Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Best Practices and Beyond: Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Courts in a U.S. Southern State Cover

Best Practices and Beyond: Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Courts in a U.S. Southern State

Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Altheimer, I., Duda-Banwar, J., & Schreck, C. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on community-based violence interventions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 810819. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-020-09547-z
  2. American Psychological Association. (2021). U.S. adults report highest stress level since early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2021/02/adults-stress-pandemic.
  3. Baker, E. (2020). The crisis that changed everything: Reflections of and reflections on COVID-19. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 28(4), 311331. DOI: 10.1163/15718174-28040001
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J Manage Psychol, 22, 309328. DOI: 10.1108/02683940710733115
  5. Banks, D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2003). The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(2), 385412. DOI: 10.1177/002204260303300206
  6. Boals, A., & Banks, J. B. (2020). Stress and cognitive functioning during a pandemic: Thoughts from stress researchers. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S255S257. DOI: 10.1037/tra0000716
  7. Boone, M., & Langbroek, P. M. (2018). Problem-solving justice: Europeanapproaches. Utrecht Law Review, 14(3), 16. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.478
  8. Bowen, P., & Whitehead, S. (2015). Problem-solving courts: An evidence review. London: Centre for Justice Innovation.
  9. Bureau of Justice Administration. (2020). Treatment courts and COVID-19: Adapting operations. BJA. https://bja.ojp.gov/library/publications/treatment-courts-and-covid-19-adapting-operations
  10. Carey, S. M., Finigan, M. W., & Pukstas, K. (2008). Exploring the key components of drug courts: A comparative study of 18 adult drug courts on practices, outcomes and costs. NPC Research. http://www.npcresearch.com/Files/NIJ_Cross-site_Final_Report_0308.pdf. DOI: 10.1037/e495592008-001
  11. Carey, S. M., Mackin, J. R., & Finigan, M. W. (2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 642.
  12. Cullen, F., Link, B., Wolfe, N., & Frank, J. (1985). The social dimensions of correctional officer stress. Justice Quarterly, 2, 505533. DOI: 10.1080/07418828500088711
  13. De Carlo, A., Dal Corso, L., Carluccio, F., Colledani, D., & Falco, A. (2020). Positive supervisor behaviors and employee performance: The serial mediation of workplace spirituality and work engagement. Front Psychology, 11, 1834. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01834
  14. de Koning, R., Egiz, A., Kotecha, J., Ciuculete, A. C., Ooi, S. Z. Y., Bankole, N. D. A., Erhabor, J., Higginbotham, G., Khan, M., Dalle, D. U., Sichimba, D., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Kanmounye, U. S. (2021). Survey fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of neurosurgery survey response rates. Frontiers in Surgery, 8, 690680. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.690680
  15. Dillman, D. D., Smythe, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design model. New Jersey: Wiley.
  16. Fabri, M. (2021). Will COVID-19 accelerate implementation of ICT in courts? International journal of court administration, 12(1). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.384
  17. Farole, D. J., & Cissner, A. B. (2007). Seeing eye to eye: Participant and staff perspectives on drug courts. In G. Berman, M. Rempel & R.V. Wolf (Eds.), Documenting Results: Research on Problem-Solving Justice (pp. 5173). New York: Center for Court Innovation.
  18. Gavin, P., & Kawalek, A. (2020). Viewing the Dublin Drug Treatment Court through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence. International journal of court administration, 11(1). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.298
  19. Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2002). An honest chance: Perspectives on drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14(6), 369372. DOI: 10.1525/fsr.2002.14.6.369
  20. Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., & Bushway, S. D. (2008). Substance use, drug treatment, and crime: An examination of intra-individual variation in a drug court population. Journal of Drug Issues, 38(2), 601630. DOI: 10.1177/002204260803800211
  21. Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., Najaka, S. S., & Rocha, C. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research on Crime & Delinquency, 44(1), 335. DOI: 10.1177/0022427806291271
  22. Griffith, J. D., Rowan-Szal, G. A., Roark, R. R., & Simpson, D. D. (2000). Contingency management in outpatient methadone maintenance treatment: A meta-analysis. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 58(1), 5566.
  23. Gutierrez, L., & Bourgon, G. (2009). Drug treatment courts: A quantitative review of study and treatment quality. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
  24. Hagger, M. S., Smith, S. R., Keech, J. J., Moyers, S. A., & Hamilton, K. (2020). Predicting social distancing intention and behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrated social cognition model. Annals of behavioral medicine: A publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 54(10), 713727.
