Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Odd Couples’ Win-Sets: Maintaining U.S. Basing Rights Through New Two-Level Game Negotiations With Greenland Cover

Odd Couples’ Win-Sets: Maintaining U.S. Basing Rights Through New Two-Level Game Negotiations With Greenland

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Ackrén, M. (2019). From bilateral to trilateral agreement: The case of the Thule Airbase. In M. Jakobsson (Ed.), Redefining Arctic Security: Arctic Yearbook 2019 (pp. 123134). Akureyri, Iceland: Arctic Portal.
  2. Archer, C. (1988). The United States Defence Areas in Greenland. Cooperation and Conflict, 23(3), 123144. DOI: 10.1177/001083678802300302
  3. Archer, C. (2003). Greenland, US bases and missile defence: New two-level negotiations? Cooperation and Conflict, 38(2), 125147. DOI: 10.1177/0010836703038002003
  4. Brady, A. M., & Thorhallsson, B. (Eds.). (2021). Small states and the new security environment. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4
  5. DR.TV (2020, July 22). Pompeo meets Langkilde [Interview]. Retrieved from https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/se-interviewet-pompeo-moedes-med-langkilde
  6. Dragsdahl, J. (2005). Denmark and Greenland: American defences and domestic agendas. Contemporary Security Policy, 26(3), 486504. DOI: 10.1080/13523260500500617
  7. Fannon, F. R., & Jensen, E. (2019). Memorandum of Understanding between Greenland’s Ministry of Mineral Resources and Labour and the US Department of State Concerning Cooperation on Mineral Resource Sector Development and Governance. Retrieved from URL: https://govmin.gl/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/MoU_Govt_of_Greenland_USA_2019.pdf
  8. Fannon, F. R., & Svane, J. (2019). Memorandum of Understanding between Greenland’s Ministry of Industry, Energy and Research and the US Department of State Concerning Cooperation on Energy Resource Sector Development and Governance.
  9. Folketinget. (1953). The Constitutional Act of Denmark. Translated version. Retrieved from the website of the Parliament of Denmark. Retrieved from URL: https://www.ft.dk/-/media/sites/ft/pdf/publikationer/engelske-publikationer-pdf/grundloven_samlet_2018_uk_web.ashx
  10. Frederiksen, M., Nielsen, B. S., & Egede, M. B. (2021). Kommissorium for Udenrigs-, Sikkerheds- og Forsvarspolitisk Kontaktudvalg mellem Danmarks regering, Færøernes landsstyre og Grønlands Naalakkersuisut. Retrieved from URL: https://www.stm.dk/media/10669/kommissorium-for-usfp-kontaktudvalg-underskrevet.pdf
  11. Gad, U. P. (2017). National identity politics and postcolonial sovereignty games – Greenland, Denmark, and the European Union. Copenhagen Museum Tusculanum Press.
  12. Government of Denmark. (2009). Act on Greenland Self-Government, Act no. 473 of 12 June 2009. Retrieved from URL: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/110442/137381/F-520745313/DNK110442%20Eng.pdf
  13. Government of the United States of America, Government of Denmark, Government of Greenland. (1991). Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Use of Sondrestrom Aviation Facility, Kulusuk Airfield and Other Matters Related to United States Military Activities in Greenland. Signed at Copenhagen on 13 March 1991, Denmark (Including Greenland) and the United States of America. Government of Denmark. Copenhagen. Retrieved September 1, 2022 from URL: https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/97618.pdf
  14. Government of the United States of America, Government of the Kingdom of Denmark, Government of Greenland. (2020). Statement on Improved Cooperation in Greenland – Including at Pituffik (Thule Air Base).
  15. Harhoff, F. (1993). Rigsfællesskabet [The Realm Community]. Klim.
  16. Inatsisartut. (2016). Betænkning afgivet af Udenrigs- og Sikkerhedspolitisk Udvalg c vedrørende ¨EM2016/65 og EM2016/90 og EM2016/93. Afgivet ved forslagenes 2. behandling. Rettelsesblad. 17. november 2016. J.nr. 01.30.03–00013. Inatsisartut. Retrieved from URL: https://inatsisartut.gl/media/gpjdxdm0/pkt65_90_93_em2016_65_em2015_bf33_pituffik_bet_2beh_rettblad_da.pdf [6 May 2024].
