Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of Court Services and ICT: The Case of Greek Justice Cover

Quality of Court Services and ICT: The Case of Greek Justice

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Ahmed Rozha K. and Muhammed, Khder H. and Lips, Silvia and Nyman-Metcalf, Katrin and Pappel, Ingrid and Draheim, Dirk, 2021, A Legal Framework for Digital Transformation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4182028 (accessed 30 October 2022).
  2. Argyros P. Antonis, 2015. The just satisfaction due to exceeding the reasonable duration of the trial, Sakkoulas publications.
  3. Batalli M., 2011. Simplification of public administration through use of ICT and other tools, European Journal of ePractice, N. 12, March/April 2011.
  4. Brown, T. J., Gilbert A., Churchill Jr., and Peter P., 1993. Improving the measurement of service quality Journal of Retailing Volume 69, Issue 1, Spring 1993, pp. 127139. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(05)80006-5
  5. Buscaglia Edgardo, Dakolias Maria, 1999. An analysis of the causes of corruption in the judiciary, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
  6. Cerrillo i Martínez Agustí and Pere Fabra i Abat. E-Justice: Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2009. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4
  7. Contini F. (ed.), 2017. Handle with care: Assessing and designing methods for evaluation and development of the quality of justice. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/download/56021957/Contini_ed_Handle_with_Care_88-97439-08-0.pdf (accessed 25 October 2023)
  8. Contini, F., & Cordella, A. (2016). Law and technology in civil judicial procedures?. The Oxford handbook of the law and regulation of technology, 246268. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.47
  9. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A., 1994. Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality?. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125131. DOI: 10.1177/002224299405800110
  10. Crosby, L., Evans, K., Cowler, D., 1990. Relationship Quality in Services Spellings: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective, Journal of Marketing, July, 6881. DOI: 10.1177/002224299005400306
  11. Darell, M. W., 2004. E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes, Public Administration Review Volume 64, Issue 1, pp. 1527. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
  12. Damtew, Gosheye, Assessment of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: Federal Supreme- Court in Focus, St.Mary’s University, May 2015. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1813
  13. Deligiannis AP, Anagnostopoulos D, 2017. Towards Open Justice: ICT Acceptance in the Greek Justice System the Case of the Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil Procedures (OSDDY/PP), Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM), IEEE Computer Society, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/CeDEM.2017.26
  14. Directorate – General for Employment, A. and I. & Commission, E., 2017. Quality of public administration: a toolbox for practitioners. Principles and values of good governance. Publications Office of the European Union. Belgium.
  15. Donnelly, M., Wisniewski, M., Dalrymple, J. F. and Curry, C., 1995. Measuring service quality in local government: the SERVQUAL approach, International Journal of public sector management, vol 8 no 7, pp. 1520. DOI: 10.1108/09513559510103157
  16. Dori, Adriani, 2015, The EU Justice Scoreboard – Judicial Evaluation as a New Governance Tool, MPI Luxembourg Working Paper Series, 2, pp. 2435. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2752571
  17. Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, p. 228.
  18. EU Commission (2013), The EU Justice scoreboard, COM(2013) 160 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0160.
  19. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Study on the functioning of judicial systems in the EU Member States Facts and figures from the CEPEJ questionnaires 2012 to 2019, Part 2 – Country fiches for each EU Member States (2019), Strasbourg, 12.03.2021, Greece: p. 656.
  20. Fabri, M., 2021. Will COVID-19, Accelerate Implementation of ICT in Courts? International Journal for Court Administration 2.12(2). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.384
  21. Fabri, M., & Langbroek, P. M. (Eds.), 2000. The challenge of change for judicial systems, developing a public administration perspective. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press OHMSHA, pp. 89.
  22. Fang, Z., 2002. E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of the Computer, The Internet and Management, Vol. 10, No 2, 2002, pp. 122.
  23. Gomes, A. O., Guimaraes, T. A., & Akutsu, L. (2016), “The relationship between judicial staff and court performance: evidence from Brazilian state courts”, International Journal for Court Administration, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1219. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.214
  24. Greek Company of Judicial Studies, 2015. Contribution to the effectiveness of justice. Athens: Publications Law Library.
