The Demands of Beauty: A Kantian Account of the Normative Force of Aesthetic Reasons

Jessica J. Williams

doi:10.33134/eeja.355

The Demands of Beauty: A Kantian Account of the Normative Force of Aesthetic Reasons

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics

Volume 61 (2024): Issue 1

By: Jessica J. Williams

Open Access

|Mar 2024

Abstract

My goal in this paper is to develop a Kantian account of the normative force of aesthetics reasons. While Kant himself would likely side with contemporary theorists who deny that aesthetic considerations, on their own, give rise to oughts and obligations, I argue that Kant’s theory nevertheless gives us resources for explaining the normative force of aesthetic reasons. On this account, while aesthetic properties (in particular, beauty) give us merely enticing or inviting reasons, these reasons acquire greater normative force in the context of aesthetic communities. Insofar as we are members of such communities, we take on special obligations to attend to, appreciate, and preserve particular beautiful objects.

References

Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612671
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baxley, Anne Margaret. ‘The Practical Significance of Taste in Kant’s Critique of Judgment: Love of Natural Beauty as a Mark of Moral Character.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2005): 33–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00179.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chignell, Andrew. ‘Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2007): 415–33. DOI: 10.1080/00048400701571677
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen, Ted. ‘High and Low Thinking about High and Low Art.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (1993): 151–56. DOI: 10.2307/431380
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen, Ted. ‘Why Beauty Is a Symbol of Morality.’ In Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, edited by Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer, 221–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crawford, Donald. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dancy, Jonathan. ‘Enticing Reasons.’ In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by R. Jay Wallace, Philip Pettit, Samuel Scheffler, and Michael Smith, 91–118. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199261888.003.0004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dunn, Nicholas. ‘Kant and the Demands of Normativity: Response to Harbin.’ Dialogue 59 (2020): 613–19. DOI: 10.1017/S001221732000030X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dyck, John. ‘There Are No Purely Aesthetic Obligations.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102 (2021): 592–612. DOI: 10.1111/papq.12346
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Geiger, Ido. Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World: A Transcendental Reading of the ‘Critique of the Power of Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781108992565
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorodeisky, Keren. ‘A New Look at Kant’s View of Aesthetic Testimony.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2010): 53–70. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp052
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorodeisky, Keren, and Eric Marcus. ‘Aesthetic Rationality.’ Journal of Philosophy 115 (2018): 113–40. DOI: 10.5840/jphil201811538
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamawaki, Arata. ‘Kant on Beauty and the Normative Force of Feeling.’ Philosophical Topics 34 (2006): 107–44. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics2006341/25
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harbin, R. Kathleen. ‘Universality without Normativity: Interpreting the Demand of Kantian Judgments of Taste.’ Dialogue 59 (2020): 589–612. DOI: 10.1017/S0012217319000398
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hopkins, Robert. ‘Kant, Quasi-Realism, and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgment.’ European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2002): 166–89. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0378.00134
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Abbreviated as CJ.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. The Jäsche Logic. In Lectures on Logic, translated by Michael Young, 9:1–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology. Translated by Robert Louden and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, translated by Mary Gregor, 6:203–493. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Notes and Fragments. Translated by Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer, and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. ‘What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?’ In Religion and Rational Theology, translated by Allen Wood and George di Giovanni, 8:133–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
King, Alex. ‘The Amoralist and the Anaesthetic.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (2018): 632–63. DOI: 10.1111/papq.12225
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kubala, Robbie. ‘Aesthetic Obligations.’ Philosophy Compass 15 (2020). DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12712
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Little, Margaret, and Coleen Macnamara. ‘Non-Requiring Reasons.’ In The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason, edited by Ruth Chang and Kurt Sylvan, 393–404. London: Routledge, 2020. DOI: 10.4324/9780429266768-33
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511487279
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lopes, Dominic McIver. Being for Beauty: Aesthetic Agency and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198827214.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lopes, Dominic McIver. ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Kantian Aesthetics of Autonomy.’ Estetika 58 (2021): 1–18. DOI: 10.33134/eeja.251
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matherne, Samantha. ‘Kant on Aesthetic Autonomy and Common Sense.’ Philosopher’s Imprint 19 (2019): 1–22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nehamas, Alexander. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riggle, Nick. ‘Toward a Communitarian Theory of Aesthetic Value.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (2022): 16–30. DOI: 10.1093/jaac/kpab060
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogerson, Kenneth. ‘Kant on Beauty and Morality.’ Kant-Studien 95 (2004): 338–54. DOI: 10.1515/kant.2004.021
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wallace, R. Jay. ‘The Deontic Structure of Morality.’ In Thinking about Reasons: Themes from the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy, edited by David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little, and Brad Hooker, 137–67. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604678.003.0008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whiting, Daniel. ‘Aesthetic Reasons and the Demands They (Do Not) Make.’ Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2021): 407–27. DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqaa045
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zinkin, Melissa. ‘Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.’ Inquiry 55 (2012): 433–53. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2012.716194
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the ‘Critique of Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511487323
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article