Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Denmark’s Offensive Cyber Capabilities: Questionable Assets for Prestige, New Risks of Entrapment Cover

Denmark’s Offensive Cyber Capabilities: Questionable Assets for Prestige, New Risks of Entrapment

Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Antonsen, T. (2018). Danish Leopards in Helmand: From the crew’s perspective. Trackpad Publishing.
  2. Atkeson, E. B. (2009). NATO Intelligence: A contradiction in Terms (redacted, unclassified 2009 version). Studies in Intelligence, 53(1): 111.
  3. Axe, D. (2021). American Bombers Blaze Toward Russia In Provocative Show Of Force. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2021/03/04/american-bombers-blaze-toward-russia-in-provocative-show-of-force/.
  4. Berlingske. (2013, August 27). Helle Thorning-Schmidt støtter indgreb i Syrien. Berlingske. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/225579.
  5. Binnendijk, A., & Priebe, M. (2019). An Attack Against Them All? Drivers of Decisions to Contribute to NATO Collective Defense. RAND Corporation. DOI: 10.7249/RR2964
  6. Blatchford, A., Hendeland, J., & Cerelus, L. (2020, December 2). How Biden could galvanize the world against Huawei. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/how-joe-biden-could-galvanize-the-world-against-huawei/.
  7. Bramsen, T. (2021). Et styrket dansk cyberforsvar. Forsvarsministeriet. https://fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/nyheder/2021/-et-styrket-dansk-cyberforsvar-2021-ua-.pdf.
  8. Branner, H. (2013). Denmark Between Venus and Mars: How Great a Change in Danish Foreign Policy? Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook, 134166.
  9. Bredsdorff, M. (2017, October 11). Nu er det officielt: Forsvarsministeriets F35-køb hviler på super-optimisme. Ingeniøren. https://ing.dk/artikel/nu-officielt-forsvarsministeriets-f35-koeb-hviler-paa-super-optimisme-207062.
  10. Breinstrup, T. (2020, June 8). Forsvarsminister: Nej til 5G-udstyr fra ikke-allierede lande. Berlingske.dk. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/1481355.
  11. Breuer, P. (2020, October 23). Interview via Skype 23. Oct. 2020 with Dr. Pablo Breuer by Major M. Storm Jensen (M. S. Jensen, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
  12. Burgess, M. (2019). Director-General ASD speech to the Lowy Institute | ASD Australian Signals Directorate. Australian Signals Directorate. https://www.asd.gov.au/publications/director-general-asd-speech-lowy-institute.
  13. Burkhart, D., & Woody, A. (2017). Strategic Competition: Beyond Peace and War. JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly, 86, 2027.
  14. Cenciotti. (2021, February 26). ‘Arctic Bone’: U.S. B-1 Bombers Fly First Mission From Norway Over Eastern Barents Sea, ‘Russia’s Naval Backyard’. The Aviationist. https://theaviationist.com/2021/02/26/arctic-bone-u-s-b-1-bombers-fly-first-mission-from-norway-over-easter-barents-sea-russias-naval-backyard/.
  15. Clausewitz, C. von. (1918). On War, Vol. 1. (J. J. Graham, Trans.). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & C. https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/2050/Clausewitz_1380-01_EBk_v6.0.pdf.
  16. Congressional Research Service. (2020). F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program (ver. 79 27 MAY 2020). Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL30563/79.
  17. Crowley, M. (2020, September 3). Allies and Former U.S. Officials Fear Trump Could Seek NATO Exit in a Second Term. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/us/politics/trump-nato-withdraw.html.
  18. Danish Ministry of Defence. (2016). Type selection of Denmark’s new fighter aircraft. https://fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/strategi/kampfly/-type-selection-denmarks-new-fighter-aircrafts-english-summary5-.pdf.
  19. DDIS Organisation. (n.d.). Danish Defence Intelligence Service. Retrieved 13 March 2021, from /en/about-ddis/organisation/.
  20. de Graaff, B. (2017). NATO Intelligence. University of Utrecht. https://rieas.gr/images/trasatlantic/bobdegraaff8.pdf.
  21. Dempsey, J. (2017). NATO’s Intelligence Deficit: It’s the Members, Stupid! - Carnegie Europe—Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. In Carnagie. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/70086.
  22. Department of the Army. (2003). Field Manual No. 3–13 Information Operations: Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/fm3-13-2003.pdf.
