Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of Court Services and ICT: The Case of Greek Justice Cover

Quality of Court Services and ICT: The Case of Greek Justice

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Organization Chart of Courts in Greece.

Source: official website of the Greek Ministry of Justice. Available at: https://www.ministryofjustice.gr/?page_id=612 (accessed 30 October 2022).

Table 1

Average scores of Lawyers’ and Employees’ service quality perceptions per item.

MEAN (LAWYERS)STD. DEVIATION (LAWYERS)MEAN (EMPLOYEES)STD. DEVIATION (EMPLOYEES)
TA1 Up-to-date equipment1,93,6401,67,661
TA2 Visual appealing physical facilities2,00,7431,70,837
TA3 Neat Court staff2,90,8033,87,819
TA4 Visually appealing materials2,47,9002,40,968
RL1 Provide services at a predetermined time3,071,0484,101,029
RL2 Interest in solving customers’ problems3,23,8984,40,770
RL3 Performing services right the first time3,03,8504,13,681
RL4 Service in accordance with what has been promised or agreed3,40,8144,23,817
RL5 Error-free service2,93,9444,10,712
RS1 Knowing the exact time when service will be performed3,201,0314,37,765
RS2 Court employees provide prompt service3,37,7184,40,621
RS3 Willingness to respond to the customers’ requests3,00,7884,47,776
RS4 Court staff has time to answer customers’ questions2,97,9284,20,997
AS1 Court staff instils confidence3,03,7654,23,679
AS2 Feeling safe and secure2,731,0152,87,900
AS3 Courteous court staff2,90,9604,60,621
AS4 Court staff has knowledge to answer questions2,93,8683,97,718
EM1 Providing individual attention2,80,8473,901,242
EM2 Convenient opening hours3,331,1554,171,053
EM3 Court staff provides personal attention2,50,8203,87,937
EM4 Customers’ best interests at heart2,83,7914,07,907
EM5 Understanding customers’ specific needs3,03,7654,17,791
Overall Mean of Lawyers SERVQUAL 22 items2,8909,461173,8120,39384
Table 2

Independent Samples Test results of comparisons of lawyers’ and court staff’s perceptions.

LEVENE’S TEST FOR EQUALITY OF VARIANCEST-TEST FOR EQUALITY OF MEANS
FSIG.TDFSIG. (2-TAILED)MEAN DIFFERENCESTD. ERROR DIFFERENCE95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OF THE DIFFERENCE
LOWERUPPER
TAEqual variances assumed,079,780,64958,519,08333,12834–,17356,34023
Equal variances not assumed,64957,859,519,08333,12834–,17357,34024
RLEqual variances assumed,113,7387,52558,0001,06000,14087  ,778011,34199
Equal variances not assumed7,52556,687,0001,06000,14087  ,777871,34213
RSEqual variances assumed,355,5537,54658,0001,22500,16234  ,900051,54995
Equal variances not assumed7,54657,891,0001,22500,16234  ,900041,54996
ASEqual variances assumed1,827,1826,99758,0001,01667,14530  ,725821,30751
Equal variances not assumed6,99753,567,0001,01667,14530  ,725311,30802
EMPEqual variances assumed1,774,1886,41158,0001,13333,17677  ,779481,48718
Equal variances not assumed6,41156,755,0001,13333,17677  ,779321,48735
SERVQUAL 22 itemsEqual variances assumed,649,4248,31958,000,92107,11072  ,699431,14270
Equal variances not assumed8,31956,613,000,92107,11072  ,699321,14282
Table 3

One-way ANOVA results for Lawyers and Court Staff.

LAWYERSGENDERAGEYEARS OF OCCUPATIONFREQUENCYEMPLOYEESGENDERAGEJOB POSITIONYEARS OF EMPLOYMENTLEVEL OF EDUCATION
SIG.SIG.SIG.SIG.SIG.SIG.SIG.SIG.SIG.
TA_LAWBetween Groups,543,331,620,623TA_EMBetween Groups,925,894,173,703,573
Within GroupsWithin Groups
TotalTotal
RL_LAWBetween Groups,099,639,797,685RL_EMBetween Groups,969,139,228,024,124
Within GroupsWithin Groups
TotalTotal
RS_LAWBetween Groups,929,462,545,548RS_EMBetween Groups,062,804,535,171,014
Within GroupsWithin Groups
TotalTotal
AS_LAWBetween Groups,909,852,986,955AS_EMBetween Groups,883,614,678,122,979
Within GroupsWithin Groups
TotalTotal
EMP_LAWBetween Groups,354,457,539,497EMP_EMBetween Groups,096,893,101,058,117
Within GroupsWithin Groups
TotalTotal
QUAL_LAWBetween Groups,726,868,825,789QUAL_EMBetween Groups,200,778,199,041,242
Within GroupsWithin Groups
Total
Figure 2

The percentage significance of the SERVQUAL dimensions (Lawyers).

Figure 3

The percentage significance of the SERVQUAL dimensions (Employees).

Figure 4

Mean of Lawyers’ perceptions.

Figure 5

Mean of Court Employees’ perceptions.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.489 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Efthymia Chatziioannou, Maria Giannakourou, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.