Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Value of Understandable Consumer Insurance Contracts Cover

The Value of Understandable Consumer Insurance Contracts

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Abraham, K. S. (1981). Judge-made law and judge-made insurance: Honoring the reasonable expectations of the insured. Virginia Law Review, 67(6), 1151-1199.
  2. Abraham, K. S. (1996). A theory of insurance policy interpretation. Michigan Law Review, 95(3), 531-569.
  3. Abraham, K. S., & Schwarcz, D. (2022). The limits of regulation by insurance. Indiana Law Journal, 98(1), Article 5. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu//cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11481&context=ilj
  4. Adler, M. (2012). The plain language movement. In P. M. Trersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 67-83). Oxford University Press.
  5. American Law Institute. (2019). Restatement of the law of liability insurance (RLLI). American Law Institute Publishers.
  6. Ayres, I., & Schwartz, A. (2014). The no-reading problem in consumer contract law. Stanford Law Review, 66(3), 546-548.
  7. Baker, T. (1996). On the genealogy of moral hazard. Texas Law Review, 75(2), 237-292.
  8. Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., & Trossen, D. R. (2014). Does anyone read the fine print? Consumer attention to standard-form contracts. Journal of Legal Studies, 43(1), 1-35.
  9. Bar-Gill, O. (2015). Defending (smart) disclosure: A comment on more than you wanted to know. Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, 11, 75-82. http://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlu017
  10. Ben-Shahar, O., & Logue, K. (2016). The perverse effects of subsidized weather insurance. Stanford Law Review, 68(3), 571-626.
  11. Ben-Shahar, O., & Schneider, C. (2014). More than you wanted to know: The failure of mandated disclosure. Princeton Press.
  12. Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2011). Information disclosure, cognitive biases, and payday borrowing. The Journal of Finance, 66(6), 1865-1893. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41305179
  13. Blasie, M. A. (2022). The rise of plain language laws. University of Miami Law Review, 76(2), Article 4, 447-524.
  14. Boardman, M. (2009). Insuring understanding: The tested language defense. Iowa Law Review, 95(4), 1075-1124.
  15. Boardman, M. E. (2006). Contra proferentem: The allure of ambiguous boilerplate. Michigan Law Review, 104(5), 1105-1128.
  16. Boardman, M. E. (2013). Penalty default rules in insurance laws. Florida State University Law Review, 40(2), 305-348.
  17. Burton v. Ky. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 326 S.W.3d 474, 476 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010).
  18. California Earthquake Authority, Cal. Ins. Code § 10089.28 (2018). https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2018/code-ins/division-2/part-1/chapter-8.6/section-10089.28/
  19. Cogan, J. R., Jr. (2010). Readability, contracts of recurring use, and the problem of ex post judicial governance of health insurance policies. Roger Williams University Law Review, 15(1), Article 4. https://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1420&context=rwu_LR
  20. Consumers Union. (2012). What’s behind the door? Consumers’ difficulties in selecting health plans. https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/research/whats-behind-the-door-consumer-difficulties-selecting-health-plans/
  21. Cope, C. (2022). Regulation of policy forms. In J. E. Thomas (Ed.), New Appleman on insurance law library edition). Lexis-Nexis.
