Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Holding Back: The Impact of Motivation to Control Prejudice on Stereotypes About Immigrants Cover

Holding Back: The Impact of Motivation to Control Prejudice on Stereotypes About Immigrants

Open Access
|Jan 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive statistics. Mean and [standard deviation] for each treatment group.

GR. 1 (SWEDES)GR. 2 (SOMALIS)GR. 3 (PAKISTANIS)GR. 4 (SYRIANS)GR. 5 (POLES)(MIN-MAX)
Warmth2.72 [0.66]1.61 [0.74]2.07 [0.73]2.04 [0.78]2.06 [0.69](0–4)
Competence2.96 [0.57]1.89 [0.61]2.47 [0.58]2.17 [0.65]2.50 [0.56](0–4)
Status2.19 [0.57]1.18 [0.55]1.99 [0.56]1.65 [0.64]1.68 [0.53](0–4)
Competition0.89 [0.71]1.60 [0.92]1.38 [0.84]1.47 [0.89]1.26 [0.76](0–4)
MCP2.67 [0.73]2.68 [0.74]2.70 [0.70]2.72 [0.74]2.66 [0.73](1–4)
Gender (women = 1)0.48 [0.50]0.45 [0.50]0.52 [0.50]0.49 [0.50]0.50 [0.50](1–2)
Age51.94 [16.82]52.36 [16.37]51.68 [16.52]51.61 [16.59]52.81 [16.99](15–87)
Higher education0.33 [0.47]0.32 [0.47]0.35 [0.48]0.34 [0.47]0.34 [0.47](0–1)
n596557519575552
Figure 1

Placement of national groups based on competence (average of two variables) and warmth (average of two variables). N = 519–596 per group, randomly distributed.

Table 2

The relationship between stereotypes and MCP; OLS regression (n = 2799).

WARMTHCOMPETENCESTATUSCOMPETITION
(MODEL 1)(MODEL 2)(MODEL 3)(MODEL 1)(MODEL 2)(MODEL 3)(MODEL 1)(MODEL 2)(MODEL 3)(MODEL 1)(MODEL 2)(MODEL 3)
Swedes (ref)
Somalis–1.11***–1.11***–2.03***–1.07***–1.07***–1.42***–1.02***–1.02***–1.50***  0.72***  0.73***  1.71***
Pakistanis–0.66***–0.66***–1.39***–0.50***–0.50***–0.68***–0.21***–0.21***–0.59***  0.50***  0.50***  1.24***
Syrians–0.69***–0.69***–1.44***–0.80***–0.80***–1.08***–0.54***–0.54***–1.16***  0.60***  0.60***  1.37***
Poles–0.65***–0.65***–0.85***–0.46***–0.46***–0.42***–0.51***–0.51***–0.58***  0.37***  0.37***  0.82***
MCP  0.26***  0.26***  0.07†  0.12***  0.11***  0.05  0.07***  0.08***–0.03–0.27***–0.29***–0.07
MCP*Swedes (ref)
MCP*Somalis  0.35***  0.13**  0.18***–0.37***
MCP*Pakistanis  0.27***  0.07  0.15**–0.27***
MCP*Syrians  0.28***  0.10*  0.23***–0.29***
MCP*Poles  0.07–0.02  0.02–0.17**
Gender  0.05  0.04  0.10***  0.10–0.01–0.01–0.00  0.00
Age  0.00  0.00–0.00–0.00  0.00***  0.00***–0.01***–0.01***
Education  0.05  0.04–0.05*–0.05–0.05*–0.05*–0.18***–0.18***
cons  2.02  1.92  2.43  2.64  2.69  2.85  2.00  1.86  2.17  1.62  2.06  1.48
r2  0.25  0.26  0.27  0.29  0.29  0.30  0.27  0.28  0.29  0.14  0.16  0.17

[i] Entries are unstandardized coefficients from OLS regression models. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, p < 0.1.

Figure 2

Effect of treatment group on stereotypes. Results from regression models 1 and 2.

Horizontal lines indicate 95% confidence intervals. Control variables: Model 1: Motivation to control prejudice. Model 2: Motivation to control prejudice, gender, age, education.

Figure 3

The interaction effects between treatment group and MCP on stereotypes. Results from regression model 3.

Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Control variables: Model 3: Gender, age, education.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.541 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 2, 2023
Published on: Jan 23, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Audun Fladmoe, Julia Orupabo, Jan-Paul Brekke, Ferdinand Mohn, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.