  17. Jacobsen, M. (2020). Greenland’s Arctic advantage: Articulations, acts and appearances of sovereignty games. Cooperation and Conflict, 55(2), 170192. DOI: 10.1177/0010836719882476
  18. Jacobsen, M., & Gad, U. P. (2017). Setting the scene in Nuuk: Introducing the cast of characters in Greenlandic foreign policy narratives. Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic (pp. 1127). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315162645-2
  19. Jacobsen, M., & Olsvig, S. (2024). From Peary to Pompeo: The history of United States’ securitizations of Greenland. M. Jacobsen, U. P. Gad, & O. Wæver (Eds.), Greenland in Arctic security: (de)securitization dynamics under climatic thaw and geopolitical freeze (pp. 107148). University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.12676130
  20. Kauffmann, H., & Hull, C. (1941). Agreement relating to the defense of Greenland. 55 Stat. 1245; Executive Agreement Series 204. Retrieved from URL: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/b-dk-ust000007-0107.pdf [6 October 2020].
  21. Kjærgaard, S. (2021). Dansk militær opbygning i Grønland og fastholdelse af arktisk lavspænding. Sikkerhedspolitik i Arktis og Nordatlanten (pp. 219237). Djøf Forlag.
  22. Kristensen, K. S. (2004). Greenland, Denmark and the debate on missile defense: A window of opportunity for increased autonomy. DIIS Working Paper, No. 2004:14. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). Retrieved from URL: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/84548
  23. Kristensen, K. S. (2005). Negotiating base rights for missile defence: the case of Thule Air Base in Greenland. In B. Heurlin & S. Rynning (Eds.), Missile defence. International, regional, and national implications (pp. 183208). Abingdon: Routledge Press.
  24. Kristensen, K. S., & Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2018). Greenlandic sovereignty in practice: Uranium, Independence and foreign relations in Greenland between three logics of security. In K.S. Kristensen and J. Rahbek-Clemmensen (Eds.), Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic: Postcolonial paradiplomacy between high and low politics pp. 3853. London: Routledge DOI: 10.4324/9781315162645
  25. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE Publications.
  26. Løwschall-Wedel, J. (2014, November 6). Dyrt at miste servicekontrakten i Pituffik. Retrieved from https://knr.gl/da/nyheder/dyrt-miste-servicekontrakten-i-pituffik [February 20, 2023].
  27. Møller, P. S., & Enoksen, H. (2003, May 14). Fælles principerklæring mellem Regeringen og Grønlands Landsstyre om Grønlands inddragelse i udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitikken (Joint Declaration between the Danish Government and the Greenland Home Rule Government on Greenland’s Involvement in Foreign and Security Policy). Itilleq.
  28. Mouritzen, H. (2007). Denmark’s super Atlanticism. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 5(2), 155167. DOI: 10.1080/14794019908656861
  29. Mouritzen, H. (2022). Grænser for handlefrihed: Skandinaviske stater i asymmetrisk bilateralt diplomati. Internasjonal Politikk, 80(1), 627. DOI: 10.23865/intpol.v80.3078
  30. Naalakkersuisut. (2015a). Finanslov for 2015 (EM 2015/14, Sagsnr. 2015 – 532, Dok.nr. 301919). Naalakkersuisut. Retrieved from URL: https://naalakkersuisut.gl/departementer/dep_for_finanser_og_ligestilling/finanslov?sc_lang=da [February 20, 2023].
  31. Naalakkersuisut. (2015b). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2015 (EM 2015/14, Sagsnr. 2015 – 3479, Dok.nr. 301919). Naalakkersuisut.
  32. Naalakkersuisut. (2016). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2016 (EM 2016/14, Sagsnr. 2016 – 16012, Journal nr. 09.37). Naalakkersuisut.
  33. Naalakkersuisut. (2017). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2017 (EM 2017/14, Sagsnr. 2016 – 2195). Naalakkersuisut.
