Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Atmospheric ice nuclei at the high-altitude observatory Jungfraujoch, Switzerland Cover

Atmospheric ice nuclei at the high-altitude observatory Jungfraujoch, Switzerland

Open Access
|Jan 2015

Figures & Tables

Fig 1.

Geographical location of the three sampling stations (a). View from Izaña observatory during dust-free (b) and under Saharan dust conditions (c). Jungfraujoch station (d) and a view from Chaumont station across the Swiss Plateau towards Jungfraujoch on the crest of the snow covered mountain ridge on the horizon (e).

Fig 2.

Time course of IN−8 at Jungfraujoch (filled symbols indicate Sahara dust events) and maximum daily temperature (columns). When no freezing event was detected in 108 filter cut-outs (IN−8 below detection limit), values were set to 0.01 m−3.

Fig 3.

Time course of IN−8 at Izaña (full symbols indicate Sahara dust events). Values of IN−8 below detection limit are set to 0.01 m−3.

Fig 4.

Separation of data from Jungfraujoch into three groups (top left): large PM10 values (blue), small PM10 values but with large numbers of IN−10 (green), and the remainder (red). Source sensitivity fields, integrated from the model surface to 100 m above model ground τ0–100, for days with large PM10 values (top right), and for days with small PM10 values but large numbers of IN−10 (bottom).

Fig 5.

IN−8 as a function of N>0.5 at Jungfraujoch (n =66). Full symbols indicate Sahara dust events. Values of IN−8 below detection limit are set to 0.01 m−3 to keep them in the plot and avoid a perception biased towards larger values. The regression line is fitted to all data (when data below detection limit is omitted from calculating the regression line, then R2=0.14).

Fig 6.

Time course of IN−8 at Chaumont (symbols) and maximum daily temperature (columns). Full symbols indicate cold days (Tmax<0°C). Values of IN−8 below detection limit are set to 0.01 m−3.

Fig 7.

IN as a function of Tmax at Jungfraujoch. The regression line is fitted to all data. Limiting the analysis to days for which N>0.5 data are available (n=66 instead of 83), R2 is reduced to 0.48. Values below detection limit were set to 0.01 m−3 to keep them in the plot and avoid a perception biased towards larger values. Omitting values below detection limit results in R2=0.55.

Fig 8.

Median concentrations of IN active at −12°C or warmer at different heights above sea level. Data for Puy de Dôme are from Joly et al. (2014). Lines indicate temperature dependent parameterisations by Fletcher (1962; dashed line) and by Meyers et al. (1992; continuous line).

Language: English
Page range: 25014 - 25014
Submitted on: May 23, 2014
Accepted on: Jan 5, 2015
Published on: Jan 1, 2015
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 Franz Conen, Sergio Rodríguez, Christoph Hü Glin, Stephan Henne, Erik Herrmann, Nicolas Bukowiecki, Christine Alewell, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.