Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A New Method for an Objective Measurement of the Judicial Workload – the Application of a Prediction Model Based on an Algorithm Formed by Multiple Linear Regression in Court Administration Cover

A New Method for an Objective Measurement of the Judicial Workload – the Application of a Prediction Model Based on an Algorithm Formed by Multiple Linear Regression in Court Administration

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Y. AchenchabeM. Akaaboune [2021]: Yassine Achenchabe – Mohammed Akaaboune, Determinants of Judicial Efficiency in Morocco, Open Journal of Business and Management, (2021) 9, pp. 24072424. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=112005 [accessed 25 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2021.95130
  2. E. Babbie [1996]: Earl Robert Babbie, A társadalomtudományi kutatás gyakorlata, Balassi Kiadó, Budapest, 1996.
  3. M. BeenstockY. Haitovsky [2004]: Michael Beenstock – Yoel Haitovsky, Does the appointment of judges increase the output of the judiciary?, International Review of Law and Economics, 24 (2004) pp. 351369. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4961615_Does_the_appointment_of_judges_increase_the_output_of_the_judiciary [accessed 28 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2004.10.006
  4. J. BełdowskiŁ. DąbrośW. Wojciechowski [2020]: Jarosław Bełdowski – Łukasz Dąbroś – Wiktor Wojciechowski, Judges and court performance: a case study of district commercial courts in Poland, European Journal of Law and Economics, 50 (2020) (1) pp. 171201. https://d-nb.info/1214410073/34 [accessed 30 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-020-09656-4
  5. CEPEJ [2020]: European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Case Weighting in Judicial Systems, CEPEJ Studies No. 28, as adopted by CEPEJ in July 2020, https://rm.coe.int/study-28-case-weighting-report-en/16809ede97 [accessed 17 July 2021]
  6. R. G. ChambersY. ChungR. Färe [1996]: Robert G. Chambers – Yangho Chung – Rolf Färe, Benefit and Distance Functions, Journal of Economic Theory 70 (1996) (2) pp. 407419. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022053196900964 [accessed 28 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1006/jeth.1996.0096
  7. A. CharnesW. W. CooperE. Rhodes [1978]: Abraham Charnes – William W. Cooper – Edwardo Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) pp. 429444. https://personal.utdallas.edu/~ryoung/phdseminar/CCR1978.pdf [accessed 22 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  8. F. Deyneli [2012]: Fatih Deyneli, Analysis of relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges with two-stage DEA method, European Journal for Law and Economics, 34 (2012), pp. 477493. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10657-011-9258-3#citeas [accessed 30 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-011-9258-3
  9. V. Dimitrova-GrajzlP. GrajzlK. ZajcJ. Sustersic [2012]: Valentina Dimitrova-Grajzl – Peter Grajzl – Katarina Zajc – Janez Sustersic, Judicial Incentives and Performance at Lower Courts: Evidence from Slovenian Judge-Level Data, Review of Law and Economics (2012) 8(1) pp. 215252. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228209234_Judicial_Incentives_and_Performance_at_Lower_Courts_Evidence_from_Slovenian_Judge-Level_Data [accessed 22 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1515/1555-5879.1610
  10. X. Dong [2021]: Xiaoge Dong, Efficiency of Courts in China – Does Location Matter?, ILE Working Paper Series, No. 50, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics (ILE), Hamburg. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233123/1/ile-wp-2021-50.pdf [accessed 25 Oktober 2021]
  11. G. FalavignaR. IppolitiA. ManelloG. B. Ramello [2015]: Greta Falavigna – Roberto Ippoliti – Alessandro Manello – Giovanni B. Ramello, Judicial productivity, delay and efficiency: A Directional Distance Function (DDF) approach, European Journal of Operational Research (2015) 240(2) pp. 592601. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265604315_Judicial_Productivity_Delay_and_Efficiency_A_Directional_Distance_Function_DDF_Approach [accessed 17 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.014
  12. M. Finocchiaro CastroC. Guccio [2016]: Massimo Finocchiaro Castro – Calogero Guccio, Measuring Potential Efficiency Gains from Mergers of Italian First Instance Courts Through Nonparametric Model, Public Finance Review, 46 (2016) (1) pp. 83116. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304033419_Measuring_Potential_Efficiency_Gains_from_Mergers_of_Italian_First_Instance_Courts_through_Nonparametric_Model [accessed 29 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1177/1091142116652723
  13. G. FerroV. OubiñaC. Romero [2020]: Gustavo Ferro – Victoria Oubiña – Carlos Romero, Benchmarking Labor Courts: An Efficiency Frontier Analysis, International Journal for Court Administration, 11 (2020) (2). https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/10.36745/ijca.313/ [accessed 29 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.313
  14. G. FerroC. A. RomeroE. Romero-Gómez [2018]: Gustavo Ferro – Carlos A. Romero – Exequiel Romero-Gómez, Efficient courts? A frontier performance assessment, Benchmarking: An International Journal, (2018) 25 (9), pp. 34433458. http://iiep-baires.econ.uba.ar/uploads/publicaciones/488/archivos/1.pdf [accessed 22 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2017-0244