  34. Naalakkersuisut. (2018). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2018 (EM 2018/14, Sags nr. 2018 – 2195). Naalakkersuisut.
  35. Naalakkersuisut. (2019). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2019 (EM 2019/14, Sagsnr. 2019 – 8961). Naalakkersuisut.
  36. Naalakkersuisut. (2020). Finanslov for 2021 (EM 2020/14). Naalakkersuisut. Retrieved from URL: https://naalakkersuisut.gl/departementer/dep_for_finanser_og_ligestilling/finanslov?sc_lang=da [February 20, 2023].
  37. Naalakkersuisut. (2021a). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2021 (EM 2021/14, Sagsnr. 2021 – 4757). Naalakkersuisut.
  38. Naalakkersuisut. (2021b). Forslag til: Inatsisartutlov om ændring af landstingslov om indkomstskat. Forelæggelsesnotat. (EM2021/17, AN – Sags.nr.: 2020 – 23155). Naalakkersuisut. Retrieved from URL: https://inatsisartut.gl/media/lwwjccyl/pkt17_em2021_indkomstskat_fn_1beh_da.pdf [6 May 2024].
  39. Naalakkersuisut. (2022). Udenrigspolitisk Redegørelse 2022 (EM2022/14). Naalakkersuisut. Retrieved from URL: https://ina.gl/dvd/EM%202022/pdf/media/2553525/pkt14_em2022_udenrigspolitisk_redegoerelse_2022_da.pdf [January 8, 2023].
  40. Nielsen, A. P. (2021). Kampen om flåden–kystvagt eller krig i farvandene omkring Grønland. In Sikkerhedspolitik i Arktis og Nordatlanten (pp. 239262). Djøf Forlag.
  41. Olesen, M. R. (2017). Lightning rod: U.S., Greenlandic and Danish relations in the shadow of postcolonial reputations. In Greenland and the International Politics of a Changing Arctic (pp. 7082). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315162645-6
  42. Olesen, M. R. (2020). The end of Arctic exceptionalism? A review of the academic debates and what the Arctic prospects mean for the Kingdom of Denmark. Danish Foreign Policy Review, 103122.
  43. Olsvig, S., & Gad, U. P. (2021). Greenland obviously has its own defense policy. DIIS Policy Brief November 2021. Danish Institute for International Studies. Copenhagen.
  44. Olsvig, S. (2022a). “‘Uagununa Nunarput’ (‘it’s Our Country’). Greenland’s aim to move from trilateralism with Denmark and the US, to US–Greenlandic Bilateralism.” In K. Fischer and H. Mouritzen (Eds.). Danish Foreign Policy Review 2022, Danish Institute for International Studies. Copenhagen. 74106.
  45. Olsvig, S. (2022b). Greenland’s ambiguous action space: Testing internal and external limitations between US and Danish Arctic interests. The Polar Journal, 12(2), 215239. DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2022.2137085
  46. Petersen, N. (1998). Negotiating the 1951 Greenland Defense Agreement: Theoretical and empirical aspects. In Scandinavian Political Studies, 21(1), 128. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1998.tb00001.x
  47. Petersen, N. (2005). Danmark som international aktør 705–2005. Politica, 37(1), 4459. DOI: 10.7146/politica.v37i1.69873
  48. Petersen, N. (2011). SAC at Thule – Greenland in the U.S. Polar Strategy. Journal of Cold War Studies, 13(2), 90115. DOI: 10.1162/JCWS_a_00138
  49. Powell, C. L., Møller, P. S., & Motzfeldt, J. (2004). Agreement between the United States of America and Denmark. Amending and Supplementing the Agreement of April 27, 1951. Signed at Igaliku, 6 August, 2004. Treaties and other international acts series 04–806. Retrieved from URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/04-806-Denmark-Defense.done_.pdf [12 November 2020].
  50. Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427460. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
  51. Radford, A. (1955). Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense. Department of Defense, 21 January 1955. Retrieved from URL: https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/research/online-documents/declassified/fy-2011/1955-01-21.pdf [January 8, 2023].
