Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Characteristics of summer-time energy exchange in a high Arctic tundra heath 2000–2010 Cover

Characteristics of summer-time energy exchange in a high Arctic tundra heath 2000–2010

Open Access
|Jan 2014

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Map of the study area indicating the location of eddy covariance (EC) mast (Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 27, World Geodetic System (WGS) 84). White contour lines indicate 100 m elevation intervals. Inserted map shows the location of Zackenberg in Northeast Greenland (74.47°N, 20.55°W). The average footprint of the EC system was ca. 200 m long, directed towards southeast, and dominated by Cassiope heath plant community type (Lund et al., 2012).

Fig. 2

Mean July air temperature (T a ) 1996–2010 (a) and maximum active layer depth (Max. ALD) 1997–2010 (b) in Zackenberg, NE Greenland.

Table 1. Mid-summer period surface energy balance and environmental characteristics during the study period 2000–2010

Year20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010MeanSt. dev.ChangeaMid-summerStart1671751711661671611791611741541661677−0.7End2372502472532502462362412542402362457−0.6Length71767788848658818187717890.1DiurnalT a 4.85.14.96.05.85.16.35.77.14.95.45.60.70.08T08.17.47.78.38.39.29.78.97.27.47.98.20.80.01T2.56.15.96.26.77.06.97.06.96.36.16.36.50.40.02SW in 215206184191195198215225184210233205161.8θ v 0.360.360.340.370.360.360.330.300.300.290.270.330.04−0.010**Precip13.726.826.19.921.333.113.921.960.059.413.327.217.52.2Max. ALD63.463.370.572.576.379.476.074.879.479.478.273.96.01.54**Max. SD0.480.681.330.600.690.731.090.571.300.160.730.760.35−0.005MiddaybH151139130125135140142159126129151139110.2LE52424448475258545046565050.7G83846658614158492927245321−5.9**R n 318307250235242n/a26827722523126626232−4.8H/R n 0.490.450.490.560.55n/a0.520.570.520.560.580.530.040.009*LE/R n 0.160.160.190.230.22n/a0.220.200.210.230.230.200.030.006*G/R n 0.270.290.290.280.25n/a0.230.200.140.130.100.220.07−0.019**B3.73.63.02.83.22.92.63.12.72.92.83.00.4−0.071*r a 901018985848796899594949150.3r s 41444927634335030631330937332330934252−7.6Ω0.370.340.410.370.350.390.400.410.370.440.410.390.030.005*A0.500.500.620.550.510.520.570.570.560.580.560.550.040.005D a 334317227351373331394370391283333337493.7D s 8647716947538268038261012643569637763124−14.3

[i] Mid-summer period is defined as the period with daily average T a and T 0 above 0°C, positive SW in and R n , and albedo between 10 and 20%.

[ii] *Linear change (F statistic in linear regression) is significant at the α=0.05 level; **α=0.001 level.

[iii] aSlope of linear regression with years as independent variable.

[iv] bMean midday (11:00 – 15:00 local time) values during mid-summer period.

Fig. 3

Environmental characteristics and surface energy dynamics during average year mid-summer period. (a) net radiation (R n ); (b) air temperature (T a ); (c) ratio of sensible heat (H) to R n ; (d) soil volumetric water content (θ v ); (e) ratio of latent heat (LE) to R n ; (f) surface resistance (r s ); (g) ratio of ground heat flux (G) to R n ; (h) Priestley-Taylor α coefficient; (i) Bowen ratio (β); and (j) McNaughton & Jarvis Ω value. Black dots represent means and error bars standard error. Mid-summer period is defined as the period with daily average T a and T 0 above 0°C, positive SW in and R n , and albedo between 10 and 20%. Mean start and end dates during the study period (2000–2010) were 16 June and 1 September, respectively.

Fig. 4

Relationship between within-year variations in Bowen ratio (β) and environmental characteristics during 2003. (a) net radiation (R n ); (b) atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (D a ); and (c) surface saturation vapour pressure deficit (D s ). Observations of β was averaged within bins of 50 W m−2 (R n ) and 100 Pa (D a , D s ), respectively. Black dots represent means and error bars standard deviation.

Fig. 5

Relationship between surface saturation vapour pressure deficit (D s ) and environmental characteristics during 2007. (a) McNaughton & Jarvis Ω value; (b) Priestley-Taylor α coefficient; and (c) surface resistance (r s ). Observations of Ω, α and r s was averaged within D s bins of 100 Pa. Black dots represent means and error bars standard deviation.

Table 2. Average midday, mid-summer meteorological conditions and surface energy partitioning characteristics during 2002 (means±standard deviation)

Offshore windsOnshore windsp a T a 7.6±2.36.5±3.20.003D a 311±204204±190<0.001H/R n 0.33±0.320.54±0.15<0.001LE/R n 0.30±0.120.17±0.08<0.001G/R n 0.35±0.110.27±0.08<0.001β0.72±1.293.51±1.42<0.001α1.20±0.580.49±0.19<0.001r a 71±2990±31<0.001r s 161±114301±158<0.001

[i] Offshore and onshore winds are defined as coming from 225–45° and 45–225° (relative to north), respectively. Mid-summer period is defined as the period with daily average T a and T 0 above 0°C, positive SW in and R n , and albedo between 10 and 20%.

[ii] a p values depict the probability that means are equal (two-sample t-test).

Fig. 6

Changes in mid-summer surface energy balance partitioning between 2000 and 2010. Lines indicate significant change in data. Error bars for G/R n 2008–2010 indicates uncertainty (St. dev.) in extrapolating ɛ [eq. (4)]. 1-(H/R n +LE/R n ) is a residual term in the energy balance serving as an independent proxy for G. Mid-summer period is defined as the period with daily average T a and T 0 above 0°C, positive SW in and R n , and albedo between 10 and 20%.

NameUnitExplanationT a °CAir temperatureT0°CSurface temperatureT2.5°CSoil temperature at 2.5 cm depthD a PaAtmospheric vapour pressure deficitD s PaSurface saturation vapour pressure deficit [eq. (9)]R n W m−2Net radiationSW in W m−2Incoming short-wave radiationPrecipmmPrecipitationθ v m3 m−3Volumetric soil water contentALDcmActive layer depthSDmSnow depthHW m−2Sensible heat fluxLEW m−2Latent heat fluxβ–Bowen ratio (H/LE)GmeasW m−2Measured soil heat fluxGmeas,surW m−2Measured soil heat flux plus storage term [eq. (1)]GW m−2Modelled soil heat flux [eq. (4)]r s s m−1Bulk surface resistance [eq. (5)]r a s m−1Aerodynamic resistance [eq. (6)]Ω–McNaughton & Jarvis Ω value [eq. (7)]A–Priestley-Taylor coefficient α [eq. (8)]
Language: English
Page range: 21631 - 21631
Submitted on: Jun 6, 2013
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2014
Published on: Jan 1, 2014
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 Magnus Lund, Birger U. Hansen, Stine H. Pedersen, Christian Stiegler, Mikkel P. Tamstorf, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.