  23. Det Udenrigspolitiske Nævn. (2016). Redegørelse fra den tværministerielle arbejdsgruppe om Folketingets inddragelse ved anvendelse af den militære Computer Network Attack (CNA)-kapacitet. Regeringen. https://www.ft.dk/samling/20151/almdel/fou/bilag/170/1663433/index.htm.
  24. DoD. (2018). 2018 DoD Cyber Strategy and Cyber Posture Review Sharpening our Competitive Edge in Cyberspace. US Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2018/Sep/18/2002041659/-1/-1/1/Factsheet_for_Strategy_and_CPR_FINAL.pdf.
  25. FAK. (2019). Værnsfælles Doktrin for Militære Cyberspaceoperationer. Forsvarsakademiet. http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Documents/Værnsfælles%20Doktrin%20for%20Militære%20Cyberspaceoperationer%20VDMCO%202019.pdf.
  26. FE. (2019). FE beretning 2017-18-2019. Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste. https://www.fe-ddis.dk/globalassets/fe/dokumenter/2019/-fe-beretning-2017-18-2019.pdf.
  27. Flemming, J. (2018, April 12). Director’s speech at Cyber UK 2018—GCHQ.GOV.UK. GCHQ. https://www.gchq.gov.uk/speech/director-cyber-uk-speech-2018.
  28. Forligspartierne. (2009). Forsvarsforlig 2010–2014. Regeringen. https://fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/forlig/-forsvarsforlig-2010-2014-inkl-bilag-.pdf.
  29. Forligspartierne. (2012). AFTALE PÅ FORSVARSOMRÅDET 2013-2017. Regeringen. https://fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/forlig/-forsvarsforlig-2013-2017-inkl-bilag-.pdf.
  30. Forsvaret. (n.d.). Libyen—RDAF F-16 Libya Force. Forsvaret. Retrieved 13 March 2021, from https://da/opgaver/afsluttede-operationer/libyen/libyen---rdaf-f-16-libya-force/.
  31. Forsvaret. (2020). Caesar 8X8 155 mm Haubits. Forsvaret. https://www.forsvaret.dk/da/materiel2/caesar-8x8-155-mm-haubits/.
  32. Forsvaret. (2021). Få forklaringen her: Derfor bliver danske F-35 kampfly i USA. F-35. https://www.forsvaret.dk/da/materiel2/f-35---danmarks-nye-kampfly/f-35-ofte-stillede-sporgsmal/derfor-bliver-danske-f-35-kampfly-i-usa/.
  33. Forsvarsministeriet. (2004). K:\Folket\2004\akt\528435\akt187.fm 11-08-04 09:13:49 k01 pz. https://www.oes-cs.dk/aktstykker/0304-187.pdf.
  34. Forsvarsministeriet. (2018). Offensive cybereffekter. http://www.fmn.dk/temaer/nato/Documents/2018/Faktaark-cyber-effekter.pdf.
  35. Frederiksen, M. (2021). Statsminister Mette Frederiksens tale til Det Udenrigspolitiske Selskabs 75-års jubilæum den 29. Oktober 2021. https://www.stm.dk/statsministeren/taler/statsminister-mette-frederiksens-tale-til-det-udenrigspolitiske-selskabs-75-aars-jubilaeum-den-29-oktober-2021/.
  36. Gotev, G. (2018, July 18). Why die for Montenegro, Trump asks. Www.Euractiv.Com. https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/why-die-for-montenegro-trump-asks/.
  37. Goździewicz, W. (2019, November 11). Sovereign Cyber Effects Provided Voluntarily by Allies (SCEPVA). Cyber Defense Magazine. https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/sovereign-cyber/.
  38. Gramer, G. K. (1999). Optimizing Intelligence Sharing in a Coalition Environment. Naval War College. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a370627.pdf.
  39. Green, J. A. (2015). Cyber Warfare: A Multidisciplinary Analysis. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315761565
  40. Henriksen, A., & Ringsmose, J. (2011). Hvad fik Danmark ud af det?: Irak, Afghanistan og forholdet til Washington. Danish Institute for International Studies.
