Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Demands of Beauty: A Kantian Account of the Normative Force of Aesthetic Reasons Cover

The Demands of Beauty: A Kantian Account of the Normative Force of Aesthetic Reasons

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612671
  2. Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
  3. Baxley, Anne Margaret. ‘The Practical Significance of Taste in Kant’s Critique of Judgment: Love of Natural Beauty as a Mark of Moral Character.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2005): 3345. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00179.x
  4. Chignell, Andrew. ‘Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2007): 41533. DOI: 10.1080/00048400701571677
  5. Cohen, Ted. ‘High and Low Thinking about High and Low Art.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (1993): 15156. DOI: 10.2307/431380
  6. Cohen, Ted. ‘Why Beauty Is a Symbol of Morality.’ In Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, edited by Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer, 22136. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
  7. Crawford, Donald. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.
  8. Dancy, Jonathan. ‘Enticing Reasons.’ In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by R. Jay Wallace, Philip Pettit, Samuel Scheffler, and Michael Smith, 91118. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199261888.003.0004
  9. Dunn, Nicholas. ‘Kant and the Demands of Normativity: Response to Harbin.’ Dialogue 59 (2020): 61319. DOI: 10.1017/S001221732000030X
  10. Dyck, John. ‘There Are No Purely Aesthetic Obligations.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102 (2021): 592612. DOI: 10.1111/papq.12346
  11. Geiger, Ido. Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World: A Transcendental Reading of the ‘Critique of the Power of Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781108992565
  12. Gorodeisky, Keren. ‘A New Look at Kant’s View of Aesthetic Testimony.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2010): 5370. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp052
  13. Gorodeisky, Keren, and Eric Marcus. ‘Aesthetic Rationality.’ Journal of Philosophy 115 (2018): 11340. DOI: 10.5840/jphil201811538
  14. Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  15. Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  16. Hamawaki, Arata. ‘Kant on Beauty and the Normative Force of Feeling.’ Philosophical Topics 34 (2006): 10744. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics2006341/25
  17. Harbin, R. Kathleen. ‘Universality without Normativity: Interpreting the Demand of Kantian Judgments of Taste.’ Dialogue 59 (2020): 589612. DOI: 10.1017/S0012217319000398
  18. Hopkins, Robert. ‘Kant, Quasi-Realism, and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgment.’ European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2002): 16689. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0378.00134
  19. Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  20. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Abbreviated as CJ.
  21. Kant, Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic. In Lectures on Logic, translated by Michael Young, 9:1150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  22. Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology. Translated by Robert Louden and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  23. Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, translated by Mary Gregor, 6:203493. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  24. Kant, Immanuel. Notes and Fragments. Translated by Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer, and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  25. Kant, Immanuel. ‘What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?’ In Religion and Rational Theology, translated by Allen Wood and George di Giovanni, 8:133146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  26. King, Alex. ‘The Amoralist and the Anaesthetic.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (2018): 63263. DOI: 10.1111/papq.12225
  27. Kubala, Robbie. ‘Aesthetic Obligations.’ Philosophy Compass 15 (2020). DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12712
  28. Little, Margaret, and Coleen Macnamara. ‘Non-Requiring Reasons.’ In The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason, edited by Ruth Chang and Kurt Sylvan, 393404. London: Routledge, 2020. DOI: 10.4324/9780429266768-33
  29. Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511487279
  30. Lopes, Dominic McIver. Being for Beauty: Aesthetic Agency and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198827214.001.0001
  31. Lopes, Dominic McIver. ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Kantian Aesthetics of Autonomy.’ Estetika 58 (2021): 118. DOI: 10.33134/eeja.251
  32. Matherne, Samantha. ‘Kant on Aesthetic Autonomy and Common Sense.’ Philosopher’s Imprint 19 (2019): 122.
  33. Nehamas, Alexander. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
  34. Riggle, Nick. ‘Toward a Communitarian Theory of Aesthetic Value.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (2022): 1630. DOI: 10.1093/jaac/kpab060
  35. Rogerson, Kenneth. ‘Kant on Beauty and Morality.’ Kant-Studien 95 (2004): 33854. DOI: 10.1515/kant.2004.021
  36. Wallace, R. Jay. ‘The Deontic Structure of Morality.’ In Thinking about Reasons: Themes from the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy, edited by David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little, and Brad Hooker, 13767. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604678.003.0008
  37. Whiting, Daniel. ‘Aesthetic Reasons and the Demands They (Do Not) Make.’ Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2021): 40727. DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqaa045
  38. Zinkin, Melissa. ‘Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.’ Inquiry 55 (2012): 43353. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2012.716194
  39. Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the ‘Critique of Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511487323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.355 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Submitted on: Jul 24, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2023
Published on: Mar 14, 2024
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Jessica J. Williams, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.