Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
High Profile, Low Availability: The Emerging US Maritime-Strategic Approach to NATO’s Northern Flank Cover

High Profile, Low Availability: The Emerging US Maritime-Strategic Approach to NATO’s Northern Flank

Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Bayer, M., & Roughead, G. (2017). Strategic Readiness Review. Retrieved from https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2017/strategic-readiness-review_12112017.pdf
  2. Boston, S., & Massicot, D. (2017). The Russian Way of Warfare: A Primer. Retrieved from. DOI: 10.7249/PE231
  3. Bredesen, M. G., & Friis, K. (2020). Missiles, Vessels and Active Defence. The RUSI Journal, 165(5–6), 6878. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2020.1829991
  4. Bush, G. H. W. (1989). A Europe Whole and Free; Remarks to the Citizens in Mainz. Retrieved from https://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga6-890531.htm
  5. Cimbala, S. J., & McDermott, R. N. (2016). Putin and the Nuclear Dimension to Russian Strategy. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29(4), 535553. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2016.1232532
  6. Clark, B., & Sloman, J. (2015). Deploying Beyond Their Means: America’s Navy and Marine Corps at a Tipping Point. Retrieved from https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/deploying-beyond-their-means-americas-navy-and-marine-corps-at-a-tipping-po#:~:text=Studies-,Deploying%20Beyond%20Their%20Means%3A%20America%27s%20Navy%20and,Corps%20At%20a%20Tipping%20Point&text=Today%20the%20Navy%20and%20Marine,maintenance%2C%20and%20time%20at%20home
  7. Clark, B., Walton, T. A., & Lemon, A. (2020). Strengthening the U.S. Defense Maritime Industrial Base: A Plan to Improve Maritime Industry’s Contribution to National Security. Retrieved from https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/strengthening-the-u.s-defense-maritime-industrial-base-a-plan-to-improve-maritime-industrys-contribution-to-national-security
  8. Clark, M. (2021). U.S. Navy Shipyards Desperately Need Revitalization and a Rethink. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/us-navy-shipyards-desperately-need-revitalization-and-rethink
  9. Congressional Budget Office. (2021a). An Analysis of the Navy’s December 2020 Shipbuilding Plan. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2021-04/57091-Shipbuilding.pdf
  10. Congressional Budget Office. (2021b). An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2022 Shipbuilding Plan. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57414
  11. Congressional Budget Office. (2021c). The Capacity of the Navy’s Shipyards to Maintain Its Submarines. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57026
  12. Cronin, P. M., Rapp-Hooper, M., Krejsa, H., Sullivan, A., & Doshi, R. (2017). Beyond the San Hai: The Challenge of China’s Blue-Water Navy. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep06325
  13. CSIS. (2018). How is China Modernizing its Navy? Retrieved from https://chinapower.csis.org/china-naval-modernization/
  14. CSIS. (Year not given). Russia/NATO A2AD. Retrieved from https://csis.carto.com/builder/20149366-a13e-11e6-9c96-0e3ff518bd15/embed
  15. Dalsjö, R., Berglund, C., & Jonsson, M. (2019). Bursting the Bubble. Russian A2/AD in the Baltic Sea Region: Capabilities, Countermeasures, and Implications. Retrieved from file://brukereifs/brukere$/alundesgaard/Downloads/FOI-R--4651--SE.pdf
  16. Department of the Army. (2021). Army Multi-Domain Transformation: Ready to Win in Competition and Conflict. Retrieved from https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/23/eeac3d01/20210319-csa-paper-1-signed-print-version.pdf
  17. Detsch, J., & Mackinnon, A. (2021). China and Russia Turn Deeper Ties into a Military Challenge for Biden. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/04/20/china-russia-military-attention-us-policy-xi-putin-biden-taiwan-ukraine/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=EBB%2004.21.21&utm_term=Editorial%20-%20Early%20Bird%20Brief
  18. Dougherty, C. (2021). Gradually then Suddenly: Explaining the Navy’s Strategic Bankruptcy. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2021/06/gradually-and-then-suddenly-explaining-the-navys-strategic-bankruptcy/
