Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of Acetic Acid Reduction by Adding NaHSO3 in Actinobacillus succinogenes GXAS137 Cover

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of Acetic Acid Reduction by Adding NaHSO3 in Actinobacillus succinogenes GXAS137

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Analysis of fermentation products.
A) The comparison of metabolites was determined by HPLC in the experimental group (EG) and control check (CK); 1 – pyruvic acid, 2 – lactic acid, 3 – acetic acid, 4 – pyruvate dimer, 5 – unknown, 6 – citric acid, 7 – succinic acid B) The concentration of organic acid and biomass of EG and CK. Each value is the mean for three replicates, with vertical bars indicating standard errors. The lower-case letters at each time point indicate a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 by Duncans multiple range tests.
Analysis of fermentation products. A) The comparison of metabolites was determined by HPLC in the experimental group (EG) and control check (CK); 1 – pyruvic acid, 2 – lactic acid, 3 – acetic acid, 4 – pyruvate dimer, 5 – unknown, 6 – citric acid, 7 – succinic acid B) The concentration of organic acid and biomass of EG and CK. Each value is the mean for three replicates, with vertical bars indicating standard errors. The lower-case letters at each time point indicate a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 by Duncans multiple range tests.

Fig. 2.

Scatter plot of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment for DEGs between CK and EG. Rich factor refers to the ratio of the number of genes annotated to the pathway in the DEGs to the total number of genes located at the pathway among all annotated.
Scatter plot of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment for DEGs between CK and EG. Rich factor refers to the ratio of the number of genes annotated to the pathway in the DEGs to the total number of genes located at the pathway among all annotated.

Fig. 3.

Relative expression levels of 12 DEGs when a reference gene 16S rDNA was used for normalization.
Different lowercase letters in the table show significant differences (p < 0.05).
Relative expression levels of 12 DEGs when a reference gene 16S rDNA was used for normalization. Different lowercase letters in the table show significant differences (p < 0.05).

Fig. 4.

Metabolism map of the central metabolic pathway of A. succinogenes, the green arrow represents the C3 pathway. All green arrows represent the C3 pathway, and the green dotted line represents pathway disruption.
Metabolites: G-6-P – glucose-6-phosphate, F-6-P – fructose-6-phosphate, G-3-P – glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, Glycerate-3-P – glycerate-3-phosphate, Glycerate-2-P – glycerate-2-phosphate, PEP – phosphoenolpyruvate, OAA – oxaloacetic acid, Mal – malic acid, Fum – fumaric acid, SA – succinic acid, Pyr – pyruvic acid, For – formic acid, AcCOA – acetyl-COA, AcP – acetylphosphate, AC – acetic acid, AcAld – acetaldehyde, EtOH – ethanol, BAC – bisulfite-acetaldehyde complex
Enzymes: PGAM – phosphoglycerate mutase, ENO – enolase, PEPCK – PEP carboxykinase, ASPC – aspartate aminotransferase, MDH – malate dehydrogenase, FM – fumarase, FRD – fumarate reductase, OAD – oxaloacetate decarboxylase, PK – pyruvate kinase, PDH – pyruvate dehydrogenase, PFL – pyruvate formate-lyase, FDH – formate dehydrogenase, PTA – phosphate acetyltransferase, ACK – acetate kinase, ADHE – acetaldehyde-alcohol dehydrogenase. LipB – lipoyl-transferase, LipA – lipoyl-synthase
Metabolism map of the central metabolic pathway of A. succinogenes, the green arrow represents the C3 pathway. All green arrows represent the C3 pathway, and the green dotted line represents pathway disruption. Metabolites: G-6-P – glucose-6-phosphate, F-6-P – fructose-6-phosphate, G-3-P – glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, Glycerate-3-P – glycerate-3-phosphate, Glycerate-2-P – glycerate-2-phosphate, PEP – phosphoenolpyruvate, OAA – oxaloacetic acid, Mal – malic acid, Fum – fumaric acid, SA – succinic acid, Pyr – pyruvic acid, For – formic acid, AcCOA – acetyl-COA, AcP – acetylphosphate, AC – acetic acid, AcAld – acetaldehyde, EtOH – ethanol, BAC – bisulfite-acetaldehyde complex Enzymes: PGAM – phosphoglycerate mutase, ENO – enolase, PEPCK – PEP carboxykinase, ASPC – aspartate aminotransferase, MDH – malate dehydrogenase, FM – fumarase, FRD – fumarate reductase, OAD – oxaloacetate decarboxylase, PK – pyruvate kinase, PDH – pyruvate dehydrogenase, PFL – pyruvate formate-lyase, FDH – formate dehydrogenase, PTA – phosphate acetyltransferase, ACK – acetate kinase, ADHE – acetaldehyde-alcohol dehydrogenase. LipB – lipoyl-transferase, LipA – lipoyl-synthase

