Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Research Is Not a Prompt: Introducing SJMS’s Policy on Generative AI Cover

Research Is Not a Prompt: Introducing SJMS’s Policy on Generative AI

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity—ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
  2. Andersen, R. (2026, January 22). Science Is Drowning in AI Slop. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/2026/01/ai-slop-science-publishing/685704/
  3. Chen, C., & Jia, X. (2026). When researchers use AI: Public trust, ethical judgments, and the perceived value of academic research. AI and Ethics, 6(2), 223. 10.1007/s43681-026-01039-w
  4. Engzell, P., & Wilmers, N. (2026). The Paper Factory (24xfq_v1). SocArXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/24xfq_v1/
  5. Gartenberg, C., Hasan, S., Murray, A., & Pierce, L. (2026). More Versus Better: Artificial Intelligence, Incentives, and the Emerging Crisis in Peer Review. Organization Science, 37(3), 795–812. 10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3
  6. Goddard, K., Roudsari, A., & Wyatt, J. C. (2012). Automation bias: A systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(1), 121–127. 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089
  7. Hedžet, A., & Leese, M. (2025). AI and academic publishing. Journal of International Relations and Development, 28(3), 237–240. 10.1057/s41268-025-00361-w
  8. Horowitz, M. C., & Kahn, L. (2024). Bending the Automation Bias Curve: A Study of Human and AI-Based Decision Making in National Security Contexts. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae020. 10.1093/isq/sqae020
  9. Hunter, C., & Bowen, B. E. (2024). We’ll never have a model of an AI major-general: Artificial Intelligence, command decisions, and kitsch visions of war. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(1), 116–146. 10.1080/01402390.2023.2241648
  10. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2026). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
  11. Jowsey, T., Braun, V., Clarke, V., Lupton, D., & Fine, M. (2025). We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10778004251401851. 10.1177/10778004251401851
  12. King, A. (2025). AI, Automation, and War. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691265148/ai-automation-and-war
  13. Kwik, J. (2025). Digital Yes-Men: How to Deal With Sycophantic Military AI? Global Policy, 16(3), 467–473. 10.1111/1758-5899.70042
  14. Larson, B. Z., Moser, C., Caza, A., Muehlfeld, K., & Colombo, L. A. (2024). From the Editors: Critical Thinking in the Age of Generative AI. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(3), 373–378 (179623256). 10.5465/amle.2024.0338
  15. Nguyen, D. C., & Welch, C. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Data Analysis: Analyzing—Or Just Chatting? Organizational Research Methods, 29(1), 3–39. 10.1177/10944281251377154
  16. Roberson, Q. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Responsible Research at AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 69(2), 207–211. 10.5465/amj.2026.4002
  17. Schwarz, J. (2025). The use of generative AI in statistical data analysis and its impact on teaching statistics at universities of applied sciences. Teaching Statistics, 47(2), 118–128. 10.1111/test.12398
  18. SJMS. (2026). The Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies. https://sjms.nu/about/editorialpolicies#ai-policy
  19. Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., & Burdick, M. (1999). Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(5), 991–1006. 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0252
  20. Sookermany, A. M., & Slensvik, T. (2026). Military Operational Thinking in an Age of Artificial Intelligence. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2026/03/military-operational-thinking-in-an-age-of-artificial-intelligence/
  21. The Associated Press. (2025, September 5). Anthropic to pay authors $1.5B to settle lawsuit over pirated chatbot training material. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2025/09/05/g-s1-87367/anthropic-authors-settlement-pirated-chatbot-training-material
  22. Turnbull, H. W. (1959). The correspondence of Isaac Newton: 1661–1675, Volume 1. https://archive.org/details/correspondenceof0001hwtu
  23. Vasankari, L., & Koski, A. (2025). GenAI in the Military: Trends and Opportunities. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 8(1). 10.31374/sjms.415
  24. Wiechert, K., Wang, J. C., & Chapman, J. R. (2024). When Will Peer-Review Become A.I.-Review? Global Spine Journal, 14(5), 1463–1463. 10.1177/21925682241242892
  25. Williams, T. (2025). Researchers ‘polarised’ over use of AI in peer review. Times Higher Education (THE). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/researchers-polarised-over-use-ai-peer-review
  26. Winberg, D., Tsai, E., Tang, T., Xuan, D., Marchi, N., & Shi, L. (2026). Can AI write your code? A case study of chatgpt’s statistical coding capabilities for quantitative research. Health Economics Review, 16, 17. 10.1186/s13561-025-00714-8
  27. Wood, N. G., Robbins, S., Zegarra Berodt, E., Graf von Westerholt, A., Behrndt, M., Budig, H., & Kloock-Schreiber, D. (2026). Stop Saying ‘AI’. Philosophy & Technology, 39(2), 106. 10.1007/s13347-026-01114-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.649 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 630 - 636
Submitted on: Jun 18, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 18, 2026
Published on: Oct 26, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Christoph Harig, Søren Sjøgren, Daniel Møller Ølgaard, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.