Aesthetic Understanding

Jeremy Page

doi:10.33134/eeja.269

Aesthetic Understanding

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics

Volume 59 (2022): Issue 1

By: Jeremy Page

Open Access

|Mar 2022

Abstract

Winner of the Fabian Dorsch ESA Essay Prize.

In this paper, I introduce an account of aesthetic understanding. Recent discussions of aesthetic understanding have associated it with aesthetic justification and with understanding why, for example, a given object is aesthetically valuable. I introduce a notion of aesthetic understanding as a form of objectual understanding, which I refer to as ‘appreciative understanding’. Appreciative understanding is related to and partly constituted by an agent’s capacity to comprehend and experience an artwork holistically and to communicate effectively regarding its particular aesthetic character and value. I then argue for the understanding account of aesthetic judgement on which the paradigmatic form of aesthetic judgement is grounded on appreciative understanding. This argument partly consists in demonstrating how the understanding account can explain the autonomy of aesthetic judgement. In closing, I explore the potential of the understanding account to explain the structure of our appreciative practices. That is, I put forward the view that our appreciative practices are structured so as to promote appreciative understanding.

References

Breitenbach, Angela. ‘One Imagination in Experiences of Beauty and Achievements of Understanding.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 60 (2020): 71–88. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayz048
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burge, Tyler. ‘Content Preservation.’ Philosophical Review 102 (1993): 457–88. DOI: 10.2307/1523046
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carroll, Noël. ‘Hume’s Standard of Taste.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (1984): 181–94. DOI: 10.1111/1540_6245.jaac43.2.0181
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cavedon-Taylor, Dan. ‘Reasoned and Unreasoned Judgement: On Inference, Acquaintance and Aesthetic Normativity.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (2017): 1–17. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayw088
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark, Timothy J. The Sight of Death: An Experiment in Art Writing. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collingwood, R. G. The Principles of Art. Oxford: Clarendon, 1968.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cooper, Neil. ‘Understanding.’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 68 (1994): 1–26. DOI: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/68.1.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cross, Anthony. ‘Art Criticism as Practical Reasoning.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (2017): 299–317. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayx016
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dorsch, Fabian. ‘Non-Inferentialism About Justification – The Case of Aesthetic Judgements.’ Philosophical Quarterly 63 (2013): 660–82. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9213.12063
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goldie, Peter. ‘Virtues of Art and Human Well-Being.’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (2008): 179–95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2008.00168.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorodeisky, Keren. ‘The Authority of Pleasure.’ Noûs 55 (2021): 199–220. DOI: 10.1111/nous.12310
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorodeisky, Keren. ‘On Liking Aesthetic Value.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2021): 261–80. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12641
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorodeisky, Keren, and Eric Marcus. ‘Aesthetic Rationality.’ Journal of Philosophy 115 (2018): 113–40. DOI: 10.5840/jphil201811538
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grimm, Stephen. ‘The Value of Understanding.’ Philosophy Compass 7 (2012): 103–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00460.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hills, Alison. ‘Aesthetic Testimony, Understanding and Virtue.’ Noûs. Published ahead of print, 2 July 2020. DOI: 10.1111/nous.12344
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hills, Alison. ‘Aesthetic Understanding.’ In Making Sense of the World: New Essays on the Philosophy of Understanding, edited by Stephen Grimm, 159–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hills, Alison. ‘Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology.’ Ethics 120 (2009): 94–127. DOI: 10.1086/648610
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hills, Alison. ‘Understanding Why.’ Noûs 49 (2015): 661–88. DOI: 10.1111/nous.12092
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holliday, John. ‘Emotional Intimacy in Literature.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (2018): 1–16. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayx033
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hopkins, Robert. ‘How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony.’ Journal of Philosophy 108 (2011): 138–57. DOI: 10.5840/jphil201110838
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Isenberg, Arnold. ‘Critical Communication.’ Philosophical Review 58 (1949): 330–44. DOI: 10.2307/2182081
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
King, Alex. ‘In Defence of Robust Aesthetic Normativity.’ Unpublished manuscript.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kubala, Robbie. Review of Being for Beauty: Aesthetic Agency and Value, by Dominic McIver Lopes. Estetika 56 (2019): 250–62. DOI: 10.33134/eeja.192
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511498909