  25. Gronroos, C. (1984) A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18, 3644. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000004784
  26. Human Rights Reports (HRR) 2017, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Greece. Available at: https://www.state.gov/reports/2017-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/greece/
  27. Lewis, B. and Mitchell, V. (1990) Defining and Measuring the Quality of Customer Service. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 8, 1117. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000001086
  28. Lupo, G. and Bailey, J., 2014. Designing and Implementing e-Justice Systems: Some Lessons Learned from EU and Canadian Examples, Laws 2014, 3, pp. 353387. DOI: 10.3390/laws3020353
  29. McKoy, Grace Angela, An investigation into service quality in the Supreme Court civil registry in Jamaica: Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, Edinburgh Napier, 2018.
  30. Mitsopoulos, Michael S., & Pelagidis, Theodore, Greek Appeals Courts’ Quality Analysis and Performance (January 1, 2010). European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1739, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1840578
  31. Murillo, Rodrigo, 2014, Understanding the service quality perception gaps between judicial servants and judiciary users, IJCA Vol. 6, pp. 84105. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.146
  32. OECD (2021), Economic Policy Reforms 2021: Going for Growth: Shaping a Vibrant Recovery, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/3c796721-en
  33. Pangalos, G., Salmatzidis, I., & Pagkalos, I., 2014, Using IT to provide easier access to cross-border legal procedures for citizens and legal professionals-implementation of a European payment order E-CODEX pilot, IJCA Vol. 6, pp. 4352. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.137
  34. Papaioannou, Elias and Karatza, Stavroula, The Greek Justice System: Collapse and Reform (February 2018). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12731. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3126245
  35. Parasuraman, A. Parsu, & Zeithaml, Valarie & Berry, Leonard, 1985. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implication for Future Research (SERVQUAL). The Journal of Marketing. 49. 4150. DOI: 10.1177/002224298504900403
  36. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V., & Berry, L., 1988. SERVQUAL a Multi-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing Vol.64 Fall, pp. 1240.
  37. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., Berry, L. L., 1991. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 67 No. 4, pp. 420450.
  38. Patterson, C. T., 2009. Toward Service Excellence: A Preliminary Assessment of Service Quality in Georgia Courts. Institute of Court Management. Court Excellence Development Program. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Administrative Office of Courts of Georgia.
  39. Stergiopoulou, C., 2004. Service quality in Greek insurance. Unpublished Student Thesis, TEI of Crete.
  40. Stiakakis, E. and Georgiadis, C. K., 2009. E-service quality: comparing the perceptions of providers and customers, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 19 Iss 4, pp. 410430. DOI: 10.1108/09604520910971539
  41. Tsoukatos, Evangelos, 2007. Customer behaviour, service quality and the effects of culture: A quantitative analysis in Greek insurance (PhD Thesis).
  42. Velicogna, M., 2007. Justice Systems and ICT: What Can Be Learned from Europe? Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 129147. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.41
  43. Velicogna, M., 2007. Use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in European judicial systems, CEPEJ Studies No. 7.
  44. Velicogna, M., 2011. Electronic access to justice: From theory to practice and back. Droit et cultures. Revue internationale interdisciplinaire, (61). DOI: 10.4000/droitcultures.2447
  45. Velicogna, Marco, Justice Systems and ICT: What Can Be Learned from Europe? Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 129147, June 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=998246. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.41
  46. Velicogna, M., & Lupo, G., 2017, From drafting common rules to implementing electronic European civil procedures: The rise of e-CODEX. In From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 181212. DOI: 10.5771/9783845285214-181
  47. Velicogna, M., & Ng, G. Y. 2006. Legitimacy and Internet in the Judiciary: A lesson from the Italian Courts’ websites experience?. International Journal of law and information technology, 14(3), 370389. DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eal009
  48. Velicogna, M., Steigenga, E., Taal, S., & Schmidt, A. 2020. Connecting EU jurisdictions: Exploring how to open justice across member states through ICT?. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 274294. DOI: 10.1177/0894439318786949
  49. Wisniewski, M. and Donnelly, M., 1996. Measuring service quality in the public sector: the potential for SERVQUAL, Total Quality Management, Vol.7, No. 4, pp. 357365. DOI: 10.1080/09544129650034710
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.489 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Efthymia Chatziioannou, Maria Giannakourou, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.