  41. Henriksen, A., & Ringsmose, J. (2018). “We’re America, Bitch!”: Europæisk og dansk sikkerhed under Trump. Internasjonal Politikk, 76(3), 121139. DOI: 10.23865/intpol.v76.896
  42. Hughes, D., & Colarik, A. (2016). Small State Acquisition of Offensive Cyberwarfare Capabilities: Towards Building an Analytical Framework. JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly, 83(4): 1926. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31863-9_12
  43. Hyde-Price, A. (2015). NATO and the European security system—A neo-realist analysis. In Theorising NATO - New perspectives on the Atlantic alliance (pp. 4160). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315658001-3
  44. Ingvorsen, E. S. (2017, April 24). TIDSLINJE Danske F16-fly smed 384 bomber i Syrien og Irak. DR. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/tidslinje-danske-f16-fly-smed-384-bomber-i-syrien-og-irak.
  45. Jakobsen, P. V. (2016). Danmark gaar ikke i krig med ISIS for at vinde, men for at være med. Ræson, 02/2016, 6067.
  46. Jakobsen, P. V. (2021). Denmark in NATO, 1949–2019: From laggard to leader to loyal? In M. Testoni (Ed.), NATO and Transatlantic Relations in the 21st century: Foreign and Security Policy Perspectives. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003045434-6
  47. Jakobsen, P. V. (2022). Understanding and teaching military strategy as theories of success at the Royal Danish Defence College (Forthcoming). Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, Special Issue.
  48. Jakobsen, P. V., & Ringsmose, J. (2017). The Trump effect won’t last (Policy Brief No. 16/2017; p. 4). Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. https://nupi.brage.unit.no/nupi-xmlui/handle/11250/2468677.
  49. Jakobsen, P. V., Ringsmose, J., & Saxi, H. L. (2018). Prestige-seeking small states: Danish and Norwegian military contributions to US-led operations. European Journal of International Security, 3(02): 256277. DOI: 10.1017/eis.2017.20
  50. Jensen, M. S. (2022). Five good reasons for NATO’s pragmatic approach to offensive cyberspace operations. Defence Studies, 125. DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2022.2080661
  51. JFQ. (2019). An Interview with Paul M. Nakasone. Joint Force Quarterly, 92, 49.
  52. Joffe, J. (1989). Nato and the Dilemmas of a Nuclear Alliance*. Journal of International Affairs, 43(1), 29.
  53. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (1998). JP 3–13 Joint Doctrine for Information Operations. https://universityofleeds.github.io/philtaylorpapers/pmt/exhibits/469/jp3_13.pdf.
  54. Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2018). Joint Publication 3–12 Cyberspace Operations. Joint Chiefs of Staff. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_12.pdf.
  55. Kanno-Youngs, Z., & Sanger, D. E. (2021, July 19). U.S. Accuses China of Hacking Microsoft. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/19/us/politics/microsoft-hacking-china-biden.html.
  56. Kaplan, F. M. (2016). Dark territory: The secret history of cyber war (First Simon&Schuster hardcover edition). Simon & Schuster.
  57. Kaufman, J. P. (2017). The US perspective on NATO under Trump: Lessons of the past and prospects for the future. International Affairs, 93(2): 251266. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iix009
  58. Lake, D. A. (1999). Entangling Relations. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691216119
  59. Liebetrau, T. (2020). Dansk offensiv cybermagt mellem angreb, spionage og forsvar. Københavns Universitet, Center for militære studier.
  60. Lindegaard, R., & Nielsen, N. S. (2018). Naser Khader: Vi skal angribe russiske hacker-netværk | Politik | DR. DR. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/naser-khader-vi-skal-angribe-russiske-hacker-netvaerk.
  61. Loleski, S. (2019). From cold to cyber warriors: The origins and expansion of NSA’s Tailored Access Operations (TAO) to Shadow Brokers. Intelligence and National Security, 34(1): 112128. DOI: 10.1080/02684527.2018.1532627
  62. Mallory, K. (2018). New Challenges in Cross-Domain Deterrence. RAND Corporation. DOI: 10.7249/PE259
  63. Maras, M.-H. (2017). Overcoming the intelligence-sharing paradox: Improving information sharing through change in organizational culture. Comparative Strategy, 36(3): 187197. DOI: 10.1080/01495933.2017.1338477
  64. Marcus, J. (2016, July 21). Trump says US may abandon automatic protections for Nato countries. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36852805.
  65. Mariager, R., & Wivel, A. (2019). Hvorfor gik Danmark i krig? Irak og tvaergaaende analyser Bind 3. Københavns Universitet. https://krigsudredning.ku.dk/dokumenter/Bind_3.pdf.
