Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Designing Conventional Arms Control Agreements Cover

Designing Conventional Arms Control Agreements

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Acton, J. M. (2013, February 5). Reclaiming strategic stability. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2013/02/reclaiming-strategic-stability?lang=en
  2. Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. In Cooperation under anarchy (pp. 226254). Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv39x84c
  3. Bencsik, P. (2021). After Trianon: Life near the Hungarian–Czechoslovak border during the 1920s. Chronica, 20, 4763.
  4. Blagden, D. (2021). When does competition become conflict? Technology, geography, and the offense–defense balance. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(4), 123. 10.1093/jogss/ogab007
  5. Brodie, B. (1976). On the objectives of arms control. International Security, 1(1), 1736. 10.2307/2538574
  6. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781526485656
  7. Burns, R. D., & Urquidi, D. (1968a). Disarmament in perspective: Vol. 2. Demilitarization of frontiers, islands and straits. California State College at Los Angeles Foundation.
  8. Burns, R. D., & Urquidi, D. (1968b). Disarmament in perspective: Vol. 4. Conclusions. California State College at Los Angeles Foundation.
  9. Cameron, J. (2022). Soviet-American strategic arms limitation and the limits of co-operative competition. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 33(1), 111132. 10.1080/09592296.2022.2041812
  10. Campbell, D. T. (1975). “Degrees of freedom” and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 178193. 10.1177/001041407500800204
  11. Chillaud, M. (2006). Territorial disarmament in Northern Europe: The epilogue of a success story? (SIPRI Policy Paper No. 13). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
  12. CitizensInformation.ie. (2022, August 19). The Good Friday Agreement. https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government-in-ireland/ireland-and-the-uk/good-friday-agreement/
  13. Collier, D. (2013). Within-case versus cross-case causal analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400845446-008
  14. Delaney Edge. (2021, December 14). The role of cost-benefit analysis in public policy decision-making. Berkeley Public Policy Journal. https://bppj.studentorg.berkeley.edu/2021/12/14/the-role-of-cost-benefit-analysis-in-public-policy-decision-making/
  15. Dyke, J. M. V. (2005). An analysis of the Aegean disputes under international law. Ocean Development & International Law, 36(1), 63117. 10.1080/00908320590909088
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532550.
  17. Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269305. 10.1162/002081898753162820
  18. Féron, É. (2014). Prisoners of history? British-Irish relations and the conflict in Northern Ireland. ERIS – European Review of International Studies, 1(3), 94109. 10.3224/eris.v1i3.19126
  19. Filson, D., & Werner, S. (2002). A bargaining model of war and peace: Anticipating the onset, duration, and outcome of war. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 819837. 10.2307/3088436
  20. Freedman, L. (1991). Arms control: Thirty years on. Daedalus, 120(1), 6982.
  21. Garfinkel, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). How does the offense-defense balance scale? Journal of Strategic Studies, 42(6), 736763. 10.1080/01402390.2019.1631810
  22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. 10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
  23. Glaser, C. L. (1992). Political consequences of military strategy: Expanding and refining the spiral and deterrence models. World Politics, 44(4), 497538. 10.2307/2010486
  24. Goldfischer, D. (2020). The meaning of offense and defense. In The best defense. Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501736681-004
  25. Goldstone, J. A. (2003). Comparative historical analysis and knowledge accumulation in the study of revolutions. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (1st ed., pp. 4190). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803963.003
  26. Graef, A. (2021). Beyond stability: The politics of conventional arms control in Europe. Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, 10(2), 219245. 10.1007/s42597-022-00070-y
  27. Greig, J. M., & Enterline, A. J. (2021). Correlates of War database, National Material Capabilities (Version 6.0) [Data set]. University of North Texas.
  28. Hausken, K. (2016). Cost benefit analysis of war. International Journal of Conflict Management, 27(4), 454469. 10.1108/IJCMA-04-2015-0023
  29. Hirschon, R. (2003). Crossing the Aegean: An appraisal of the 1923 compulsory population exchange between Greece and Turkey (Studies in Forced Migration Vol. 12). Berghahn Books. 10.2307/j.ctt1x76f3x
  30. Hogg, W. (2004). Controlling weapons in turbulent times: Canada and the future of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 59(2), 325346. 10.1177/002070200405900205
  31. Hu, D., Cooper, A., Desai, N., Guo, S., Shi, S., & Banks, D. (2019). Cost-benefit analysis of discretionary wars. Statistics and Public Policy, 6(1), 98106. 10.1080/2330443X.2019.1688740
  32. Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167214. 10.2307/2009958
  33. Jervis, R. (1982). Security regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 357378. 10.1017/S0020818300018981