  25. Hardin, C., & Sydow, N. (2020, March 26). Treatment Courts and COVID-19: Pandemic Guidance (Webinar). Available at: https://vimeo.com/401116822.
  26. Harrell, A., Cavanagh, S., & Roman, J. (1999). Findings From the Evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program: Final Report. The Urban Institute. DOI: 10.1037/e514052006-001
  27. Harrell, A., & Roman, J. (2001). Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 207231. DOI: 10.1177/002204260103100111
  28. Hawken, A., & Kleiman, M. (2009). Managing drug involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE (NCJRS No. 229023). National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/229023.pdf. DOI: 10.1037/e513502010-001
  29. Hora, P. F., Schma, W., & Rosenthal, J. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439538.
  30. Howe, A. (2020, April 16). Courtroom access: Faced with a pandemic, the Supreme Court pivots. Retrieved from https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/04/courtroom-access-faced-with-a-pandemic-the-supreme-courtpivots/.
  31. Hurley, L., & Chung, A. (2020, April 13). A U.S. Supreme Court first: Arguments by teleconference including major one involving Trump. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-trumpfinances/u-s-supreme-court-to-hear-cases-by-teleconference-including-major-one-involving-trumpidUSKCN21V1D4.
  32. Ibusuki, M. (2019). On implementing a therapeutic jurisprudence-based criminal justice system in Japan. International journal of law and psychiatry, 63, 6367. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.07.007
  33. Ivkovic, S. K., & Maskaly, J. (2022). Crime, criminal justice system, and the COVID-19 pandemic. International Criminology, 2, 14. DOI: 10.1007/s43576-022-00053-2
  34. Janson, M., Sharkey, J., & Del Cid, D. (2021). Predictors of mental health outcomes in grocery store workers amid the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for workplace safety and moral injury. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168675
  35. Jones, C. G., & Kemp, R. I. (2013). The strength of the participant-judge relationship predicts better drug court outcomes. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law (Online). DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2013.798392
  36. Kawalek, A. G. (2021). Problem-Solving Courts, Criminal Justice, and the International Gold Standard: Reframing the English and Welsh Drug Courts. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003029946
  37. Kilmer, B., Nicosia, N., Heaton, P., & Midgette, G. (2012). Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Project. American Journal of Public Health, 103(1), 3743. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989
  38. Kinlock, T. M., Gordon, M. S., Schwartz, R. P., & O’Grady, K. E. (2013). Individual patient and program factors related to prison and community treatment completion in prison-initiated methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52(8), 509528. DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2013.782936
  39. Kirby, K. C., Lamb, R. J., Iguchi, M. Y., Husband, S. D., & Platt, J. J. (1995). Situations occasioning cocaine use and cocaine abstinence strategies. Addiction, 90(9), 12411252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb01093.x
  40. Koehler, J. A., Humphreys, D. K., Akoensi, T. D., Sánchez de Ribera, O., & Lösel, F. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of European drug treatment programmes on reoffending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(6), 584602. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.804921
  41. Koman, R. N. (2018). It is not about the drugs. A comparative and contextual analysis of Singapore and European drug approaches. Beijing Law Review, 9, 439. DOI: 10.4236/blr.2018.93027
  42. Koob, J., Brocato, J., & Kleinpeter, C. (2011). Enhancing residential treatment for drug court participants. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(5), 252271.
  43. Kornhauser, R. (2018). The effectiveness of Australia’s drug courts. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 7698. DOI: 10.1177/0004865816673412
  44. Lerner-Wren, G., & Eckland, R. A. (2018). A court of refuge: Stories from the bench of America’s first mental health court. Beacon Press.
  45. Lucas, P. A. (2018). An exploratory study of veterans treatment court peer mentors: Roles, experiences, and expectations. Drug Court Review, 5985.
  46. Lucas, P. A. (2020). A criminological fly in the ointment? A reply to Pratt and Turanovic’s misinterpretation of problem-solving court ideology toward participant generality of deviance. Victims & Offenders, 16(5), 631642.
  47. Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 79104. DOI: 10.1177/147078530805000107
  48. Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press.
  49. Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Foltz, C., Lee, P. A., & Patapis, N. S. (2005). Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(2), 183198. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.636
  50. Marlowe, D. B., Hardin, C. D., & Fox, C. L. (2016). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving courts in the United States. Technical Report. National Drug Court Institute (NADCP).