  66. Martelle, M. (2020). USCYBERCOM After Action Assessments of Operation GLOWING SYMPHONY | National Security Archive. In National Security Archive. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault/2020-01-21/uscybercom-after-action-assessments-operation-glowing-symphony.
  67. McGhie, S. N. (2021, March 9). Danmark må opgive at levere en kampklar brigade til NATO i 2024. Berlingske.dk. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/1547256.
  68. Mehta, A. (2017, January 27). As F-35 Comes Online, Norway to Scrap F-16 Fleet. Defense News. https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/01/27/as-f-35-comes-online-norway-to-scrap-f-16-fleet/.
  69. Montgomery, E. B. (2020). Signals of strength: Capability demonstrations and perceptions of military power. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(2): 309330. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2019.1626724
  70. Nakashima. (2017a). Trump administration pulls back curtain on secretive cybersecurity process—The Washington Post. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-pulls-back-curtain-on-secretive-cybersecurity-process/2017/11/15/f9a2e3ec-ca16-11e7-aa96-54417592cf72_story.html?utm_campaign=New Campaign&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Sailthru&u.
  71. Nakashima. (2017b, May 9). U.S. military cyber operation to attack ISIS last year sparked heated debate over alerting allies—The Washington Post. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-military-cyber-operation-to-attack-isis-last-year-sparked-heated-debate-over-alerting-allies/2017/05/08/93a120a2-30d5-11e7-9dec-764dc781686f_story.html.
  72. Nakashima. (2018a). Trump gives the military more latitude to use offensive cyber tools against adversaries—The Washington Post. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-gives-the-military-more-latitude-to-use-offensive-cyber-tools-against-adversaries/2018/08/16/75f7a100-a160-11e8-8e87-c869fe70a721_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.89e4be3895b0.
  73. Nakashima. (2018b, September 20). White House authorizes ‘offensive cyber operations’ to deter foreign adversaries. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-authorizes-offensive-cyber-operations-to-deter-foreign-adversaries-bolton-says/2018/09/20/b5880578-bd0b-11e8-b7d2-0773aa1e33da_story.html.
  74. Nakasone, P. M. (2019a). A Cyber Force for Persistant Operations. Joint Force Quarterly, 1014.
  75. Nakasone, P. M. (2019b). Statement of General Paul M. Nakasone Commander United States Cyber Command Before the Senate Committee on Armed Services. Senate Committee on Armed Services. https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Nakasone_02-14-19.pdf.
  76. Nakasone, P. M., & Sulmeyer, M. (2020). How to Compete in Cyberspace. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-08-25/cybersecurity.
  77. NATO. (2014). Wales Summit Declaration issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Wales. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm.
  78. NATO. (2020). AJP-3.20, Allied Joint Doctrine for Cyberspace Operations (Edition A). NATO Standardization Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/899678/doctrine_nato_cyberspace_operations_ajp_3_20_1_.pdf.
  79. NATO. (2021, June 23). NATO Air policing: Securing NATO airspace. NATO. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_132685.htm.
  80. NIST. (n.d.). computer network exploitation (CNE)—Glossary | CSRC. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 29 January 2021, from https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/computer_network_exploitation.
  81. Obama, B. (2012). PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/PPD-20. In Presidential Policy Directive. https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/ppd/ppd-20.pdf.
  82. Obama, B. (2013, January 1). Presidential Policy Directive 20 [Fact Sheet] (Presidential Policy Directive 20; PDD 20). Homeland Security Digital Library. https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=.
  83. ODNI. (2021). ODNI Annual Threat Assessment. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2021-Unclassified-Report.pdf.
  84. Panettieri, J. (2021, June 7). Colonial Pipeline Cyberattack: Timeline and Ransomware Attack Recovery Details. MSSP Alert. https://www.msspalert.com/cybersecurity-breaches-and-attacks/ransomware/colonial-pipeline-investigation/.
  85. Pomerleau, M. (2018). Cyber Command chief will weigh in on split from NSA. Fifth Domain. https://www.fifthdomain.com/dod/cybercom/2018/08/02/cyber-command-chief-will-weigh-in-on-split-from-nsa/.
  86. Regeringen. (2005). Forsvarsforlig-2005–2009. https://www.fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/forlig/-forsvarsforlig-2005-2009-inkl-bilag-.pdf.
