Abstract
Numerical results of the “αω-” and the “ν∙∇∅-formulation” of the atmospheric energy conversion integral, as derived from ECMWF-data, are presented and discussed. It is shown that even global integrals of either formulation are considerably different. If the integration area is restricted to hemispheres, the differences — though growing somewhat larger — are of similar magnitude. The results suggest that numerical evaluations of the baroclinic energy conversion process are still associated with a considerable degree of uncertainty.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v39i5.11778 | Journal eISSN: 3035-9554
Language: English
Page range: 515 - 520
Submitted on: Mar 20, 1986
Accepted on: Feb 9, 1987
Published on: Jan 1, 1987
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 1987 M. Ponater, G. Frenzen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
