Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fiabilismo Robusto De Virtudes Colectivas Cover
By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Bengson, J., & Moffett, M. A. (2011). Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press USA. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389364.001.0001
  2. Bird, A. (2010). Social Knowing: The Social Sense of ‘Scientific Knowledge’. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00184.x
  3. Broncano-Berrocal, F. (2025). Pluralistic Summativism About Group Belief. En J. Lackey y A. McGlynn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.6
  4. Carter, J. A. (2022). Collective (Telic) Virtue Epistemology. En M. Alfano, C. Klein, y J. D. Ridder (Eds), Social Virtue Epistemology (pp. 335–356). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808952-45
  5. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  6. Đorđević, S., y Berber, A. (2025). The Criteria for the Emergence of Collective Epistemic Traits. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu, 32(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2025.32305
  7. Dragos, C. (2019). Groups Can Know How. American Philosophical Quarterly, 56(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/48570635
  8. Faria, D. (2021). Group Belief: Defending a Minimal Version of Summativism. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158111
  9. Gettier, E. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
  10. Gilbert, M. (1987/1992). On Social Facts. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214627
  11. Gilbert, M. (2002). Acting Together. En G. Meggle (Ed.), Social Facts & Collective Intentionality. Dr. Hänsel-Hohenhausen.
  12. Gilbert, M. (2004). Collective Epistemology. Episteme, 1(2), 95-107. http://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.95
  13. Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.001.0001
  14. Gilbert, M. (2023). Life in Groups: How We Think, Feel, and Act Together. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847157.001.0001
  15. Goldberg, S. (2009). The Social Virtues: Two Accounts. Acta Analytica, 24(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0059-z
  16. Goldberg, S. (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593248.001.0001
  17. Goldman, A. (1987). Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese, 73(1), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485444
  18. Goldman, A. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001
  19. Goldman, A. (2010). Why Social Epistemology is Real Epistemology. In A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Social Epistemology (pp. 1–29). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577477.003.0001
  20. Goldman, A., y Whitcomb, D. (2010). Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press.
  21. Graf, S., & Dang, H. (2025). Divergence Arguments in Collective Epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 20(6), e70045. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70045
  22. Greco, J. (2021). The Transmission of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560818
  23. Harris, K. R. (2025). Social virtue epistemology and epistemic exactingness. Episteme, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.41
  24. Jarczewski, D. (2024). Generous Virtues: Rethinking the Value of Intellectual Virtues in Social Terms. Ad Americam, 25, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.12797/AdAmericam.25.2024.25.03
  25. Jarczewski, D., y Riggs, W. D. (2025). Socializing Virtue Epistemology. Episteme, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.10
  26. Kallestrup, J. (2020). Group virtue epistemology. Synthese, 197(12), 5233–5251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1225-7
  27. Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251223.001.0001
  28. Lackey, J. (2021). The Epistemology of Groups. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199656608.001.0001
  29. Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective Epistemic Virtues. Social Epistemology, 21(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701674122
  30. List, C., y Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001
  31. Longino, H. E. (2006). Philosophy of Science after the Social Turn. En M. C. Galavotti (Ed.), Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle (pp. 167–177). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4101-2_11
  32. Navarro, J., y Pino, D. (2021). Deslimitando a Sosa: Diacronía y Colectividad del Juicio Doxástico. En M. Gómez-Alonso & D. Pérez-Chico, (Eds.), Ernesto Sosa: Conocimiento y Virtud (pp. 211-244). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
  33. Navarro, J., y Pino, D. (2024). The boundaries of gnoseology. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02205-8
  34. Palermos, S. O. (2016). The Dynamics of Group Cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-016-9402-5
  35. Palermos, S. O. (2022). Collaborative Knowledge: Where the Distributed and Commitment Models Merge. Synthese, 200(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03459-7
  36. Palermos, S. O., y Pritchard, D. (2016). The Distribution of Epistemic Agency. En P. J. Reider (Ed.), Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency: De-Centralizing Epistemic Agency (pp. 109–126). Rowan & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798881813000.ch-007
  37. Palermos, S. O., y Tollefsen, D. P. (2018). Group Know-How. En J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially Extended Epistemology (pp. 112-131). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801764.003.0007
  38. Pino, D. (2021). Group (epistemic) competence. Synthese, 199, 11377-11396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03294-2
  39. Pino, D. (2025). Competencia, Seguridad y Situación en el Fiabilismo de Virtudes. Teorema. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 44(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30827/trif.32916
  40. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson & Co.
  41. Quinton, A. (1976). “Social Objects”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, 1–27.
  42. Schmitt, F. (1994). The justification of group beliefs. En F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge (pp. 257-287). Rowan & Littlefield.
  43. Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001
  45. Sosa, E. (2009). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217250.001.0001
  46. Sosa, E. (2010). How Competence Matters in Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00200.x
  47. Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836918
  48. Sosa, E. (2014). Con pleno conocimiento (M. Gómez-Alonso, Trad). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
  49. Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment & Agency. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719694.001.0001
  50. Sosa, E. (2017). Epistemology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883059
  51. Sosa, E. (2018). Una epistemología de virtudes. Creencia apta y conocimiento reflexivo (vol. 1) (J. J. Colomina Almiñana, Trad.). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
  52. Sosa, E. (2021). Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity, and What it Explains. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198856467.001.0001
  53. Sosa, E. (2023). Juicio y Agencia (M. Gómez-Alonso, Trad.). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
  54. Stanley, J. (2011). Knowing (How). Noûs, 45(2), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00758.x
  55. Stanley, J., y Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403
  56. Tollefsen, D. (2002). Challenging Epistemic Individualism. ProtoSociology, 16, 86–117. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology20021622
  57. Tollefsen, D. P. (2003). Rejecting Rejectionism. ProtoSociology, 18, 389-405. https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology200318/1916
  58. Tollefsen, D. (2004). Collective Epistemic Agency. Southwest Philosophy Review, 20(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20042015
  59. Tollefsen, D. P. (2006). From extended mind to collective mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2-3), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.01.001
  60. Tollefsen, D. (2011). Groups as Rational Sources. En H. B. Schmid, D. Sirtes, y M. Weber (Eds.), Collective Epistemology (pp. 20–11). Ontos-Velag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322583.11
  61. Tollefsen, D. (2015). Groups as Agents. Polity.
  62. Tuomela, R. (1992). Group beliefs. Synthese, 91(3), 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413570
  63. Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001
  64. Tuomela, R., y Miller, K. (1985). We-Intentions and Social Action. Analyse & Kritik, 7(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1985-0102
  65. Winsberg, E. (2018). Philosophy and Climate Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108164290
  66. Wray, K. B. (2001). Collective Belief and Acceptance. Synthese, 129(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013148515033
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-955X.53.169 | Journal eISSN: 2660-9509 | Journal ISSN: 0210-4857
Language: Spanish
Page range: 169 - 202
Submitted on: Feb 19, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2026
Published on: Apr 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Dani Pino, published by Pontifical University of Salamanca
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.