Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam and Eravacycline Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in China and Analysis of Sulbactam-Durlobactam Resistance Mechanisms Cover

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam and Eravacycline Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in China and Analysis of Sulbactam-Durlobactam Resistance Mechanisms

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

graphic/j_pjm-2026-019_ufig_001.jpg
Table I

Distribution of clinical specimens by department.

DepartmentNumber of strainsPercentage
Intensive Care Unit (ICU)10846.35%
Emergency Ward6327.04%
Medical Insurance Center2410.30%
Hematology Department93.86%
General Surgery Department93.86%
Other Departments208.58%
Total233100%
Table II

Distribution of clinical specimens by specimen type.

Specimen typeNumber of strainsPercentage
Respiratory tract (sputum, oropharyngeal swabs, bronchoscopy specimens)16872.10%
Sterile body fluids (pleural fluid, ascitic fluid, drainage fluid)3515.02%
Blood198.15%
Wound swabs52.15%
Urine62.58%
Total233100%
Table III

Antimicrobial susceptibility test results of 233 CRAB strains to SUL-DUR, ERV, and common antimicrobial agents.

AntibioticsSusceptible S (%)Intermediate I (%)Drug Resistance R (%)
Sulbactam-durlobactam92.31.76
Eravacycline91.4--
Tigecycline75.020.05.0
Ciprofloxacin5.8-94.2
Ampicillin-sulbactam9.2-90.8
Levofloxacin5.85.788.5
Gentamicin4.6-95.4
Amikacin12.73.483.9
Piperacillin-tazobactam2.21.196.7
Ceftazidime6.82.291.0
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole15.55.579
Gentamicin4.69.286.2
Imipenem0-100
Meropenem0-100
Table IV

Cross-Analysis of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Results of CRAB to SUL-DUR and ERV[n(%)].

SUL-DURERVTotal
SusceptibleNon-susceptible
Susceptible195(83.7)20 (8.6)215 (92.3)
Non-susceptible18 (7.7)0 (0)18 (7.7)
Total213 (91.4)20 (8.6)233 (100)
Table V

Department and specimen source of Acinetobacter baumannii strains non-susceptible to SUL-DUR and ERV.

Drug-resistant typeNumber of strainsDepartment source (Strains)Specimen type source (Strains)
Non-susceptible to SUL-DUR18ICU (11), Emergency Ward (4), Hematology Department (2), Medical Insurance Center (1)Sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (15), Sterile site secretions (2), Blood (1)
Non-susceptible to ERV20ICU (11), Emergency Ward (4), Neurosurgery (1), Hematology Department (1), Urology (1), Thoracic Surgery (1), Medical Insurance Ward (1)Sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (15), Sterile site drainage fluid (4), Clean-catch midstream urine (1)
Fig. 1.

Distribution of resistance genes among the 14 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Fig. 2.

Distribution of virulence genes among the 14 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Fig. 3.

Heatmap of β-lactamase genotype correspondence among the 14 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Blue indicates the strain contains the corresponding genotype; white indicates the absence of the genotype.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2026-019 | Journal eISSN: 2544-4646 | Journal ISSN: 1733-1331
Language: English
Page range: 210 - 219
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2026
Accepted on: May 6, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: Polish Society of Microbiologists
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Xuelian He, Shang Ma, Yanyan Zhou, Jingjuan Wei, Zhongling Zhuo, Liyan Ma, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.