  51. Marques, P. H., Jesus, V., Olea, S. A., Vairinhos, V., & Jacinto, C. (2014). The effect of alcohol and drug testing at the workplace on individual’s occupational accident risk. Safety Science, 68, 108120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.007
  52. McCarthy, S., & Christofferson, M. (2020). Treatment courts and COVID-19. Center for Court Innovation.
  53. McKee, M. (2010). San Francisco drug court transitional housing program outcome study. San Francisco: SF Collaborative Courts. Retrieved from http://www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/2676%20Outcome%20on%20SF%20Drug%20Court%20Transitional%20Housing%20Program.pdf.
  54. Miller, C. (2020, June 30). How COVID-19 is impacting California courts: Roundup of services. Retrieved from https://www.law.com/therecorder/2020/06/16/how-covid-19-is-impacting-california-courts-roundupof-services/?slreturn=20200528125509.
  55. Nagin, D. S., & Pogarsky, G. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39(4), 865892. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00943.x
  56. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2018a). Adult drug court best practice standards: Volume 1.
  57. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2018b). Adult drug court best practice standards: Volume 2.
  58. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2020). Treatment courts and COVID-19: What to consider during a pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.nadcp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Treatment-Courts-COVID-19-Examples-3-26-20.pdf.
  59. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2022). Treatment courts work. Retrieved from https://www.nadcp.org/treatment-courts-work/.
  60. National Drug Court Resource Center. (2022). Treatment Court Maps. Retrieved from https://ndcrc.org/interactive-maps/.
  61. National Institute of Justice. (2006, June). Drug courts: The second decade [Special report, NCJ 211081]. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dept. of Justice.
  62. National Public Radio. (2020, March 11). Coronavirus: COVID-19 is now officially a pandemic, WHO says. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/11/814474930/coronavirus-covid-19-is-now-officially-a-pandemic-who-says.
  63. Nolan, J. (2017). Drug courts: In theory and in practice. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203792872
  64. Parker, K., Horowitz, J., & Minkin, R. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic continues to reshape work in America. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/02/16/covid-19-pandemic-continues-to-reshape-work-in-america/
  65. Prison Policy Initiative. (2022, April 1). The most significant criminal justice policy changes from the COVID-19 pandemic. Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/virus/virusresponse.html.
  66. Sanders, A. (2020). Video-hearings in Europe before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.379
  67. Satel, S. (1998). Observational study of courtroom dynamics in selected drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 4372.
  68. Saum, C. A., Scarpitti, F. R., Butzin, C. A., Perez, V. W., Jennings, D., & Gray, A. R. (2002). Drug court participants’ satisfaction with treatment and the court experience. Drug Court Review, 4(1), 3983.
  69. Schleifer, R., Ramírez Hernández, T. T., Ward, E., & Williams, C. W. (2018). Drug Courts in the Americas. New York: DSD Program of the Social Science Research Council.
  70. Schuler, M. S., Griffin, B. A., Ramchand, R., Almirall, D., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment for adolescent substance use: Is biological drug testing sufficient? Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 75(2), 358370. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.358
  71. Shaffer, D. K. (2010). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 493521. DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
  72. Sourdin, T., Li, B., & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health policy and technology, 9(4), 447453. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020
  73. Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020a). COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates. Depression and Anxiety, 37(8), 706714. DOI: 10.1002/da.23071
  74. Taylor, S., Landry, C., Paluszek, M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020b). Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 72, 102232. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232
  75. Turner, S., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., & Deschenes, E. (1999). Perceptions of drug court: How offenders view ease of program completion, strengths and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 6185.
  76. United States Department of Justice. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.
  77. Vîlcicᾰ, E. R., Belenko, S., Hiller, M., & Taxman, F. (2010). Exporting court innovation from the United States to continental Europe: Compatibility between the drug court model and inquisitorial justice systems. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 34(1), 139172. DOI: 10.1080/01924036.2010.9678821
  78. Wexler, D. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An overview. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 17, 125134.
  79. Wexler, D. B. (2014). The international and interdisciplinary project to mainstream therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) in criminal courts: An update, a law school component, and an invitation. Alaska Journal of Dispute Resolution (2014), Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper, (14–04).
  80. Winick, B. J. (1997). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy, and law, 3, 184195. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.1.184
  81. Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2003). Drug treatment court: Therapeutic jurisprudence applied. In B. J. Winick & D. B. Wexler (Eds.), Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts (pp. 479485). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  82. World Health Organization. (2020). Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/29-06-2020-covidtimeline.
  83. Zilius, C., Dahlgren, J., Carey, S., Herrera-Allen, T., Johnson, A., & Aborn, J. (2020). Treatment courts and COVID-19: Adapting operations. NPC Research.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.476 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 2
Published on: Sep 6, 2023
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Paul A. Lucas, Kweilin T. Lucas, Catherine D. Marcum, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.