Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

The seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle using i-ELISA and relationship with different disease-related risk factors in district Bannu, KPK, Pakistan_
| Variables | Category | N | i-ELISA (positive) | i-ELISA (negative) | p-value | OR | Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.L | U.L | |||||||
| Breed | Local | 179 | 11 (6.1%) | 168 (93.9%) | 0.245 | |||
| Cross bred | 72 | 06 (8.3%) | 66 (91.7%) | |||||
| Exotic | 33 | 0 (0%) | 33 (100%) | |||||
| Age | < 5 years | 47 | 3 (6.4%) | 44 (93.6%) | 0.453 | |||
| > 5 years | 222 | 12 (5.4%) | 210 (94.6%) | |||||
| > 10 years | 15 | 02 (13.3%) | 13 (86.7%) | |||||
| Sex | Male | 54 | 05 (09.3%) | 49 (90.7%) | 0.26 | 1.854 | 0.624 | 5.504 |
| Female | 230 | 12 (5.2%) | 218 (94.8%) | |||||
| Purpose | Dairy | 229 | 12 (5.2%) | 217 (94.8%) | 0.28 | 0.553 | 0.186 | 1.641 |
| Beef | 55 | 05 (9.1%) | 50 (90.9%) | |||||
| Grazing | Open grazing | 256 | 10 (3.9%) | 246(96.1%) | 0.001* | 0.122 | 0.042 | 0.353 |
| Confined grazing | 28 | 07 (25%) | 21 (75%) | |||||
| Breeding protocol | AI | 180 | 04 (2.2%) | 176(97.8%) | 0.0001* | 0.119 | 0.034 | 0.415 |
| Natural mating | 50 | 08 (16%) | 42 (84%) | |||||
| Immunized against brucellosis | Yes | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| No | 284 | 17 (6%) | 267 (94%) | |||||
| Other vaccination | Yes | 257 | 14 (05.4%) | 24 3(94.6%) | 0.238 | 0.461 | 0.124 | 1.718 |
| No | 27 | 03 (11.1%) | 24 (88.9%) | |||||
| Health status | Healthy | 244 | 17 (07%) | 227 (93%) | 0.085 | 1.176 | 1.118 | 1.237 |
| Emaciated | 40 | 0 | 40 (100%) | |||||
| Retained placenta | Yes | 58 | 03 (5.2%) | 55 (94.8%) | 0.986 | 0.988 | 0.258 | 3.78 |
| No | 172 | 09 (5.2%) | 163 (94.8%) | |||||
| Abortion history | Yes | 31 | 09 (29%) | 22 (71%) | 0.0001* | 26.727 | 6.731 | 106.128 |
| No | 199 | 03 (1.5%) | 196 (98.5%) | |||||
| Pregnancy status | Pregnant | 78 | 03 (3.8%) | 75 (96.2%) | 0.503 | 0.636 | 0.167 | 2.418 |
| Non-pregnant | 152 | 09 (5.9%) | 143(94.1%) | |||||
| Repeat breeding | Yes | 70 | 09 (12.9%) 03 (1.9%) | 61 (87.1%) | 0.001* | 7.721 | 2.022 | 29.479 |
| No | 160 | 0 | 157 (98.1%) | |||||
| Previous calving | Normal | 204 | 12 (5.9%) | 192 (94.1%) | 0.204 | 1.135 | 1.081 | 1.192 |
| Dystocia | 26 | 0 | 26 (100%) | |||||
Primer used for detection of brucellosis_
| Primer Name | Sequence (5′–3′) | Amplicon (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| Brucella abortus IS711 | F: GACGAACGCAATTTTTCCAATCCC | 498 |
| Brucella melitensis IS711 | F: AAATCGCGTCCTTGCTGGTCTGA | 731 |
| Brucella ovis IS711 | F: CGGGTTCTGGCACCATCGTCG | 976 |
| Brucella suis IS711 | F: GCGCGGTTTTCTGAAGGTGGTTCGGG | 285 |
Overall seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle through RBPT, i-ELISA in district Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan_
| Animals type | Total number of samples | Serological examination | Molecular identification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle | 384 | RBPT | i-ELISA | (AMOS-PCR) |
| 72 (18.75%) | 31 (8%) | 4 (1.04%) | ||
Seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle through RBPT and relationship with different disease-related risk factors_
| Variables | Category | N | RBPT (positive) | RBPT (negative) | p-value | OR | Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.L | U.L | |||||||
| Breed | Local | 179 | 29 (16.2%) | 150 (83.8%) | 0.162 | |||
| Cross bred | 72 | 15 (20.8%) | 57 (79.2%) | |||||
| Exotic | 33 | 02 (6.1%) | 31 (93.9%) | |||||
| Age | < 5years | 47 | 4 (8.5%) | 43 (91.5%) | 0.070 | |||
| > 5 years | 222 | 37 (16.7%) | 185 (83.3%) | |||||
| > 10 years | 15 | 05 (33.3%) | 10 (66.7%) | |||||
| Sex | Male | 54 | 11 (20.4%) | 43 (79.6%) | 0.355 | 1.425 | 0.671 | 3.028 |
| Female | 230 | 35 (15.2%) | 195 (84.8%) | |||||
| Purpose | Dairy | 229 | 35 (15.3%) | 194 (84.7%) | 0.394 | 0.722 | 0.340 | 1.531 |
| Beef | 55 | 11 (20%) | 44 (80%) | |||||
| Grazing | Open grazing | 256 | 36 (14.1%) | 220 (85.9%) | 0.003* | 0.295 | 0.126 | 0.689 |
| Confined grazing | 28 | 10 (35.7%) | 18 (64.3%) | |||||
| Breeding protocol | A.I | 180 | 15 (8.3%) | 165(91.7%) | 0.0001* | 0.136 | 0.063 | 0.296 |
| Natural mating | 50 | 20 (40%) | 30 (60%) | |||||
| Immunized against brucellosis | Yes | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| No | 284 | 46(16.2%) | 238(83.8%) | |||||
| Other vaccination | Yes | 257 | 42 (16.3%) | 215 (83.7%) | 0.838 | 1.123 | 0.369 | 3.415 |
| No | 27 | 4 (14.8%) | 23 (85.2%) | |||||
| Health status | Healthy | 244 | 42 (17.2%) | 202 (82.8%) | 0.251 | 1.871 | 0.632 | 5.539 |
| Emaciated | 40 | 04 (10%) | 36 (90%) | |||||
| Retained placenta | Yes | 58 | 15 (25.9%) | 43 (74.1%) | 0.009* | 2.651 | 1.252 | 5.614 |
| No | 172 | 20 (11.6%) | 152 (88.4%) | |||||
| Abortion history | Yes | 31 | 16(51.6%) | 15 (48.4%) | 0.0 001* | 10.105 | 4.326 | 23.604 |
| No | 199 | 19 (9.5%) | 180(90.5%) | |||||
| Pregnancy status | Pregnant | 78 | 7 (9%) | 71 (91%) | 0.059 | 0.437 | 0.181 | 1.051 |
| Non-pregnant | 152 | 28 (18.4%) | 124 (81.6%) | |||||
| Repeat breeding | Yes | 70 | 20 (28.6%) | 50 (71.4%) | 0.0001* | 3.867 | 1.840 | 8.126 |
| No | 160 | 15 (9.4%) | 145 (90.6%) | |||||
| Previous calving | Normal | 204 | 33 (16.2%) | 171 (83.8%) | 0.257 | 2.316 | 0.522 | 10.274 |
| Dystocia | 26 | 2 (7.7%) | 24 (92.3%) | |||||