  22. Cude, B. J. (2006). Insurance disclosures: An effective mechanism to increase consumers’ insurance market power? Journal of Insurance Regulation, 24(2), 57-80. https://naic.soutronglobal.net/Portal/Public/en-GB/RecordView/Index/3888
  23. Customer Information Brochure for Homeowners Insurance Consumers, N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.36. (2013). https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-17/section-17-36-5.36
  24. Day, R., & Nadash, P. (2012). New state insurance exchanges should follow the example of Massachusetts by simplifying choices among health plans. Health Affairs, 31(5), 982-989. http://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0691
  25. de Meza, P. E., Irlenbusch, B., & Reymers, D. J. (2010). Disclosure, trust and persuasion in insurance markets. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4060. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/5060/disclosure-trust-and-persuasion-in-insurance-markets
  26. Disclosure of Credit Reports, Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 10-4-616 (2022). https://casetext.com/statute/colorado-revised-statutes/title-10-insurance/property-and-casualty-insurance/article-4-property-and-casualty-insurance/part-6-automobile-insurance-policy-regulations/section-10-4-616-disclosure-of-credit-reports
  27. Flood Insurance Notice, N.Y. INS. LAW § 3444 (2007). https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/insurance-law/isc-sect-3444.html
  28. Formisano, R. A. (1981). The NAIC Model Life Insurance Solicitation Regulation: Measuring the impact in New Jersey. Risk and Insurance, 48, 59-79. http://www.bonknote.com/wp-content/uploads/1981-AP-Formisano-FTC-Life-Insurance-Disclosure-22p.pdf
  29. French, C. C. (2017). Insurance policies: The grandparents of contractual black holes. Duke Law Journal Online, 67. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=dlj_online
  30. Garrison, L., Hastok, M., Hogarth, J. M., Kleimann, S., & Levy, A. S. (2012). Designing evidence-based disclosures: A case study of financial privacy notices. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(2), 204-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2012.01226.x
  31. General rules Governing Insurance, Cal. Ins. Code § 489 (2011). https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2011/ins/division-1/480-491/489/
  32. Hillman, R. A., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2002). Standard-form contracting in the electronic age. New York University Law Review, 77(1), 429-495.
  33. Interstate Insurance Product Regulatory Commission. (n.d.). The Interstate Compact. https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/government-affairs-brief-about-insurance-compact.pdf
  34. Kaplow, L. (1992). Rules versus standards: An economic analysis. Duke Law Review, 42(1), 557-629. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol42/iss3/2/
  35. Kim, J., Braun, B., & Williams, A. D. (2013). Understanding health insurance literacy: A literature review. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12034
  36. Kingsdale, J. (2010). Health insurance exchanges: Key link in a better-value chain. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(23), 2147-2150. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1004758
  37. Kirsch, L. (2002). Do product disclosures inform and safeguard insurance policyholders? Journal of Insurance Regulation, 20(3), 271-295. https://naic.soutronglobal.net/Portal/Public/en-GB/RecordView/Index/1959
  38. Lacko, J., & Pappalardo, J. (2010). The promise of mandated consumer mortgage disclosures: Evidence from qualitative interviews and a controlled experiment with mortgage borrowers. American Economic Review, 100(21), 56-521. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.516
  39. Llewelyn, K. N. (1960). The common law tradition - Deciding appeals. Little Brown.
  40. Loewenstein, G., Friedman, J. Y., McGill, G., Ahmad, S., Linck, S., Sinkula, S., Beshears, J. L., Choi, J. J., Kolstad, J., Laibson, D. I., Madrian, B., List, J. A., & Volpp, K. G. (2013). Consumers’ mis- understanding of health insurance. Journal of Health Economics, 32(5), 850-862.
  41. McElvaney, T. J., Lunn, P. D., & McGowan, F. P. (2018). Do consumers understand PCP car finance? An experimental investigation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 41, 229-255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.004
  42. Metz, J. (2022, May 3). 72% of homeowners don’t understand essential home insurance coverage. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/homeowners-insurance/survey-homeowners-insurance-knowlege/National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (2010). A consumer’s guide to home insurance
  43. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (2010). A consumer’s guide to home insurance. https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/publication-hoi-pp-consumer-homeowners.pdf
  44. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (2017). Privacy of consumer financial and health information regulation. https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/model-law-672.pdf
  45. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (2018). Life and health insurance guaranty association model act. https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/MDL-520.pdf
  46. Nationwide. (2013, September 26). Consumers confused, overwhelmed by their insurance policies, according to survey. https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/13/09/b3944738/consumers-confused-overwhelmed-by-their-insurance-policies-according-to
  47. Notice Regarding Earthquake Exclusion, Va. Code Ann. § 38.2-2129 (2012). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title38.2/chapter21/section38.2-2129/
  48. Notice Regarding Flood Damage Coverage, N.J. ADMIN. CODE § 11:1-5.5 (2013). https://www.state.nj.us/dobi/division_consumers/insurance/floodreq.htm
  49. Personal Automobile Insurance, Rental Vehicle Coverage, ME. REV. STAT. TIT. 24-A, § 2927 (2019). http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/24-a/title24-Asec2927.html
  50. Private Passenger Automobile Liability Policy; Disclosure; Requirements, Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 44-7516.01 (2001). https://casetext.com/statute/revised-statutes-of-nebraska/chapter-44-insurance/article-75-property-and-casualty-insurance-rate-and-form-act/section-44-751601-private-passenger-automobile-liability-policy-disclosure-requirements
  51. Radin, M. (2012). Boilerplate: The fine print, vanishing rights, and the rule of law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  52. Rakoff, T. D. (1983). Contracts of adhesion: An essay in reconstruction. Harvard Law Review, 96(6), 1173-1284.
