Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fluconazole susceptibility of different Candida spp_
| Candida species | Fluconazole susceptibility n (%) | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC range (μg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | R | ||||
| Candida albicans (n = 18) | 12 (66.7%) | 6 (33.3%) | 16 | 1024 | 1–1024 |
| Non-albicans Candida isolates (n = 10) | 4 (40%) | 6 (60%) | 128 | 1024 | 8–1024 |
| Candida glabrata (n = 7) | 4 (57.1%) a | 3 (42.9%) | 32 | 1024 | 8–1024 |
| Candida tropicalis (n = 2) | 0 (0%) a | 2 (100%) | 128 b | ND c | ND |
| Candida famata (n = 1) | 0 (0%) a | 1 (100%) | ND | ND | ND |
Resistance-modulating effect of amikacin (4000 μg/ml) on fluconazole-resistant Candida clinical isolates_
| Isolate code | Candida species | MIC of fluconazole alone (μg/ml) | MIC of fluconazole (μg/ml) in the presence of amikacin | Modulation factor (MF) a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C. tropicalis | 128 | 4 | 32 |
| C6 | C. albicans | 1024 | 4 | 256 |
| C7 | C. tropicalis | 128 | 4 | 32 |
| C8 | C. glabrata | 1024 | 32 | 32 |
| C9 | C. glabrata | 1024 | 32 | 32 |
| C14 | C. albicans | 256 | 4 | 64 |
| C17 | C. albicans | 1024 | 4 | 256 |
| C20 | C. albicans | 1024 | 4 | 256 |
| C21 | C. albicans | 1024 | 4 | 256 |
| C23 | C. albicans | 1024 | 4 | 256 |
| C26 | C. glabrata | 256 | 256 | 1 |
| C28 | C. famata | 128 | 4 | 32 |
Identification, virulence determinants, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fluconazole against the Candida spp_ isolates tested_
| Isolate code | Candida species | Virulence determinants | MIC of Fluconazole (μg/ml) c | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biofilm formation | Proteases production Pz value a | Phospholipase production Pz value b | |||
| C1 | C. tropicalis | Strong | 0.26 | 0.33 | 128 |
| C2 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.4 | 0.48 | 16 |
| C3 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.16 | 0.29 | 8 |
| C4 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.19 | 0.29 | 32 |
| C5 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.2 | 1 | 8 |
| C6 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1024 |
| C7 | C. tropicalis | Strong | 0.22 | 0.23 | 128 |
| C8 | C. glabrata | Weak | 0.18 | 0.21 | 1024 |
| C9 | C. glabrata | Weak | 0.67 | 0.22 | 1024 |
| C10 | C. glabrata | Moderate | 0.5 | 0.2 | 32 |
| C11 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.26 | 0.26 | 16 |
| C12 | C. glabrata | Moderate | 0.43 | 0.23 | 32 |
| C13 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.4 | 0.2 | 8 |
| C14 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.26 | 0.3 | 256 |
| C15 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.24 | 0.24 | 16 |
| C16 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.24 | 0.24 | 8 |
| C17 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.15 | 0.27 | 1024 |
| C18 | C. glabrata | Moderate | 0.25 | 0.21 | 8 |
| C19 | C. albicans | Weak | 0.15 | 0.67 | 2 |
| C20 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.14 | 0.31 | 1024 |
| C21 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.17 | 0.4 | 1024 |
| C22 | C. albicans | Weak | 0.15 | 0.39 | 1 |
| C23 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.18 | 0.32 | 1024 |
| C24 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.17 | 0.41 | 8 |
| C25 | C. glabrata | Weak | 0.17 | 0.23 | 8 |
| C26 | C. glabrata | Moderate | 0.2 | 0.16 | 256 |
| C27 | C. albicans | Strong | 0.16 | 0.32 | 16 |
| C28 | C. famata | Strong | 0.16 | 0.4 | 128 |
Demographic profile of candiduric patients_
| Demographic variables | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Age group (years) | |||||||||||
| Male | Female | 30–40 | 41–50 | 51–60 | 61– > 70 | |||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Candida albicans (n = 18) | 11 | 61.1 | 7 | 38.9 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 33.3 | 1 | 5.6 | 11 | 61.1 |
| Non-albicans Candida isolates (n = 10) | 5 | 50 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 50 |
| Total (n = 28) | 16 | 57.1 | 12 | 42.9 | 1 | 3.6 | 9 | 32.1 | 2 | 7.1 | 16 | 57.1 |
Sequences of primers for the genes selected for transcript analysis using quantitative RT-PCR_
| Gene | Orientation | Sequence (5′–3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACT1 | F | TTGGTGATGAAGCCCAATCC | Chau et al. 2004 |
| R | CATATCGTCCCAGTTGGAAACA | ||
| MDR1 | F | TTACCTGAAACTTTTGGCAAAACA | Chau et al. 2004 |
| R | ACTTGTGATTCTGTCGTTACCG | ||
| CDR1 | F | TTTAGCCAGAACTTTCACTCATGATT | Chau et al. 2004 |
| R | TATTTATTTCTTCATGTTCATATGGATTGA | ||
| CDR2 | F | GGTATTGGCTGGTCCTAATGTGA | Chau et al. 2004 |
| R | GCTTGAATCAAATAAGTGAATGGATTAC |