Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mirrors, Windows, and Paintings Cover

References

  1. Alberti, Leon Battista. On Painting. Translated by Cecil Grayson. New York: Penguin, 1991.
  2. Berkeley, George. First Dialogue between Hylas and Philonous in Opposition to Sceptics and Atheists in Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  3. Block, Ned. ‘Why Do Mirrors Reverse Right/Left but Not Up/Down.’ Journal of Philosophy 71 (1974): 25977. DOI: 10.2307/2024963
  4. Clarke, Austen. ‘Three Varieties of Visual Field.’ Philosophical Psychology 9 (1996): 47795. DOI: 10.1080/09515089608573196
  5. Casati, Roberto. ‘Mirrors, Illusions and Epistemic Innocence.’ In Perceptual Illusions. Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Clotilde Calabi, 192201. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012. DOI: 10.1057/9780230365292_11
  6. Cutting, James E. ‘Rigidity in Cinema Seen from the Front Row, Side Aisle.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (1987): 32334. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.323
  7. David, Armstrong. ‘Colour Realism and the Argument from Microscopes.’ In Contemporary Philosophy in Australia, edited by Robert Brown and C. D. Rollins, 30123. New York: Humanities Press, 1969.
  8. da Vinci, Leonardo. Trattato della Pittura. Milan: Società Tipografica Classici Italiani, 1804.
  9. Edgerton, Samuel. The Mirror, the Window and the Telescope: How Renaissance Linear Perspective Changed Our Vision of the Universe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.
  10. Goldstein, E. Bruce. ‘Spatial Layout, Orientation Relative to the Observer, and Perceived Projection in Pictures Viewed at an Angle.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptual Performance 13 (1987): 25666. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.2.256
  11. Halloran, Thomas O. ‘Picture Perception Is Array Specific: Viewing Angle versus Apparent Orientation.’ Perception and Psychophysics 45 (1989): 46782. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210721
  12. Hilbert, David. Color and Color Perception. A Study in Anthropocentric Realism, CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford, CA, 1987.
  13. Kubovy, Michael. The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  14. Manetti, Antonio T. The Life of Brunelleschi. Translated by Catherine Enggass. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.
  15. Matthen, Mohan. ‘Ephemeral Vision.’ In Perceptual Ephemera, edited by Thomas Crowther and Clare Mac Cumhaill, 31236. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198722304.003.0015
  16. Matthen, Mohan. Seeing, Doing and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  17. Mizrahi, Vivian. ‘Mirrors and Misleading Appearances.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2019): 35467. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2018.1481119
  18. Nanay, Bence. ‘Threefoldness.’ Philosophical Studies 175 (2018): 16382. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-017-0860-2
  19. Pirenne, Maurice Henri. Optics, Painting, and Photography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
  20. Polanyi, Michael. ‘What Is a Painting?’ British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (1970): 22536. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/10.3.225
  21. Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. N.p.: Digireads.com, 2018.
  22. Steenhagen, Maarten. ‘False Reflections.’ Philosophical Studies 174 (2017): 122742. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0752-x
  23. Vendler, Zeno. ‘The Ineffable Soul.’ In The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, edited by Richard Warner and Tadeusz Szubka, 31728. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
  24. Vishwanath, Dhanraj, Ahna R. Girshick, and Martin S. Banks. ‘Why Pictures Look Right When Viewed from the Wrong Place.’ Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005): 140110. DOI: 10.1038/nn1553
  25. Wollheim, Richard. ‘Seeing-as, Seeing-in, and Pictorial Representation.’ In Art and Its Object, 2nd ed., 20526. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.200 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 32
Submitted on: Apr 9, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 12, 2021
Published on: Mar 15, 2022
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Clotilde Calabi, Wolfgang Huemer, Marco Santambrogio, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.