  52. Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., & Henriksen, A. (2017). Grønlandskortet: Arktis’ Betydning for Danmarks Indflydelse i USA. Report, Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen. Retrieved from URL: https://cms.polsci.ku.dk/publikationer/groenlandskortet/CMS_Rapport_2017_Gr_nlandskortet.pdf [March 1, 2023].
  53. Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2017). The Arctic turn: How did the High North become a foreign and security policy priority for Denmark? In Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic (pp. 5469). Routledge.
  54. Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2020). Denmark and Greenland’s changing sovereignty and security challenges in the Arctic. In Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security (pp. 176187). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315265797-15
  55. Rasmussen, R. K., & Merkelsen, H. (2017). Post-colonial governance through securitization? A narratological analysis of a securitization controversy in contemporary Danish and Greenlandic uranium policy. Politik, 20(3), 83103. DOI: 10.7146/politik.v20i3.97183
  56. Salama, V., Ballhaus, R., & Restuccia, A. (2019, August 16). President Trump Eyes a New Real-Estate Purchase: Greenland. The Wall Street Journal. URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-eyes-a-new-real-estate-purchase-greenland-11565904223 [November 26, 2020].
  57. Sands, C., & Kielsen, K. (2020). Common Plan for US-Greenland Cooperation in Support of Our Understanding for Pituffik (Thule Air Base). Retrieved from URL: https://dk.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/95/Common-Plan-for-U.S.-Greenland-Cooperation-1.pdf [January 8, 2023].
  58. Sejersen, F. (2024). Infrastructural (Re) configurations and Processes of (De) securitization. Greenland in Arctic Security: (De) securitization Dynamics under Climatic Thaw and Geopolitical Freeze. In M. Jacobsen, U. P. Gad, & O. Wæver (Eds.), Greenland in Arctic security: (de)securitization dynamics under climatic thaw and geopolitical freeze (pp. 253283). University of Michigan Press.
  59. Sørensen, C. T. N. (2018). China is in the Arctic to Stay as a Great Power: How China’s Increasingly Confident, Proactive & Sophisticated Arctic Diplomacy Plays into Kingdom of Denmark Tensions. Arctic Yearbook, 2018, 115.
  60. Sørensen, C. T. N. (2021). Kina i Arktis: Stormagtsambitioner og indenrigspolitiske prioriteter. In Sikkerhedspolitik i Arktis og Nordatlanten (pp. 6385). Djøf Forlag.
  61. Spiermann, O. (2007). Danmarks Rige i forfatningsretlig belysning. København, Jurist- og Økonomforbundet. Sørensen, C. T. (2017). Chinese investments in Greenland: Promises and risks as seen from Nuuk, Copenhagen and Beijing. In Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic (pp. 8397). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315162645-7
  62. Spiermann, O. (2015). Redegørelse om Grønlands selvstyres deltagelse i behandlingen af sagen om udbud af basekontrakten vedrørende Pituffik. Edited Version. Copenhagen. Bruun & Hjejle Law Firm.
  63. Thorhallsson, B., Steinsson, S., & Kristinsson, T. (2018). A theory of shelter: Iceland’s American period (1941–2006). Scandinavian Journal of History, 43(4), 539563. DOI: 10.1080/03468755.2018.1467078
  64. Unites States of American and the Kingdom of Denmark. (1951). Defense of Greenland: Agreement Between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, April 27, 1951. American Foreign Policy 1950–1955 Basic Documents Volumes I and II, Department of State Publication 6446, General Foreign Policy Series 117 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1957. URL: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/den001.asp#1 [9 November 2021].
  65. U.S. Embassy and Consulate in the Kingdom of Denmark. (2021). Restarting of the US-Greenland Joint Committee Meetings, 15 September 2021. Press release retrieved from URL: https://dk.usembassy.gov/restarting-of-the-u-s-greenland-jointcommittee-meetings-september-15-2021/ [September 1, 2023].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.208 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 110
Submitted on: Apr 27, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 17, 2024
Published on: Jun 14, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Sara Olsvig, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.