  19. Ellehuus, R., , J. G., Allers, R., & Bjur, I. (2020). Surprise and Stability in the High North. Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/surprise-and-stability-high-north#:~:text=Activities%20that%20have%20been%20characterized,deployment%20of%20the%20Harry%20S
  20. Elleman, B. A. (2019). The Making of the Modern Chinese Navy: Special Historical Characteristics. London, UK: Anthem Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvndv98k
  21. Filipoff, D. (2018). How the Fleet Forgot to Fight, pt. 5: Material Condition and Availability. Retrieved from https://cimsec.org/how-the-fleet-forgot-to-fight-pt-5-material-condition-and-availability/
  22. Filipoff, D. (2019). A Navy Astray: Remembering how the Fleet Forgot to Fight. Retrieved from https://cimsec.org/a-navy-astray-remembering-how-the-fleet-forgot-to-fight/
  23. Foggo, J. G. (2016). The Fourth Battle of the Atlantic. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 142(6). Retrieved from https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2016-06/fourth-battle-atlantic
  24. Gerasimov, V. (2019, 2 March). Speech given at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Military Science. Retrieved from https://www.memri.org/reports/russian-first-deputy-defense-minister-gerasimov-our-response-based-active-defense-strategy
  25. Gompert, D. C., Cheung, T. M., Lo, T., McDevitt, M., Mulvenon, J., Shlapak, D., … Johnson, S. (2007). Coping with the Dragon: Essays on PLA Transformation and the U.S. Military. Washington, DC: National Defense University. DOI: 10.21236/ADA475867
  26. Government Accountability Office. (2019). Navy Maintenance: Persistent and Substantial Ship and Submarine Maintenance Delays Hinder Efforts to Rebuild Readiness. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-257t.pdf
  27. Government Accountability Office. (2020a). Navy and Marine Corps: Services Continue Efforts to Rebuild Readiness, But Recovery Will Take Years and Sustained Management Attention. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-225t.pdf
  28. Government Accountability Office. (2020b). Navy Ship Maintenance: Evaluating Pilot Program Outcomes Could Inform Decisions to Address Persistent Schedule Challenges. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-370.pdf
  29. Government Accountability Office. (2020c). Navy Shipyards: Actions Needed to Address the Main Factors Causing Maintenance Delays for Aircraft Carriers and Submarines. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-20-588
  30. Government Accountability Office. (2021a). Military Readiness: Department of Defense Domain Readiness Varied from Fiscal Year 2017 through Fiscal Year 2019. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-279.pdf
  31. Government Accountability Office. (2021b). Navy Readiness: Additional Efforts Are Needed to Manage Fatigue, Reduce Crewing Shortfalls, and Implement Training. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-366
  32. Gramer, R. (2016). Russia’s Ambitions in the Atlantic. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2016-09-09/russias-ambitions-atlantic
  33. Grove, T., & Marson, J. (2020). Russian Submarines Test NATO in Icy North Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-submarines-test-nato-in-icy-north-atlantic-11593682201?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=4&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=EBB%2007.06.20&utm_term=Editorial%20-%20Early%20Bird%20Brief
  34. Heginbotham, E., Nixon, M., Morgan, F. E., Heim, J. L., Hagen, J., Sheng, L., … Morris, L. J. (2015). The U.S.-China military scorecard: forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power, 1996–2017. DOI: 10.7249/RR392
  35. Heier, T. (2021). Militærmakt i nord (Military Power in the North). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  36. Hendrix, J. (2021). On the Eve of Destruction. Retrieved from https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/on-the-eve-of-destruction/
  37. Herzinger, B. (2021). The Budget (and Fleet) that Might Have Been. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2021/06/the-budget-and-fleet-that-might-have-been/
  38. Holmes, J. R., & Yoshihara, T. (2018). Red star over the Pacific: China’s rise and the challenge to U.S. maritime strategy: Naval Institute Press.