  34. Jervis, R. (1991). Arms control, stability, and causes of war. Daedalus, 120(1), 167181.
  35. Johnson, D., Mayne, R., & Tombs, R. (2004). Cross channel currents: 100 years of the Entente Cordiale. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203624586
  36. Kaplow, J. M., & Gartzke, E. (2021). The determinants of uncertainty in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 65(2), 306319. 10.1093/isq/sqab004
  37. Koivurova, T., & Holiencin, F. (2017). Demilitarisation and neutralisation of Svalbard: How has the Svalbard regime been able to meet the changing security realities during almost 100 years of existence? Polar Record, 53(2), 131142. 10.1017/S0032247416000838
  38. Kokoshin, A. (2011). Ensuring strategic stability in the past and present: Theoretical and applied questions. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
  39. Kreps, S. E. (2018). The institutional design of arms control agreements. Foreign Policy Analysis, 14(1), 127147. 10.1093/fpa/orw045
  40. Kühn, U. (2020). The rise and fall of cooperative arms control in Europe (1st ed.). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. 10.5771/9783748903239
  41. Lachowski, Z. (2010). Half-century of arms control: A tentative score sheet. Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 19(4), 4065.
  42. Larsen, J. A. (Ed.). (2002). Arms control: Cooperative security in a changing environment. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 10.1515/9781685853983
  43. Layton, S. (2014). Reframing European security: Russia’s proposal for a new European security architecture. International Relations, 28(1), 2545. 10.1177/0047117813507734
  44. Leah, C., & Lowther, A. B. (2017). Conventional arms and nuclear peace. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 11(1), 1424.
  45. Levy, J. S. (1996). Loss aversion, framing, and bargaining: The implications of prospect theory for international conflict. International Political Science Review, 17(2), 179195. 10.1177/019251296017002004
  46. Lieber, K. A. (2000). Grasping the technological peace: The offense-defense balance and international security. International Security, 25(1), 71104. 10.1162/016228800560390
  47. Ligita, T., Nurjannah, I., Wicking, K., Harvey, N., & Francis, K. (2022). From textual to visual: The use of concept mapping as an analytical tool in a grounded theory study. Qualitative Research, 22(1), 126142. 10.1177/1468794120965362
  48. Lippert, W. (2024a, October 30). Conventional arms control and ending the Russo-Ukrainian War. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2024/10/conventional-arms-control-and-ending-the-russo-ukrainian-war/
  49. Lippert, W. (2024b). Delegation to treaty bodies and international organizations for conventional arms control agreements in Europe: A sum score evaluation. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 30(1), 93122. 10.1163/19426720-03001005
  50. Lippert, W. (2025). Conventional arms control in the Baltic Sea: A Montreux for the North. Bulletin of “Carol I” National Defence University, 14(1), 5273. 10.53477/2284-9378-25-04
  51. Lippert, W. E., & Becker, J. (2025). Conventional arms control and military balance in Europe. Contemporary Security Policy, 46(3), 641672. 10.1080/13523260.2025.2474873
  52. Lynn-Jones, S. (1995). Offense-defense theory and its critics. Security Studies, 4(4), 660691. 10.1080/09636419509347600
  53. Mahoney, J. (2004). Comparative-historical methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 81101. 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110507
  54. Mazarr, M. J., Charap, S., Casey, A., Demus, A., Frederick, B., Povlock, M., Priebe, M., & Radin, A. (2021). Stabilizing great-power rivalries. RAND Corporation. 10.7249/RR-A456-1
  55. Montgomery, E. B. (2006). Breaking out of the security dilemma: Realism, reassurance, and the problem of uncertainty. International Security, 31(2), 151185. 10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.151
  56. Morgan, F. E. (2012). Dancing with the bear: Managing escalation in a conflict with Russia. Security Studies Center/Institut français des relations internationales. http://www.ifri.org/?page=contribution-detail&id=7040&id_provenance=97
  57. Müller, T., & Albert, M. (2021). Whose balance? A constructivist approach to balance of power politics. European Journal of International Security, 6(1), 109128. 10.1017/eis.2020.19
  58. Mustonen-Ollila, E., Lehto, M., & Heikkonen, J. (2020). Components of defence strategies in society’s information environment: A case study based on the grounded theory. Security and Defence Quarterly, 28(1), 1943. 10.35467/sdq/118186
  59. Newsweek. (2024, September 13). JD Vance floats Donald Trump deal to end war in Ukraine. https://www.newsweek.com/jd-vance-floats-donald-trump-deal-end-russia-ukraine-war-1953302
  60. Papuççular, H. (2022). Contested sovereignties: Turkish diplomacy, the Straits Commission, and the League of Nations (1924–1936). Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 25(2), 207221. 10.1080/19448953.2022.2143773
  61. Pillar, P. R. (1983). Negotiating peace: War termination as a bargaining process (Vol. 695). Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt7ztnt0
  62. Posen, B. R. (1982). Inadvertent nuclear war? Escalation and NATO’s northern flank. International Security, 7(2), 2854. 10.2307/2538432
  63. Reiter, D. (2009). How wars end. Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt7pff4
  64. Reuters. (2022, September 14). As war began, Putin rejected a Ukraine peace deal recommended by aide. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/exclusive-war-began-putin-rejected-ukraine-peace-deal-recommended-by-his-aide-2022-09-14/
  65. Reuters. (2023, March 24). Russia wants demilitarised buffer zones in Ukraine, says Putin ally. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-wants-demilitarised-buffer-zones-ukraine-says-putin-ally-2023-03-24/
  66. Rizzo, C. J. (1997, May 22). The cost-benefit calculation model: Is it a useful tool to analyze war termination? [Monograph]. School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College.
