget, 1992). - Yalcin G et al, Perceptions of Justice by Algorithms. Artificial Intelligence and Law (2023) 31: pp. 269–292. DOI: 10.1007/s10506-022-09312-z
- Zöller Z and Louden RB (eds and tr),
Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). - Zweigert K and Kötz H,
An Introduction to Comparative Law (Tony Weir tr, 3rd edn, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.525 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 2
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Katalin Kelemen, Luis de Miranda, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.