  39. Kofman, M. (2019). It’s Time to Talk About A2/AD: Rethinking the Russian Military Challenge. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2019/09/its-time-to-talk-about-a2-ad-rethinking-the-russian-military-challenge/
  40. Kofman, M. (2020). Russian A2/AD: It is not overrated, just poorly understood. Retrieved from https://www.stratagem.no/russian-a2-ad-misunderstood/
  41. Kofman, M., Fink, A., Gorenburg, D., Chesnut, M., Edmonds, J., & Waller, J. (2021). Russian Military Strategy: Core Tenets and Operational Concepts. Retrieved from https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/pdf/Russian-Military-Strategy-Core-Tenets-and-Operational-Concepts.pdf
  42. Kvam, I. H.-P. (2020). Nordflåtens evne til kystnær maktprojeksjon. Implikasjoner for Bastionsforsvaret (The Northern Fleet’s Capacity for Littoral Power Projection. Implications for the Bastion Defence). In R. Espevik & B. Terjesen (Eds.), Sjømilitær utvikling i Russland og Kina. Grunnlag for bekymring? (pp. 2258). Haakonsvern: The Norwegian Defence University College.
  43. Larter, D. B. (2021). Surface ship readiness continues to struggle, US Navy inspections show. Retrieved from https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2021/03/03/surface-ship-readiness-continues-to-struggle-navy-inspections-show/
  44. McKenzie, S. (2018). US sub hunters to operate from RAF station in Scotland. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-45269999
  45. McLeary, P. (2020a). CJCS Milley Predicts DoD Budget ‘Bloodletting’ To Fund Navy. Retrieved from https://breakingdefense.com/2020/12/cjcs-milley-predicts-dod-bloodletting-to-fund-navy-priorities/
  46. McLeary, P. (2020b). US, NATO Warships Exercise Off Russia’s Arctic Coast. Retrieved from https://breakingdefense.com/2020/09/us-nato-warships-exercise-off-russias-arctic-coast/
  47. Montgomery, N. (2019). No permanent basing for Navy sub hunters in Iceland despite construction projects. Retrieved from https://www.stripes.com/news/no-permanent-basing-for-navy-sub-hunters-in-iceland-despite-construction-projects-1.505835
  48. Naval Vessel Register. (2021). The Official Inventory of US Naval Ships and Service Craft. Retrieved from https://www.nvr.navy.mil/SHIPS.html
  49. Nilsen, T. (2020a). In a controversial move, Norway sails frigate into Russian economic zone together with U.K. and U.S. navy ships. Retrieved from https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2020/09/norwegian-frigate-sails-near-russias-fishermen-peninsula-together-uk-and-us-ships
  50. Nilsen, T. (2020b). U.S. warship returns to Barents Sea. Retrieved from https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2020/10/us-warship-returns-barents-sea
  51. Nordenman, M. (2019). The new battle for the Atlantic: emerging naval competition with Russia in the Far North. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  52. Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA). (2021). DSA Info: Anløp av reaktordrevne fartøy til norske farvann og havner (DSA info: Port Calls by Nuclear Propelled Vessels to Norwegian Waters and Ports). Retrieved from https://dsa.no/publikasjoner/dsa-info-4-2021-anlop-av-reaktordrevne-fartoy-til-norske-farvann-og-havner/DSA-info_4-2021%20Anl%C3%B8p.pdf
  53. O’Rourke, R. (2021a). China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33153/256
  54. O’Rourke, R. (2021b). China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33153/249
  55. O’Rourke, R. (2021c). Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress (RL32665). Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32665
  56. Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. (2021). Report to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels for Fiscal Year 2022. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jun/17/2002744915/-1/-1/0/PB22%20SHIPBUILDING%20PLAN%20JUNE%202021_FINAL.PDF
  57. Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2020). Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2020. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2020/Sep/01/2002488689/-1/-1/1/2020-DOD-CHINA-MILITARY-POWER-REPORT-FINAL.PDF
  58. Olsen, J. A. (Ed.) (2017). NATO and the North Atlantic: Revitalising Collective Defence (Vol. 87). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351025027
  59. Olsen, J. A. (Ed.) (2018). Security in Northern Europe: Deterrence, Defence and Dialogue. Whitehall, London: RUSI. DOI: 10.4324/9780429289347
  60. Parnemo, L. K. (2019). Russia’s Naval Development — Grand Ambitions and Tactical Pragmatism. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 32(1), 4169. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2019.1552678
  61. Pincus, R. (2020). Towards a New Arctic: Changing Strategic Geography in the GIUK Gap. The RUSI Journal, 165(3), 5058. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2020.1769496
  62. Pincus, R. (2021). The Indo-Pacific Dimension in US Arctic Strategy. The Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 4(7), 97105. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2021/Oct/24/2002878836/-1/-1/1/JIPA%20-%20PINCUS%20-%20ARCTIC.PDF
  63. Polmar, N. (Ed.) (2013). The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet (19 ed.). Maryland, MD: Naval Institute Press.
