Prevalence of Closely Related Candida albicans Species among Patients with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Southern Poland Based on the hwp1 Gene Amplification

KLESIEWICZ, KAROLINA; MROWIEC, PAULINA; KANIA, KATARZYNA; SKIBA-KUREK, IWONA; BIAŁECKA, JOANNA; NAMYSŁ, MAGDALENA; MAŁEK, MARIANNA

doi:10.33073/pjm-2023-011

Abstract

Candida albicans remains the most common species isolated from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. However, closely related species such as Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis may also occur, although they are often misidentified. The aim of the study was to confirm the phenotypic identification of C. albicans and its closely related species isolated from women with genital tract infections by amplification of the hwp1 (hyphal wall protein 1) gene in a PCR assay. We report a detailed molecular identification of C. albicans and its closely related species among 326 patients in the Małopolska region, Poland. Initial phenotypic identifications were confirmed by amplification of the hwp1 gene. Based on molecular analysis, we revealed 307 strains (94.17%) as C. albicans and 17 as C. dubliniensis (5.22%). No strain of C. africana was detected. Two patients h ad co-infection with C. albicans and C. dubliniensis (0.61%). A PCR assay targeting the hwp1 gene was reliable for correctly identifying species among the C. albicans complex.

References

Borman AM, Szekely A, Linton CJ, Palmer MD, Brown P, Johnson EM. Epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, and pathogenicity of Candida africana isolates from the United Kingdom. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):967–972. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02816-12
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Byadarahally Raju S, Rajappa S. Isolation and identification of Candida from the oral cavity. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:487921. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/487921
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CLSI. Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. 3rd ed. CLSI supplement M27M44S. Wayne (USA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Criseo G, Scordino F, Romeo O. Current methods for identifying clinically important cryptic Candida species. J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Apr;111:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.02.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cuenca-Estrella M, Gomez-Lopez A, Mellado E, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Correlation between the procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida spp. of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and four commercial techniques. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Jun;11(6):486–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01166.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Denning DW, Kneale M, Sobel JD, Rautemaa-Richardson R. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):e339–e347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30103-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EUCAST. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 10.0. Basel (Switzerland): The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 29]. Available from http://www.eucast.org/astoffungi/clinicalbreakpointsforantifungals
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Farr A, Effendy I, Frey Tirri B, Hof H, Mayser P, Petricevic L, Ruhnke M, Schaller M, Schaefer APA, Sustr V, et al. Guideline: vulvovaginal candidosis (AWMF 015/072, level S2k). Mycoses. 2021 Jun;64(6):583–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13248
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gharehbolagh SA, Fallah B, Izadi A, Ardestani ZS, Malekifar P, M Borman A, Mahmoudi S. Distribution, antifungal susceptibility pattern and intra-Candida albicans species complex prevalence of Candida africana: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Aug;15(8):e0237046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237046
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gumral R, Sancak B, Guzel AB, Saraçlı MA, Ilkit M. Lack of Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis in vaginal Candida albicans isolates in Turkey using HWP1 gene polymorphisms. Mycopathologia. 2011 Jul;172(1):73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-011-9401-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hazirolan G, Altun HU, Gumral R, Gursoy NC, Otlu B, Sancak B. Prevalence of Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis, in vulvovaginal candidiasis: first Turkish Candida africana isolates from vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Mycol Med. 2017 Sep;27(3):376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.04.106
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hedayati MT, Taheri Z, Galinimoghadam T, Aghili SR, Yazdani Cherati J, Mosayebi E. Isolation of different species of Candida in patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis from Sari, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015 Apr;8(4):e15992. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.8(4)2015.15992
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu Y, Yu A, Chen X, Wang G, Feng X. Molecular characterization of Candida africana in genital specimens in Shanghai, China. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:185387. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/185387
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jamilian M, Mashadi E, Sarmadi F, Banijamali M, Farhadi E, Ghanatpishe E. [Frequancy of vulvovaginal Candidiasis species in nonpregnant 15–50 years old women in spring 2005 in Arak] (in Persian). J Arak Uni Med Sci 2007;10(2):7–14. http://jams.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-5-en.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kasprowicz A, Białecka A. [Atlas of vaginal purity degrees. Research procedures, interpretation of results] (in Polish). Wrocław (Poland): MesPharm; 2012. p. 5–45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kolekar K, Tambe S, Aderao R, Nayak C. Chronic vulvovaginitis caused by Candida dubliniensis in an immunologically competent adult female. Int J STD AIDS. 2019 Jan;30(1):90–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462418792113
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McManus BA, Coleman DC, Moran G, Pinjon E, Diogo D, Bougnoux ME, Borecká-Melkusova S, Bujdákova H, Murphy P, d’Enfert C, et al. Multilocus sequence typing reveals that the population structure of Candida dubliniensis is significantly less divergent than that of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Feb;46(2):652–664. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01574-07
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mohammadi F, Hemmat N, Bajalan Z, Javadi A. Analysis of biofilm-related genes and antifungal susceptibility pattern of vaginal Candida albicans and non-Candida albicans species. Biomed Res Int. 2021 May;2021:5598907. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5598907
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moran GP, Coleman DC, Sullivan DJ. Candida albicans versus Candida dubliniensis: why is C. albicans more pathogenic? Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:205921. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/205921
