Abuse of Procedural Rights in the Context of Digital Transformation of Justice (the Case of the Russian Federation)
References
- Benyekhlef, K., Bailey, J., Burkell, J. & Gelinas, F. (2016). eAccess to Justice. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2931382
- Bonner, A.T. (2018). E-Justice: Reality or a New-Fashioned Term? The herald of civil process, 8(1), pp. 22–38. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-1-22-38
- Branovitsky, K.L. (2018).
The influence of information technology on civil proceedings . Arbitration and Civil Process, 7, pp. 24–27. - Chekmareva, A. V. (2021). Some issues of digitalization of civil justice in the context of the formation of the information society. Court administrator, 3, pp. 15–19. DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2021-3-15-19
- Collective monograph of the Russian State University of Justice (2020). Transformation and digitalization of legal regulation of public relations in modern realities and pandemic conditions. Kazan, Russia.
- Druzhinkin, E.S. (2013).
E-justice in Russia: some results and development prospects . Economic and Law Issues, 11, pp. 35–40. - Interview of the A. V. Gusev, Director General of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, to the magazine “Judge” No. 5/2020. Retrieved from:
http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=59&item=5309 - Kashanin, A. V., Kozyreva, A. B., & Kurnosova, N. A. (2020).
Information technologies in justice: state and prospects . Russia and the world. Analytical report. Moscow. 80 s. - Lyaskovskiy, I.K. (2020). Consequences of a failure of a party to a civil procedure to attend an online session. Arbitration and Civil Process, 10, pp. 46–50. DOI: 10.18572/1812-383X-2020-10-46-50
- Lyubimova, E.V. (2018). The impact of electronic justice to the issues of jurisdiction of civil and administrative cases. The herald of civil process, 1, pp. 200–211. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-1-200-211
- Official website of the Arbitration Court of the Zabaykalsky Krai. Retrieved from:
https://chita.arbitr.ru/node/13591 (accessed: 05/15/2023). - Poteeva, A.V. (2021). Remote court: advantages and disadvantages. Arbitration disputes, 2(94), pp. 65–72.
- RBC (2022). Retrieved from:
https://www.rbc.ru/politics/16/03/2022/623156979a79472d4014351c (accessed: 06/01/2023). - Reidenberg, J.R. (1998).
Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology . Texas Law Review, 3, pp. 553–584. - Reshetnyak, V.I. & Smagina, E.S. (2017). Information technologies in civil proceedings (Russian and foreign experience): textbook. Moscow: Gorodets, 304 p.
- Resolution of the Nevyansk City Court of the Sverdlovsk Region dated March 30, 2020 in case No. 5-40/2020. Consultant Plus SPS.
- Rusakova, E. P. (2021).
The impact of digitalization on civil litigation in Russia and abroad: the experience of China, India, Singapore, the European Union, the USA, South Africa and some other countries. The dissertation of the doctor of jurisprudence . Moscow. - Shevchenko, I. M. (2020). Participation in an arbitration court session online: some procedural issues. Russian Judge. No. 10. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2020-10-7-12
- Speech by Vyacheslav Lebedev, the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation at the plenary session of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation on May 24, 2022.
- Susskind, R. (2019). Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford University Press. 368 p. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198838364.001.0001
- Talapina, E.V. (2019). Evolution of human rights in the digital era. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law, 3, pp. 122–146. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2019-14-3-talapina
- Tereshchenko, L.K. (2013). Modernization of informational relationships and informational legislation. Monograph. Moscow: The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation: INFRA-M. DOI: 10.12737/1566
- The official site of the super service “Justice Online”. Retrieved from:
https://pravosudieonline.ru (accessed: 05/01/2023). - Tulikov, A.V. (2017). Information security and human rights in the conditions of post-industrial development (theoretical and legal analysis): Thesis.
- Uzelac, A., & Hendrik van Rhee C. (2018). Transformation of Civil Justice. Springer Cham. 420 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97358-6
- Valeev, D.Kh., & Nuriev, A.G. (2019).
The pre-action technical stage of electronic claim filing and its peculiarities within the framework of exercising of the constitutional right to judicial protection in the conditions of digital economy . Russian Judge, 4, pp. 3–7. - Vasilkova, S.V. (2018).
Electronic justice in the civil process: Thesis . Saratov, 251 p. - World Justice Project. Measuring the Justice Gap. URL:
https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/research-and-data/access-justice/measuring-justice-gap - Yarkov, V.V. (2020). Principles of Civil Procedure Law in the Conditions of Deritualization and Dematerialization of Justice. Arbitration and Civil Process, 11, pp. 3–6. DOI: 10.18572/1812-383X-2020-11-3-6
- Zaitseva, L.I. (2020). Modification of the rules of procedural law in a pandemic. Bulletin of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, 2, pp. 130–134. DOI: 10.46279/ASMQ.2020.51.73.010
- Zorkin, V.D. (2018).
Law in the digital world. Reflection on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Legal Forum . Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 7578.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.514 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Dec 11, 2023
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2023 Anastasia Melnikova, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.