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lamarque, Peter. ‘Aesthetics and Literature: A Problematic Relation?’ Philosophical Studies 135 (2007): 27–40. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-007-9090-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lamarque, Peter. ‘Appreciation and Literary Interpretation.’ In Is There a Single Right Interpretation, edited by Michael Krausz, 285–306. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002. DOI: 10.5325/j.ctv14gp0qq.18
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Livingston, Paisley. ‘On an Apparent Truism in Aesthetics.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2003): 260–78. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.3.260
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lord, Errol. ‘How to Learn about Aesthetics and Morality through Acquaintance and Deference.’ Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13 (2018): 71–97. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198823841.003.0004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malfatti, Federica I. ‘Can Testimony Transmit Understanding?’ Theoria 86 (2020): 54–72. DOI: 10.1111/theo.12220
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martínez Marín, Irene. ‘Non-standard Emotions and Aesthetic Understanding.’ Estetika 57 (2020): 135–49. DOI: 10.33134/eeja.211
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mothersill, Mary. ‘Critical Reasons.’ Philosophical Quarterly 11 (1961): 74–78. DOI: 10.2307/2216682
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nehamas, Alexander. Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nguyen, C. Thi. ‘Autonomy and Aesthetic Engagement.’ Mind 129 (2019): 1127–56. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzz054
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Page, Jeremy. ‘Literary Appreciation and the Reconfiguration of Understanding.’ In Educating Character through the Arts, edited by Panos Paris, Aidan Thompson, and Laura D’Olimpio. London: Routledge, forthcoming.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peet, Andrew. ‘Testimony and the Epistemic Uncertainty of Interpretation.’ Philosophical Studies 173 (2016): 395–416. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-015-0498-x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pollock, Joey. ‘Linguistic Understanding and Testimonial Warrant.’ Erkenntnis. Published ahead of print, 20 February 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-020-00362-w
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ransom, Madeleine. ‘Frauds, Posers and Sheep: A Virtue Theoretic Solution to the Acquaintance Debate.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2019): 417–34. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12467
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ridley, Aaron. ‘The Philosophy of Medium-Grade Art.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996): 413–23. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.4.413
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riggle, Nick. ‘On the Aesthetic Ideal.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (2015): 433–47. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayv026
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robinson, Jenefer. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. DOI: 10.1093/0199263655.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robson, Jon. ‘Is Perception the Canonical Route to Aesthetic Judgment?’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2018): 657–68. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1389964
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rowland, Richard. ‘The Authoritative Normativity of Fitting Attitudes.’ Oxford Studies in Metaethics 17, forthcoming.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schellekens Dammann, Elisabeth. ‘Seeing the Light: Aesthetic Experience and Understanding Pictures.’ In The Pleasure of Pictures: Pictorial Experience and Aesthetic Appreciation, edited by Jerome Pelletier and Alberto Voltolini, 21–35. London: Routledge, 2018. DOI: 10.4324/9781315112640-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schjeldahl, Peter. Hot, Cold, Heavy, Light, 100 Art Writings 1988–2018. New York: Abrams, 2019.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scruton, Roger. The Aesthetic Understanding: Essays in the Philosophy of Art and Culture. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sibley, Frank. ‘Aesthetic and Nonaesthetic.’ Philosophical Review 74 (1965): 135–59. DOI: 10.2307/2183262
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sibley, Frank. ‘Particularity, Art and Evaluation.’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 48 (1974): 1–22. DOI: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/48.1.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strevens, Michael. ‘No Understanding without Explanation.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (2013): 510–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.12.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tanner, Michael. ‘Ethics and Aesthetics Are – ?’ In Art and Morality, edited by Jose Luis Bermudez and Sebastian Gardner, 19–36. London: Routledge, 2003. DOI: 10.4324/9781003060222-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tolstoy, Leo. What Is Art? Translated by Larissa Volokhonsky and Richard Pevear. London: Penguin, 1995.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zagzebski, Linda. On Epistemology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zagzebski, Linda. ‘Toward a Theory of Understanding.’ In Varieties of Understanding: New Perspectives from Philosophy, Psychology, and Theology, edited by Stephen R. Grimm, 123–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190860974.003.0007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article