Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Minoritizing Processes and Power Relations between Volunteers and Immigrant Participants—An Example from Norway Cover

Minoritizing Processes and Power Relations between Volunteers and Immigrant Participants—An Example from Norway

By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. 2002. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104(3): 783790. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783
  2. Abu-Lughod, L. [1993] 2008. Writing women’s worlds: bedouin stories. Berkley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520934979
  3. Abu-Lughod, L. 2013. Do Muslim women need saving? Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674726338
  4. Ager, A and Strang, A. 2008. Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2): 166191. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fen016
  5. Alvesson, M and Sköldberg, K. 2008. Tolkning och reflektion: Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  6. Brah, A. 1996. Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. London and New York: Routledge.
  7. Brinkmann, S and Kvale, S. 2015. InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  8. Coffey, A and Atkinson, P. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGAE Publications.
  9. Comim, F and Nussbaum, MC. 2014. Capabilities, gender, equality: Towards fundamental entitlements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139059138
  10. Gullestad, M. 2002a. Det norske sett med nye øyne: Kritisk analyse av norsk innvandringsdebatt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  11. Gullestad, M. 2002b. Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1): 4563. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.00098
  12. Gunaratnam, Y. 2003. Researching ‘race’ and ethnicity. London: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9780857024626
  13. Haaland, H and Wallevik, H. 2017. Frivillig sektor som inngangsport til det norske. In: Johnsen, BE (ed.), På vandring og på flukt: Migrasjon i historisk perspektiv. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  14. Hagelund, A and Loga, J. 2009. Frivillighet, innvandring, integrasjon: En kunnskapsoversikt. (Rapport 20091). Oslo/Bergen: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/177672.
  15. Herslund, L and Paulgaard, G. 2021. Refugees’ encounters with nordic rural areas – Darkness, wind and “hygge”! Frontiers in Sociology, 6: 623686. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.623686
  16. Karlsdóttir, A, Sigurjónsdóttir, HR, Heleniak, T and Cuadrado, A. 2020. Learning to live in a new country – Everyday social integration: Civil society and integration – Nordic rural perspective (Nord 2020: 036). Nordic Council of Ministers. DOI: 10.6027/nord2020-036
  17. Klarenbeek, LM. 2019. Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’. Migration Studies. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnz033
  18. Korteweg, AC. 2017. The failures of ‘immigrant integration’: The gendered racialized production of non-belonging. Migration Studies, 5(3): 428444. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnx025
  19. Kunnskapsdepartementet. 2018a. Frivillig innsats og dialog. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/innvandring/kd/Verkemiddel-i-integreringsarbeidet/frivillighet-og-dialog/id2343478/ [Last accessed 31.10.2019].
  20. Kunnskapsdepartementet. 2018b. Integrering gjennom kunnskap: Regjeringens integreringsstrategi 2019–2022. Oslo. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/integrering-gjennom-kunnskap/id2617246/
  21. Malkki, LH. 2015. The need to help: The domestic arts of international humanitarianism. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv125jptn
  22. Naguib, N. 2017. Middle East encounters 69 degrees north latitude: Syrian refugees and everyday humanitarianism in the Arctic. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 49(4): 645660. DOI: 10.1017/S0020743817000630
  23. Nussbaum, MC. 2012. The new religious intolerance: Overcoming the politics of fear in an anxious age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674065918
  24. Predelli, LN, Halsaa, B and Thun, C. 2012. ‘Citizenship Is Not a Word I Use’: How Women’s Movement Activists Understand Citizenship. In: Halsaa, B, Roseneil, S and Sümer, S (eds.), Remaking Citizenship in Multicultural Europe: Women’s Movements, Gender and Diversity. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137272157_9
  25. Rytter, M. 2018. Writing against integration: Danish imaginaries of culture, race and belonging. Ethnos, 84(4): 678697. DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2018.1458745
  26. Samers, M. 1998. Immigration, ‘ethnic minorities’, and ‘social exclusion’ in the European Union: A critical perspective. Geoforum, 29(2): 123144. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00003-7
  27. Schinkel, W. 2018. Against ‘immigrant integration’: For an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1): 31. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1
  28. Simonsen, KB. 2017. Integration af indvandrere i Danmark. Politica: Tidsskrift for Politisk Videnskab, 49(3): 207226.
  29. Sjørslev, I. 2011. The Paradox of Integration: Excluding while Claiming to Integrate into Danish Society. In: Olwig, KF and Pærregaard, K (eds.), The Question of Integration: Immigration, Exclusion and the Danish Welfare State, 7793. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  30. Strang, A and Ager, A. 2010. Refugee integration: Emerging trends and remaining agendas. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4): 589607. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/feq046
  31. Swedberg, R. 2020. Exploratory Research. In: Elman, C, Mahoney, J and Gerring, J (eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science, 1741. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Takle, M. 2013. Democratic mobilisation in immigrant organisations. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3(3): 126134. DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2013-0009
  33. Takle, M. 2015. Immigrant organisations as schools of bureaucracy. Ethnicities, 15(1): 92111. DOI: 10.1177/1468796814546575
  34. Thun, C. 2012a. “Norwegian women got gender equality through their mothers’ milk, but anti-racism is another story”—An analysis of power and resistance in Norwegian feminist discourse. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(1): 3756. DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2011.596162
  35. Thun, C. 2012b. Norwegianness as lived citizenship religious women doing identity work at the intersections of nationality, gender and religion. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 25(1): 125. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2012-01-01
  36. Thun, C. 2015. Inclusive and women-friendly in a time of diversity? The Scandinavian citizenship regime – the ‘childcare lesson’. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 6. DOI: 10.7577/njsr.2080
  37. Timmermans, S and Tavory, I. 2012. Theory construction in qualitative research. Sociological Theory, 30(3): 167186. DOI: 10.1177/0735275112457914
  38. Wimmer, A and Glick Schiller, N. 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation state building migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4): 301334. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0374.00043
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.436 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 37
Submitted on: Apr 25, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 10, 2021
Published on: Mar 7, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Barbara Stein, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.