Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Abuse of Procedural Rights in the Context of Digital Transformation of Justice (the Case of the Russian Federation) Cover

Abuse of Procedural Rights in the Context of Digital Transformation of Justice (the Case of the Russian Federation)

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Directions of digital development of the Russian civil process.

DIRECTIONS OF DIGITAL DEVELOPMENTCHARACTERISTIC MANIFESTATIONS
Reflecting the openness of justicePlacement of information about the court, the progress of case and extra-procedural appeals on the Internet (with a gradation of the level of access for participants in proceedings and court employees)
Free and unlimited access to court practice materials
Internet broadcasts from the courtroom
Creation of an unified end-to-end information service for arbitration courts and general jurisdiction courts
Aimed at the interaction of the court and the parties in the caseSubmission of documents in electronic form, including interactive forms
Video conferencing and meetings through web conferencing (online meetings), simplification of regulations for them
Implementation of the “Electronic File” service – information on the progress of the case, the possibility of remote access
Audio and video protocoling with automatic transcription and transfer of the minutes of a judgment into text (voice recognition technologies)
Compiling judicial acts in the form of electronic documents
Development of predictive justice, automation and robotization of the consideration of the case (especially in the order of summary and writ proceedings), the introduction of artificial intelligence in the analysis of case materials
Implementation of a special service based on artificial intelligence to predict the timing and results of cases
The practice of an asynchronous or hybrid dispute escalation, presenting legal propositions in the format of video recordings or presentations
Electronic judicial summons
The practice of implementing an electronic complaint procedure and conciliations
Use of digital evidence
Aimed at ensuring the activities of the court and interdepartmental interactionAutomatic distribution of cases
Electronic letters of request
Automation of the functions of the court administration (on the mailing of writ obligatory, materials for conducting a forensic examination)
Implementation of the digital and engineering infrastructure of the courts
Ensuring the protection of information, including personal data
Creation of an electronic database of warrants of attorney and diplomas/certificates of legal representatives
Integration of justice information systems with other state information systems

[i] Source: Compiled by author.

Table 2

Abuse of procedural rights and measures to minimize them in the context of digital transformation of the civil process.

TYPES OF ABUSESPECIFIC LEGAL MALPRACTICEMINIMIZATION MEASURES, COUNTERMEASURES
Abuses using the online court session systemThe choice of software for the harm-doing to the opposing partyImplementation of a unified service for all trials via web conferences
Denial of right
Footdragging of the case (failure simulation, hacking, default in appearance and ambages)IT support
Assignment of procedural risks to unfair persons
Availability of grounds for refusal to satisfy petition for transfer to online court session
Criterion of timeliness
Use of unreliable and counterfeited evidenceSending written materials separately, in electronic form (with a preliminary visual check by specialists)
Denial of right
Substitution of representativeUser authentication
Abuses with the implementation of electronic document managementContradictory procedural behavior (declaration of multiple and (or) frivolous petitions with subsequent revocation)Procedural estoppel
Filing applications not on one’s own behalfAssignment of litigation costs (compensation for lost time)
Usage of enhanced qualified digital signature
Authentication
Presentation of storage medium that cannot be readSetting of a legally defined list of storage medium
Denial of right

[i] Source: Compiled by author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.514 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Dec 11, 2023
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Anastasia Melnikova, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.