  67. Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum. (1985, November 21). Joint Soviet-United States statement on the summit meeting in Geneva. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/joint-soviet-united-states-statement-summit-meeting-geneva
  68. Rotfeld, A. D. (2001). A future arms control agenda. In I. Anthony (Ed.), A future arms control agenda: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 118. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
  69. Rotkirch, H. (1986). The demilitarization and neutralization of the Åland Islands: A regime «in European interests» withstanding changing circumstances. Journal of Peace Research, 23(4), 357376. 10.1177/002234338602300405
  70. Russian Foreign Ministry. (2021, December 17). Agreement on measures to ensure the security of the Russian Federation and member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization [Draft proposal]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790803/?lang=en
  71. Schelling, T. C. (1975). A framework for the evaluation of arms-control proposals. Daedalus, 104(3), 187200.
  72. Schelling, T. C., & Halperin, M. H. (1961). Strategy and arms control. Twentieth Century Fund.
  73. Schmidt, H.-J. (2023). How the Russia–Ukraine war could end, and its impact on conventional arms control (IAI Papers 23/10). Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://doi.org/978-88-9368-290-9
  74. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004244
  75. Schofield, J. (2000). Arms control failure and the balance of power. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 747777.
  76. Seydi, S. (2010). The Turkish Straits and the Great Powers: From the Montreux Convention to the early Cold War, 1936–1947 (Analecta Isisiana: Ottoman and Turkish Studies). Gorgias Press. 10.31826/9781463225506
  77. Smith, K. B. (2002). Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Studies Journal, 30(3), 379395.
  78. Sommerer, T., & Tallberg, J. (2019). Diffusion across international organizations: Connectivity and convergence. International Organization, 73(2), 399433. 10.1017/S0020818318000450
  79. Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.). (2013). Making sense of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 10.1515/9781685850586
  80. Stone, J. (2012). Conventional deterrence and the challenge of credibility. Contemporary Security Policy, 33(1), 108123. 10.1080/13523260.2012.659591
  81. Taliaferro, J. W. (2012). Neoclassical realism and the study of regional order. In T. V. Paul (Ed.), International relations theory and regional transformation (1st ed., pp. 74103). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139096836.006
  82. The general framework agreement for peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Dayton Peace Agreement). (1995, December 14). https://www.osce.org/bih/126173
  83. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167186. 10.1177/0735275112457914
  84. Tir, J., & Diehl, P. F. (2002). Geographic dimensions of enduring rivalries. Political Geography, 21(2), 263286. 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00059-2
  85. Trachtenberg, M. (1991). The past and future of arms control. Daedalus, 120(1), 203216.
  86. Trotter, W. R. (2002). The winter war: The Russo-Finnish War of 1939–40. Aurum Press.
  87. Volkery, C. (2009, September 11). The Iron Lady’s views on German reunification: ‘The Germans are back!’ Der Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/the-iron-lady-s-views-on-german-reunification-the-germans-are-back-a-648364.html
  88. Vondracek, F. J. (1937). The foreign policy of Czechoslovakia: 19181935. Columbia University Press.
  89. Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 2946. 10.2307/1149275
  90. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
  91. Wilcox, M. R. (2020). The Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe and Russian foreign and security policy [Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University]. K-State Research Exchange.
  92. Williamson, R. L. Jr. (2003). Hard law, soft law, and non-law in multilateral arms control: Some compliance hypotheses. Chicago Journal of International Law, 4(1), 5982.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.352 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 191 - 209
Submitted on: Oct 18, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 27, 2026
Published on: Apr 6, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 William Lippert, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.