  53. Readability of Insurance Policies Act, Minn. Stat. § 72C.02 (2022). https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/72C.02
  54. Required Disclosures for Residential Homeowner Policies, 702 DEL. CODE REGS. § 5 (2013). https://regulations.delaware.gov/AdminCode/title18/700/702.shtml
  55. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41760530
  56. Schwarcz, D. (2007). A products liability theory for the judicial regulation of insurance policies. William & Mary Law Review, 48(3), 1389-1463. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol48/iss4/5/
  57. Schwarcz, D. (2012). Reevaluating standardized insurance policies. University of Chicago Law Review, 78(4), 1263-1348. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol78/iss4/3/
  58. Schwarcz, D. (2014). Transparently opaque: Understanding the lack of transparency in insurance consumer protection. UCLA Law Review, 61, 394-462. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1582&context=faculty_articles
  59. Schwarcz, D. (2017). Coverage information in insurance law. Minnesota Law Review, 101, 1457-1527. https://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Schwarcz.pdf
  60. Schwarcz, D. (2020). The role of courts in the evolution of standard form contracts: An insurance case study. Brigham Young University Law Review, 46, 471-572. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3285&context=lawreview
  61. Schwartz, A., & Wilde. L. (1983). Imperfect information in markets for contract terms: The examples of warranties and security interests. Virginia Law Review, 69(8), 1387-1485. http://doi.org/10.2307/1072774
  62. Schwarzbach, C., & Weston, H. (2016). Limitations of German insurance disclosures to improve consumer understanding, with lessons for U.S. insurance practices. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 35(8), 1-28. https://naic.soutronglobal.net/Portal/Public/en-GB/RecordView/Index/23497
  63. Solan, L., Rosenblatt, T., & Osherson, D. (2008). False consensus bias in contract interpretation. Columbia Law Review, 108(5), 1268-1300. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1275&context=faculty
  64. Sommers, R. (2021). Contract schemas. Annual Revenue of Law and Social Science, 17, 293-308. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-040721-103558
  65. Summary Disclosure Forms Required, COLO. REV. STAT. § 10-4-111 (2019). https://codes.findlaw.com/co/title-10-insurance/co-rev-st-sect-10-4-111/
  66. Summary Plan Description, ERISA § 1022(a), (1974). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/1022
  67. Sunstein, C. (2010). Disclosure and simplification as regulatory tools. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/for-agencies/informing-consumers-through-smart-disclosure.pdf
  68. Thomas, J. E. (1998). An interdisciplinary critique of the reasonable expectations doctrine. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 5(1), 295-334. https://irlaw.umkc.edu/faculty_works/589
  69. Tucker, R. L. (2009). Disappearing ink: The emerging duty to remove invalid policy provisions. Akron Law Review, 42(2), Article 6, 519-477. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol42/iss2/6/
  70. van Boom, W. H., Desmet, P., & van Dam, M. (2016). “If it’s easy to read, it’s easy to claim” - The effect of the readability of insurance contracts on consumer expectations and conflict behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 39, 187-197. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-016-9317-9
  71. Waldon, B., Brodsky, M., Ma, M., & Degena, J. (2023). Predicting consensus in legal document inter- pretation (Stanford University Working Paper). Willis, L. (2008). Against financial literacy education. Iowa Law Review, 94(1), 197-286. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285717001_Against_Financial-Literacy_Education
  72. Zacarias v. Allstate Insurance Company, 775 A.2d 1262 (NJ, 2021).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36544/irfc.2023.8-1.1 | Journal eISSN: 2508-464X | Journal ISSN: 2508-3155
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 15
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2022
Accepted on: May 23, 2023
Published on: Jun 30, 2023
Published by: International Academy of Financial Consumers
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Kyle Logue, Daniel Schwarcz, Brenda J. Cude, published by International Academy of Financial Consumers
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.