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mucci MJ, Cuestas ML, Landanburu MF, Mujica MT. Prevalence of Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana in pregnant women suffering from vulvovaginal candidiasis in Argentina. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2017 Apr–Jun;34(2):72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2016.09.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Naeimi B, Mirhendi H, Khamisipour G, Sadeghzadeh F, Ahmadi B. Candida africana in recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) patients: frequency and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. J Med Microbiol. 2018 Nov;67(11):1601–1607. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000834
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neppelenbroek KH, Seó RS, Urban VM, Silva S, Dovigo LN, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques. Oral Dis. 2014 May;20(4):329–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12123
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pakshir K, Bordbar M, Zomorodian K, Nouraei H, Khodadadi H. Evaluation of CAMP-like effect, biofilm formation, and discrimination of Candida africana from vaginal Candida albicans species. J Pathog. 2017;2017:7126258. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7126258
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pfaller MA, Andes DR, Diekema DJ, Horn DL, Reboli AC, Rotstein C, Franks B, Azie NE. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans species of Candida in 2,496 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) registry 2004–2008. PLoS One. 2014 Jul;9(7):e101510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101510
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romeo O, Criseo G. First molecular method for discriminating between Candida africana, Candida albicans, and Candida dubliniensis by using hwp1 gene. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Oct; 62(2):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.05.014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romeo O, Criseo G. Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans and its closely related yeasts Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan;47(1):212–214. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01540-08
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scharmann U, Kirchhoff L, Chapot VLS, Dziobaka J, Verhasselt HL, Stauf R, Buer J, Steinmann J, Rath PM. Comparison of four commercially available chromogenic media to identify Candida albicans and other medically relevant Candida species. Mycoses. 2020 Aug; 63(8):823–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13119
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shan Y, Fan S, Liu X, Li J. Prevalence of Candida albicans-closely related yeasts, Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis, in vulvovaginal candidiasis. Med Mycol. 2014 Aug;52(6):636–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myu003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shokoohi G, Javidnia J, Mirhendi H, Rasekh-Jahromi A, Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Ansari S, Maryami F, Goodarzi S, Romeo O. Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana isolated from vulvovaginal candidiasis: a single-centre experience in Iran. Mycoses. 2021 Jul;64(7):771–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13280
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sobel JD, Sobel R. Current treatment options for vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by azole-resistant Candida species. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Jun;19(9):971–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2018.1476490
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sobel JD. Pathogenesis and treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;14(Suppl 1):S148–S153. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_1.s148
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sullivan DJ, Moran GP, Pinjon E, Al-Mosaid A, Stokes C, Vaughan C, Coleman DC. Comparison of the epidemiology, drug resistance mechanisms, and virulence of Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 Jan;4(4–5):369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00240-X
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sullivan DJ, Westerneng TJ, Haynes KA, Bennett DE, Coleman DC. Candida dubliniensis sp. nov.: phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology (Reading). 1995 Jul; 141(7): 1507–1521. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-141-7-1507
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sustr V, Foessleitner P, Kiss H, Farr A. Vulvovaginal candidosis: current concepts, challenges and perspectives. J Fungi. 2020 Nov; 6(4):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040267
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Theill L, Dudiuk C, Morano S, Gamarra S, Nardin ME, Méndez E, Garcia-Effron G. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans and its related species Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana isolated from vulvovaginal samples in a hospital of Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2016 Jan–Mar;48(1):43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2015.10.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tietz HJ, Hopp M, Schmalreck A, Sterry W, Czaika V. Candida africana sp. nov., a new human pathogen or a variant of Candida albicans? Mycoses. 2001 Dec;44(11–12):437–445. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.2001.00707.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vidotto V, Mantoan B, Pugliese A, Pontón J, Quindós G, Aoki S, Ito-Kuwa S. Adherence of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis to buccal and vaginal cells. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2003 Jun; 20(2):52–54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wójkowska-Mach J, Pomorska-Wesołowska M, Romanik M, Romaniszyn D. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of microorganisms associated with lower reproductive tract infections in women from Southern Poland – retrospective laboratory-based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan;18(1):335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010335
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, Reno H, Zenilman JM, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul;70(4):1–187. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yazdanpanah A, Khaithir TM. Issues in identifying germ tube positive yeasts by conventional methods. J Clin Lab Anal. 2014 Jan; 28(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21635
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zangl I, Pap IJ, Aspöck C, Schüller C. The role of Lactobacillus species in the control of Candida via biotrophic interactions. Microb Cell. 2019 Nov;7(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2020.01.702
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Prevalence of Closely Related Candida albicans Species among Patients with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Southern Poland Based on the hwp1 Gene Amplification

Abstract

Paradigm

My account