  87. Regeringen. (2018). Forsvarsforlig 2018. https://www.regeringen.dk/nyheder/2018/forsvarsforlig-2018/.
  88. Ringsmose, J. (2013). Investing in Fighters and Alliances: Norway, Denmark, and the Bumpy Road to the Joint Strike Fighter. International Journal, 68(1): 93110. DOI: 10.1177/002070201306800107
  89. Ringsmose, J., & Henriksen, A. (2017). Trump, nato og den europæiske sikkerhedsarkitektur: Usikkerhed i den transatlantiske alliance. Danish Institute for International Studies.
  90. Robinson, M., Jones, K., & Janicke, H. (2015). Cyber warfare: Issues and challenges. Computers & Security, 49, 7094. DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2014.11.007
  91. Rumsfeld, D. (2006). National Military Strategy for Cyberspace Operations 2006. US DOD.
  92. Sanger, D. E. (2018). Trump Loosens Secretive Restraints on Ordering Cyberattacks—The New York Times. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/us/politics/trump-cyberattacks-orders.html?action=click&module=RelatedCoverage&pgtype=Article&region=Footer.
  93. Sanger, D. E., Barnes, J. E., & Perlroth, N. (2021, March 7). Preparing for Retaliation Against Russia, U.S. Confronts Hacking by China. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/microsoft-solarwinds-hack-russia-china.html.
  94. Sanger, D. E., & Schmitt, C. (2017, June 12). U.S. Cyberweapons, Used Against Iran and North Korea, Are a Disappointment Against ISIS – The New York Times. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/world/middleeast/isis-cyber.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection2Ftechnology&action=click&contentCollection=technology&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0.
  95. Schaub, G., & Jakobsson, A. K. (2018). Denmark in NATO : Paying for Protection, Bleeding for Prestige. War on the Rocks.
  96. Schaub, G., & Michaelsen, H. P. H. (2018). Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence (p. 70). Københavns Universitet, Center for militære studier.
  97. Schuessler, J. M., & Shifrinson, J. R. (2019). The Shadow of Exit from NATO. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 13(3): 3851.
  98. Seagle, A. N. (2015). Intelligence Sharing Practices Within NATO: An English School Perspective. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 28(3): 557577. DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2015.1022468
  99. Sikdar, B. (2017). Cybersecurity Risks from Non-Genuine Software. National University of Singapore (NUS) Faculty of Engineering. https://news.microsoft.com/uploads/2017/10/Whitepaper-Cybersecurity-Risks-from-Non-Genuine-Software.pdf.
  100. Smeets, M. (2020). Intelligence and National Security US cyber strategy of persistent engagement & defend forward: Implications for the alliance and intelligence collection. DOI: 10.1080/02684527.2020.1729316
  101. Snyder, G. H. (1984). The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics, 36(04): 461495. DOI: 10.2307/2010183
  102. Taillat, S. (2019). Disrupt and restraint: The evolution of cyber conflict and the implications for collective security. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(3): 368381. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2019.1581458
  103. Teglskov Jacobsen, J. (2017). Danmark bør undgå en “digital Genèvekonvention”. RDDC. http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Documents/Danmarkscyberpolitik.pdf.
  104. The White House. (2021, April 15). Imposing Costs for Harmful Foreign Activities by the Russian Government. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/15/fact-sheet-imposing-costs-for-harmful-foreign-activities-by-the-russian-government/.
  105. Tikk, E., Kerttunen, M., & Hovhannisyan, K. (2021). Cyber Conflict Fact Book 2020. CPI Press.
  106. Trump. (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.
  107. Trump. (2018). National Cyber Strategy of the United States of America. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Cyber-Strategy.pdf.
  108. Turton, W., & Mehrota, K. (2021, June 4). Hackers Breached Colonial Pipeline Using Compromised Password. Bloomberg.Com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-04/hackers-breached-colonial-pipeline-using-compromised-password.
  109. USCYBERCOM. (2016). USCYBERCOM After Action Assessments of Operation GLOWING SYMPHONY (pp. 113). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/cyber-vault/2020-01-21/uscybercom-after-action-assessments-operation-glowing-symphony
  110. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  111. Waltz, K. N. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 18(2), 44. DOI: 10.2307/2539097
  112. Yadav, T., & Rao, A. (2015). Technical Aspects of Cyber Kill Chain. In J. H. Abawaji (Ed.), SSCC 2015 (pp. 438452). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22915-7_40
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.139 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 128
Submitted on: Jan 11, 2022
Accepted on: May 10, 2022
Published on: Sep 9, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Mikkel Storm Jensen, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.