  64. Rodihan, C., Crouch, M., & Fairbanks, R. (2021). Predictable Strategy and Unpredictable Operations: The implications of agility in Northern Europe. Retrieved from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Predictable_Strategy_and_Unpredictable_Operations.pdf
  65. Ross, R. S., Dong, W., & Tunsjø, Ø. (2021). US-China foreign relations: power transition and its implications for Europe and Asia. London, New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003056683
  66. Rubel, R. C. (2021). Think Differently about Naval Presence. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 147(12). Retrieved from https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2021/december/think-differently-about-naval-presence?fbclid=IwAR0uf372dWg_RhvhGizHeb5xEnHzvZ1X6p2-WJMWqcAco-eeM4N1EmQRQik
  67. Saxi, H. L. (2018). The UK Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF). In: Forsvarets høgskole.
  68. Saxi, H. L. (2019). The rise, fall and resurgence of Nordic defence cooperation. International affairs (London), 95(3), 659680. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiz049
  69. Saxi, H. L. (2022). Alignment but not Alliance: Nordic Operational Military Cooperation. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 5371. DOI: 10.23865/arctic.v13.3380
  70. Shelbourne, M. (2021). CNO Gilday: Tight Budgets Require Balance Between Readiness, Modernization. Retrieved from https://news.usni.org/2021/06/30/cno-gilday-tight-budgets-require-balance-between-readiness-modernization
  71. Statement of General Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., USMC, 19th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: Department of Defense Budget Hearing, (2018).
  72. Swartz, P., & Duggan, K. (2011a). The U.S. Navy in the World (1981–1990): Context for U.S. Navy Capstone Strategies and Concepts. DOI: 10.21236/ADA564877
  73. Swartz, P., & Duggan, K. (2011b). The U.S. Navy in the World (2001-2010): Context for U.S. Navy Capstone Strategies and Concepts. DOI: 10.21236/ADA564884
