Cyborgs, Neuroweapons, and Network Command
References
- Army Capabilities Integration Center – Future Warfare Division. (2018). Operationalizing Robotic and Autonomous Systems in Support of Multi-Domain Operations [White Paper ]. Retrieved 10.03.2020 from
https://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-RoboticAutonomousMultiDomainOps.pdf - Benanti, P. (2015).
Between Neuroskepticism and Neurogullibility: The Key Role of Neuroethics in the Regulation and Mitigation of Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 217–225). Boca Raton: CRC Press. - Boyd, J. R. (1995). The Essence of Winning and Losing. Retrieved 24.06.2020 from
https://web.archive.org/web/20110324054054/http:/www.danford.net/boyd/essence.htm - Chen, J. (2019). Neural Network - Investopedia homepage. Retrieved 14.04.2020 from
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neuralnetwork.asp - Crootof, R. (2015).
The Varied Law of Autonomous Weapon Systems . In A. P. Williams & P. Scharre (Eds.), Autonomous Systems: Issues for Defence Policymakers (pp. 98–126). Norfolk, Virginia: Allied Command Transformation (ACT). - Emondi, A. (2019). Six Paths to the Nonsurgical Future of Brain-Machine Interfaces – DARPA homepage. Retrieved 31.03.2020 from
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-05-20 - Emondi, A. (2020). Next Generation Non-Surgical Neurotechnology – DARPA homepage. Retrieved 31.03.2020 from
https://www.darpa.mil/program/next-generation-nonsurgical-neurotechnology - Farwell, J. P. (2015).
Issues of Law Raised by Development and Use of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 133–165). Boca Raton: CRC Press. - Giordano, J. (2015).
Neurotechnology, Global Relations, and National Security: Shifting Contexts and Neuroethical Demands . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 1–10). Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b17454-2 - Horowitz, M. C., & Scharre, P. (2015). Meaningful Human Control in Weapon Systems: A Primer. Project on Ethical Autonomy No. 1. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security. Retrieved from
https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/189786/Ethical_Autonomy_Working_Paper_031315.pdf - King, A. (2019). Command – The Twenty-First-Century General. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108642941
- Kline, N. S., & Clynes, M. E. (1961).
Drugs, Space, and Cybernetics: Evolution to Cyborgs . In B. E. Flaherty (Ed.), Psychophysiological aspects of space flight (pp. 345–371). New York: Columbia University Press. - Krishnan, A. (2016). Military Neuroscience and the Coming Age of Neurowarfare. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315595429
- Mann, S. (1997). Wearable Computing: A first step toward personal imaging. IEEE Computer, 30(2), 25–32. DOI: 10.1109/2.566147
- Marks, J. H. (2015).
Neuroskepticism: Rethinking the Ethics of Neuroscience and National Security . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 179–198). Boca Raton: CRC Press. - McCreight, R. (2015).
Brain Brinkmanship: Devising Neuroweapons Looking at Battlespace, Doctrine and Strategy . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 115–132). Boca Raton: CRC Press. - Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2020). Definition of Weapon. Retrieved 22.06.2020 from
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/weapon - Murray, S., & Yanagi, M. A. (2015).
Transitioning Brain Research: From Bench to Battlefield . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 11–22). Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b17454-3 - National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. (2008). Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/12177
- NATO. (2017). Strategic Foresight Analysis. Retrieved from
https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/doclibrary/171004_sfa_2017_report_hr.pdf - NATO Science and Technology Organization. (2020). Science and Technology Trends 2020–2040: Exploring the S&T Edge. NATO Headquarters, Brussels.
- Nørgaard, K. (2017). A Study of Military Technopolitics: The Controversy of Autonomous Weapon Systems. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Defence College. Retrieved from
https://pure.fak.dk/files/7137147/A_Study_of_Military_Technopolitics_NET.pdf - Oie, K. S., & McDowell, K. (2015).
Neurocognitive Engineering for Systems’ Development . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 33–50). Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b17454-5 - Sand, I. J. (2012).
Hybridization, Change and the Expansion of Law . In N. Å. Andersen & I. J. Sand (Eds.), Hybrid Forms of Governance: Self-suspension of Power (pp. 186–204). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230363007_11 - Scharre, P. (2018). Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
- Schmorrow, D. D., & Kruse, A. A. (2004).
Augmented Cognition . In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 54–59). Great Barrington, Massachusetts: Berkshire Publishing Group. - Sharkey, N. (2008). Cassandra or False Prophet of Doom: AI Robots and War. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(4), 14–17. DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2008.60
- Skinner, A., Russo, C., Baraniecki, L., & Maloof, M. (2014).
Ubiquitous Augmented Cognition . In D. D. Schmorrow & C. M. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Advancing Human Performance and Decision-Making through Adaptive Systems (pp. 67–77). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07527-3_7 - Stanney, K. M., Hale, K. S., Fuchs, S., Carpenter, A. B., & Berka, C. (2015).
Neural Systems in Intelligence and Training Applications . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (ed.) (pp. 23–32). Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b17454-4 - Teubner, G. (2004). Coincidentia Oppositorium: Hybrid Networks Beyond Contract and Organization. Storrs Lectures 2003/4, Yale Law School.
- Tonin, M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Implications for NATO’s Armed Forces. NATO Science and Technology Committee, Sub-Committee on Technology Trends and Security (STCTTS). Retrieved from
https://www.nato-pa.int/download-file?filename=sites/default/files/2019-10/REPORT%20149%20STCTTS%2019%20E%20rev.%201%20fin-%20ARTIFICIAL%20INTELLIGENCE.pdf - van Gerven, M., Farquhar, J., Scaefer, R., Vlek, R., Geuze, J., Nijholt, A., Ramsey, N., Haselager, P., Vuurpijl, L., Gielen, S., & Desain, P. (2009). The brain-computer interface cycle. Journal of Neural Engineering, 6(4), 1–10. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/041001
- Verbeek, P. (2009).
Moralizing Technology: on the morality of technical artifacts and their design . In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Technology (pp. 226–243). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield - Wurzman, R., & Giordano, J. (2015).
’NEURINT’ and Neuroweapons: Neurotechnologies in National Intelligence and Defense . In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns (pp. 79–113). Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/b17454
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.86 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 94 - 107
Submitted on: Jun 29, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 12, 2020
Published on: Feb 18, 2021
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
© 2021 Katrine Nørgaard, Michael Linden-Vørnle, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.