Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Benefits of Community-University Partnerships in Rural Settings: Lessons Learned from an Inclusive Science Day Event Cover

Benefits of Community-University Partnerships in Rural Settings: Lessons Learned from an Inclusive Science Day Event

By:  and    
Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. (1991). Pub. L. No. 101–336 § 2, 104 Stat. 328.
  2. Anderson, G. (2004). Reinventing the museum: Historical and contemporary perspectives on the paradigm shift. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  3. Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20, 125. Retrieved from: http://jrre.vmhost.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/20-6.pdf.
  4. Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52, 2835. DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
  5. Avery, L. M., & Kassam, K.-A. (2011). Phronesis: Children’s local rural knowledge of science and engineering. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26, 118.
  6. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B. V., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  7. Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., Root, D., Rudder Kilkenny, L., Xanthoudaki, M., & Yoon, S. (2010). Making science matter: Collaborations between informal science education organizations and schools. Washington, DC: Center for the Advancement of Informal School Science Education (CAISE). Retrieved from: http://www.informalscience.org/documents/MakingScienceMatter.pdf.
  8. Dani, D., Hartman, S. L., & Helfrich, S. (2017). Learning to teach science: Elementary teacher candidates facilitate informal STEM events. The New Educator, 14(4), 363380. DOI: 10.1080/1547688X.2017.1356413
  9. Dawson, E. (2014). Equity in informal science education: Developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 209247. DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2014.957558
  10. DeYoung, A. J. (1987). The status of American rural education research: An integrated review and commentary. Review of Educational Research, 57, 123148. DOI: 10.3102/00346543057002123
  11. Duran, E., Ballone-Duran, L., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2009). The impact of aprofessional development program integrating informal science education on early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 5370. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ867290.pdf. DOI: 10.1007/BF03182357
  12. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  13. Garcia, B. (2015). What we do best: Making the case for museum learning in its own right. Journal of Museum Education, 37, 4755. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com.proxy.library.ohiou.edu/doi/abs/10.1080/10598650.2012.11510730?src=recsys. DOI: 10.1080/10598650.2012.11510730
  14. Hartman, S., & Hines-Bergmeier, J. (2015). Building connections: Strategies to address rurality and accessibility challenges. Journal of Museum Education, 40, 288303. DOI: 10.1179/1059865015Z.000000000105
  15. Hartman, S. L., Hines-Bergmeier, J., & Klein, R. (2017). Informal STEM learning: The state of research, access, and equity in rural early childhood settings. Journal of Science Education and Civic Engagement, 9, 3239. Retrieved from: http://new.seceij.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Hartman.pdf.
  16. Holmes, K., & Edwards, D. (2008). Volunteers as hosts and guests in museums. In: Lyons, K. D., & Wearing, S. (eds.), Journeys of Discovery in Volunteer Tourism, 155165. Wallingford: CABI.
  17. Individuals with Disabilities Education. (2004). Act, 20 U.S.C. 167; 1400.
  18. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). (2014). Museum Universe Data File [data file]. Retrieved from: https://data.imls.gov/Museum-Universe-Data-File/Museum-Universe-Data-File-FY-2015-Q3/ku5e-zr2b?_ga=2.3471536.1472656112.1542646772-348081419.1540914395.
  19. Irving, M., Nti, M., & Johnson, W. (2007). Meeting the needs of the special learner in science. International Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 109118. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9505-0_14
  20. Kahn, S., & Lewis, A. R. (2014). Survey on teaching science to K-12 students with disabilities: Teacher preparedness and attitudes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 885910. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-014-9406-z
  21. McGinnis, J. R., Hestness, E., Riedinger, K., Katz, P., Marbach-Ad, G., & Dai, A. (2012). Informal science education in formal science teacher preparation. In: Tobin, K., Frasier, B., & McRobbie, C. (eds.), Second international handbook of science education, 10971108. The Netherlands: Kluwer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_72
  22. McGinnis, J. R., & Kahn, S. (2014). Special needs and talents in science learning. In: Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (eds.), Handbook of research in science education, II, 223245. New York, NY: Routledge.
  23. Nagle, K. M., Hernandez, G., Embler, S., McLaughlin, M. J., & Doh, F. (2006). Characteristics of effective rural elementary schools for students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(3), 312. DOI: 10.1177/875687050602500302
  24. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2015. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/science/.
  25. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  26. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF13-304. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
  27. Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  28. Ng-He, C. (2015). Common goals, common core: Museums and schools work together. Journal of Museum Education, 40, 220226. DOI: 10.1179/1059865015Z.00000000098
  29. Parsons, J., Hartman, S. L., Hines-Bergmeier, J., & Truly, C. (2017). A museum without walls: Facilitating STEAM partnerships in rural settings. Connected Science Learning, 3, 121. Retrieved from: http://csl.nsta.org/2017/07/museum-without-walls/.
  30. Patterson, J. S., Watts, D. T., Rathbone, B., & Edwards, S. J. (2016). Broadband Planning Primer and Toolkit. Report prepared by the Appalachian Regional Commission. Retrieved from: http://www.arc.gov/images/programs/telecom/ARCBroadbandPlanningPrimerToolkit.pdf.
  31. Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  32. Showalter, D., Klein, R., Johnson, J., & Hartman, S. L. (2017). Why rural matters 2015–16: Understanding the changing landscape. Washington, DC: The Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from: http://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/WRM-2015-16.pdf.
  33. Tlili, A. (2008). Behind the policy mantra of the inclusive museum: Receptions of social exclusion and inclusion in museums and science centres. Cultural Sociology, 2(1), 123147. DOI: 10.1177/1749975507086277
  34. United States Census Bureau. (2014). State and county quick facts. Retrieved from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/39/39127.html.
  35. Waters, M., Howley, C., & Schultz, J. (2008). An initial research agenda for rural mathematics education. Journal of Appalachian Studies, 14, 125144. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498099.pdf.
  36. White, B. P. (2010). Power, privilege, and the public: The dynamics of community university collaboration. New Directions for Higher Education, 152, 6774. DOI: 10.1002/he.414
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33596/coll.20 | Journal eISSN: 2638-4396
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Jan 22, 2019
Published by: University of Miami Libraries
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Sara L. Hartman, Sami Kahn, published by University of Miami Libraries
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.