  74. Tamnes, R. (1991). The United States and the Cold War in the High North. Oslo: Ad Notam.
  75. The Military Balance. (2021). (Vol. 122): International Institute for Strategic Studies.
  76. The White House. (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
  77. The White House. (2021). Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf
  78. United States Congress. 10 U.S. Code § 8671 – Determination of vessel delivery dates, (2021).
  79. United States Fleet Forces Command. (2017). Comprehensive Review of Recent Surface Force Incidents.
  80. US Department of Defense. (2018). Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf
  81. US Department of Defense. (2022). Fact Sheet: 2022 National Defense Strategy. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/amlundesgaard/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.Outlook/8FPARR5F/NDS-FACT-SHEET.PDF
  82. US Department of State. (2021). U.S.-Norway Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/0a7035b6c001426daf41e6158e8f9b4c/sdca-english-version.pdf
  83. US Marine Corps. (2016). Marine Corps Order 4000.58. Retrieved from https://www.marines.mil/portals/1/Publications/MCO%204000.58.pdf?ver=2016-08-23-124019-670
  84. US Marine Corps. (2019). Commandant’s Planning Guidance: 38th Commandant of the Marine Corps. Retrieved from https://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/142/Docs/%2038th%20Commandant%27s%20Planning%20Guidance_2019.pdf?ver=2019-07-16-200152-700
  85. US Marine Corps. (2020a). Force Design 2030. Retrieved from https://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/142/Docs/CMC38%20Force%20Design%202030%20Report%20Phase%20I%20and%20II.pdf?ver=2020-03-26-121328-460
  86. US Marine Corps. (2020b). Major Changes Coming for Marines’ Norway Deployments. Retrieved from https://www.iimef.marines.mil/News/News-Article/Article/2311268/major-changes-coming-for-marines-norway-deployments/
  87. US Marine Corps. (2021a). Force Design 2030: Annual Update. Retrieved from https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Docs/2021%20Force%20Design%20Annual%20Update.pdf?ver=D8ZSD8j66Pci2kEsR4BYDw%3D%3D&timestamp=1619455504887
  88. US Marine Corps. (2021b). Marine Littoral Regiment. Retrieved from https://www.marines.mil/News/News-Display/Article/2708146/marine-littoral-regiment-mlr/
  89. US Marine Corps. (2021c). Tentative Manual For Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations. Department of the Navy Retrieved from https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20616385/tm-eabo-first-edition-rev-20210211.pdf
  90. US Navy. (2008a). The Maritime Strategy 1986 (unclassified). In John B. Hattendorf & Captain Peter M. Swartz (Eds.), U.S. Naval Strategy in the 1980s: Selected Documents. Newport: Naval War College Press.
  91. US Navy. (2008b). The Maritime Strategy, 1984. In J. B. Hattendorf & P. M. Swartz (Eds.), U.S. Naval Strategy in the 1980s: Selected Documents. Newport: Naval War College Press.
  92. US Navy. (2008c). The Maritime Strategy: Global Maritime Elements for U.S. National Strategy, 1985 (classified). In J. B. Hattendorf & C. P. M. Swartz (Eds.), U.S. Naval Strategy in the 1980s: Selected Documents. Newport: Naval War College Press.
  93. US Navy. (2008d). The Maritime Strategy: The Maritime Component of the U.S. National Strategy, 1988–1989. In J. B. Hattendorf & P. M. Swartz (Eds.), U.S. Naval Strategy in the 1980s: Selected Documents. Newport: Naval War College Press.
  94. US Navy Board of Inspection and Survey. (2021). INSURV Annual Report. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2021/Mar/03/2002592279/-1/-1/0/2020-INSURV-ANNUAL-REPORT.PDF/2020-INSURV-ANNUAL-REPORT.PDF
  95. US Navy, & US Marine Corps. (2021). A Blue Arctic. Department of the Navy. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2021/Jan/05/2002560338/-1/-1/0/ARCTIC%20BLUEPRINT%202021%20FINAL.PDF/ARCTIC%20BLUEPRINT%202021%20FINAL.PDF
  96. US Navy, US Marine Corps, & US Coast Guard. (2020). Advantage at Sea: Prevailing with Integrated All-Domain Naval Power. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2020/Dec/16/2002553074/-1/-1/0/TRISERVICESTRATEGY.PDF
  97. VanHerck, G. D. (2021) Rethinking Homeland Defense: Global Integration, Domain Awareness, Information Dominance and Decision Superiority/Interviewer: T. Karako. CSIS.
  98. Work, R. (2021). A Slavish Devotion to Forward Presence Has Nearly Broken the U.S. Navy. US Naval Institute Proceedings, 147(12). Retrieved from https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2021/december/slavish-devotion-forward-presence-has-nearly-broken-us-navy
  99. Zysk, K. (2020). Russia’s Military Build-Up in the Arctic: to What End? Retrieved from https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/IOP-2020-U-027998-Final.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.136 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 334 - 349
Submitted on: Dec 22, 2021
Accepted on: May 2, 2022
Published on: Sep 26, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Amund Nørstrud Lundesgaard, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.