  15. T. Gordon [1994]: Theodore Jay Gordon, The Delphi Method, AC/UNU Millennium Project, Futures Research Methodology 1994. http://www.gerenciamento.ufba.br/downloads/delphi_method.pdf [accessed 3 May 2020]
  16. H. Gramckow [2011]: Heike Gramckow, Estimating Staffing Needs in the Justice Sector, Washington, DC: World Bank, Justice & Development Working Paper Series, 2011. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/958421468324281209/pdf/729280NWP0Box30ector0J0D0WP01902012.pdf [accessed 7 August 2021]
  17. S. A. C. KittelsenF. R. Førsund [1992]: Sverre A. C. Kittelsen – Finn R. Førsund, Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts, Journal of Productivity Analysis 3 (1992), pp. 277306. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00158357 [accessed 30 Oktober 2021]. DOI: 10.1007/BF00158357
  18. M. KleimanC. G. LeeB. J. OstromR. Y. Schauffler [2017]: Matthew Kleiman – Cynthia G. Lee – Brian J. Ostrom – Richard Y. Schauffler, Case Weighting as a Common Yardstick: A Comparative Review of Current Uses and Future Directions, Oñati Socio-legal Series, 7 (4) (2017), pp. 640660. http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/824/1022 [accessed 5 August 2021]
  19. S. C. KumbhakarC. A. K. Lovell [2003]: Subal C. Kumbhakar – C. A. Knox Lovell, Stochastic frontier analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2003, http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam032/99031297.pdf [accessed 28 October 2021]
  20. A. Y. LewinR. C. MoreyT. J. Cook [1982]: Arie Y. Lewin – Richard C. Morey – Thomas J. Cook, Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts, Omega 10 (1982) (4), pp. 401411. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0305048382900196 [accessed 28 October 2021]. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(82)90019-6
  21. A. LienhardD. Kettiger [2011]: Andreas Lienhard – Daniel Kettiger, Research on the Caseload Management of Courts: Methodological Questions, Utrecht Law Review, 7 (1) (January 2011): pp. 6673. https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.147/ [accessed 31 July 2021]. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.147
  22. P. MattssonJ. MånssonC. AnderssonF. Bonander [2018]: Pontus Mattsson – Jonas Månsson – Christian Andersson – Fredrik Bonander, A bootstrapped Malmquist index applied to Swedish district courts, European Journal of Law and Economics, (2018) 46, pp. 109139. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10657-018-9582-y.pdf [accessed 29 October 2021]. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-018-9582-y
  23. H. McDonaldC. Kirsch [1978]: H. Graham McDonald – Clifford P. Kirsch, Use of the Delphi Method as a Means of Assessing Judicial Manpower Needs, The Justice System Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, 1978, pp. 314321., www.jstor.org/stable/23209474 [accessed 31 January 2021]
  24. G. A. OliveiraT. A. GuimaraesL. Akutsu [2017]: Gomes, Adalmir Oliveira – Tomas Aquino Guimaraes – Luiz Akutsu, Court Caseload Management: The Role of Judges and Administrative Assistants, Revista de Administração Contemporânea 21(5) (October 2017) pp. 648665. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rac/v21n5/1415-6555-rac-21-05-00648.pdf [accessed 30 January 2021]. DOI: 10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179
  25. L. Örkényi [2010]: Az ítélkezés időszerűtlenségének okai és a lehetséges megoldások a Fővárosi Bíróság polgári első fokú csoportjában, de Jure, May–June 2010, pp. 2744.
  26. L. Örkényi [2021]: Örkényi László, Duration of Court Events Required for Litigation – An Empirical Study to Provide a Theoretical Basis for an Objective Measurement System for Judicial Workload, International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1). [accessed 15 May 2021]. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.370
  27. A. PeyracheA. Zago [2012]: Antonio Peyrache – Angelo Zago, Large courts, small justice! The inefficiency and the optimal structure of the Italian Justice sector, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Working Paper Series WP06/2012. http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/cepa/docs/WP/WP062012.pdf [accessed 15 October 2021]
  28. J. M. Ramseyer [2012]: J. Mark Ramseyer, Talent matters: Judicial productivity and speed in Japan, International Review of Law and Economics Volume 32, Issue 1, March 2012, pp. 3848. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818811000846 [accessed 15 October 2021]. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.007
  29. C. R. Wilson VanVoorhisB. L. Morgan [2007]: Carmen R. Wilson VanVoorhis – Betsy L. Morgan, Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2007, vol. 3 (2), pp. 4350. https://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol03-2/p043/p043.pdf [accessed 1 November 2021]. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
  30. L. YeungP. F. de Azevedo [2011]: Luciana Yeung – Paulo Furquim de Azevedo, Measuring Efficiency of Brazilian Courts with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 22 (2011) (4), pp. 343356. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270971641_Measuring_Efficiency_of_Brazilian_Courts_with_Data_Envelopment_Analysis_DEA [accessed 1 November 2021]. DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpr002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.407 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 2
Published on: Apr 22, 2022
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 László Örkényi, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.