Primer sequences of differentially expressed genes in Actimobacillus succinogenes for qRT-PCR analysis_

Gene IDFunctionPrimer sequence (5’ to 3’)Product size (bp)
CBG46_04720short-chain dehydrogenaseF: GCTAACCAAATCGCTGGCTA173
R: GTAACTCTTCCGGTTTGCCT
CBG46_04260phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinaseF: TCGAACGCATGAAAGCCTC188
R: ACCCGGTAATGCTTTAGGAA
CBG46_02425bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate mutaseF: TAAACCTTTTCACCGGCTGGA183
R: GCACCCATAATTGGTCGGAT
CBG46_04200phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (NADP+-dependent decarboxylating)F: GCATCCGAGCAATTCGACT187
R: GCCAATCCGCCATAGCATT
CBG46_04725ATPaseF: TATCACTACATTGGCGGGCTA181
R: AATTTGATTCAGCGTCCAGT
CBG46_02335bifunctional acetaldehyde-alcohol dehydrogenaseF: CCAACACGGCACATTAGCAT191
R: ATATCACGCCAACCGGATCG
CBG46_03325L-threonine dehydrogenaseF: ATCGAAGCCTACGTATCCAC197
R: ATCGCATGAACATAGCCGAGA
CBG46_08215ribose 5-phosphate isomerase BF: GAGCGTGGAATTCTTACCTG160
R: CAATCACACGCTCACCGAA
CBG46_059652-deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolaseF: CTGCCGCGATTTAAACGTC174
R: GCACCGGCATTAATCATTGCT
CBG46_07640sulfate ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinF: ATAGCAAGATTAACGGCACCC174
R: ACTTTTCATTCACGTCGAAGG
CBG46_00190sulfurtransferase TusEF: CAACAACAGATTGAAACCGA170
R: CCGGCGAAGTTTTGTATTCCT
CBG46_00510pyruvate dehydrogenaseF: CAATCTTACGCCATGTTCGTG191
R: CGGCTTATCGGACATCACT
16S rDNAreference genesF: ACTGGAACTGAGACACGGT187
R: GCTTCTTCTGTGGCTAACGTC

The quality control data statistic table after filtering_

SampleSample descriptionTotal readsBases (bp)Q20 (%)Q30 (%)Uniq mapped reads
CK_1Control replication 131,227,9584,230,512,86598.4395.2830,230,330 (96.81%)
CK_2Control replication 229,665,4064,045,453,27098.3395.0128,618,805 (96.47%)
CK_3Control replication 333,864,2864,615,803,04398.3695.0832,895,101 (97.14%)
EG_1NaHSO3 treatment replication 135,209,9044,761,438,25698.3795.1033,873,034 (96.2%)
EG_2NaHSO3 treatment replication 232,640,3964,435,226,53998.495.1631,262,811 (95.78%)
EG_3NaHSO3 treatment replication 335,564,7744,849,551,15298.3395.0034,078,998 (95.82%)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2023-036 | Journal eISSN: 2544-4646 | Journal ISSN: 1733-1331
Language: English
Page range: 399 - 411
Submitted on: Jul 23, 2023
|
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2023
|
Published on: Dec 16, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Shiyong Li, Chaodong Song, Hongyan Zhang, Yan Qin, Mingguo Jiang, Naikun Shen, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.