References
- Aguilera, R.V., Aragón-Correa, J.A., Marano, V., Tashman, P.A., 2021. The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468–1497. DOI: 10.1177/0149206321991212
- Alessi, L., Cojoianu, T., Hoepner, A.G.F., Michelon, G., 2024. Accounting for the EU Green Taxonomy: Exploring its concept, data and analytics. Accounting Forum, 48(3), 365–373. DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2024.2369343
- Alexander, A., Walker, H., Naim, M., 2014. Decision theory in sustainable supply chain management: A literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 504–522. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-01-2014-0007
- Berg, F., Kölbel, J.F., Rigobon, R., 2022. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfac033
- Bohnert, S., 2025. The shift to unilateralism in the European Union’s trade policy: An exercise in taxonomy. Common Market Law Review, 62(4), 1057–1088. DOI: 10.54648/COLA2025066
- Busch, D., 2025. Sustainable investment management in the European Union. Capital Markets Law Journal, 20(4). DOI: 10.1093/cmlj/kmaf018
- Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Cricelli, L., Esposito, E., Strazzullo, S., 2022. The future of sustainable supply chains: A novel tertiary-systematic methodology. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(6), 762–784. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0383
- Deloitte, n.d., EU taxonomy: Overview and implementation guidance. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ (Accessed: 15 January 2025).
- Djokovic, J.M., Nikolic, R.R., Bujnak, J., Hadzima, B., Pastorek F., Dwornicka, R., Ulewicz, R., 2022. Selection of the Optimal Window Type and Orientation for the Two Cities in Serbia and One in Slovakia. Energies, 15(1), art. 323. DOI: 10.3390/en15010323
- Dobija, D., Zarzycka, E., Krasodomska, J., Kozłowski, Ł., Kravchenko, G., 2025. Reporting under the EU Taxonomy Regulation: The role of sustainability committee and sustainability-related executive compensation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 7888–7901. DOI: 10.1002/csr.70114
- Dudek, A., 2011. Investigations of microstructure and properties in bioceramic coatings used in medicine. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 56(1), pp.135-140. DOI: 10.2478/v10172-011-0015-y
- Dwornicka, R., 2014. The Impact of the Power Plant Unit Start-Up Scheme on the Pollution Load. Advanced Materials Research, 874, pp.63-69. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.874.63
- Esposto, E., Nupieri, T., 2025. The divide in the EU green taxonomy: How conflict impacts the quality of policy advisory systems. Policy and Society, 44(3), 318–334. DOI: 10.1093/polsoc/puaf007
- EU Taxonomy Info, n.d., Application of the EU Taxonomy for companies. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/bankingand-finance/sustainable-finance/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en (Accessed: 15 January 2025).
- European Commission, 2021. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Official Journal of the European Union, L442, 1–349.
- European Union, 2020. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment. Official Journal of the European Union, L198, 13–43.
- Fatica, S., Panzica, R., 2021. Green bonds as a tool against climate change? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2688–2701. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2771
- Gądek-Moszczak, A., Pietraszek, J., Jasiewicz, B., Sikorska, S., Wojnar, L., 2015. The Bootstrap Approach to the Comparison of Two Methods Applied to the Evaluation of the Growth Index in the Analysis of the Digital X-ray Image of a Bone Regenerate. In: Camacho, D., Kim, SW., Trawiński, B. (eds) New Trends in Computational Collective Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 572, pp.127-136. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10774-5_12
- Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., 2017. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
- Gombkötő, N., Hámori, J., Rózsa, A., Troján, S., Hegyi, J., Lámfalusi, I., Kacz, K., 2025. Sustainability reporting practices of Hungarian food subsectors from EU taxonomy perspectives. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 129. DOI: 10.1007/s43621-025-00926-2
- Hummel, K., Bauernhofer, K., 2024. Consequences of sustainability reporting mandates: Evidence from the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Accounting Forum, 48(3), 374–400. DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2024.2301854
- Kretschmer, M., Buxmann, H.N., Singer-Coudoux, K., Orth, R., 2025. Kompetenzmodell „Green Skills“ und Wesentlichkeitsanalyse. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 120(10), 666–670. DOI: 10.1515/zwf-2025-1119
- La Torre, M., Leo, S., Panetta, I.C., 2021. Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1620–1634. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2132
- Lazar, S., Potočan, V., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M., 2022. Boosting sustainable operations with sustainable supply chain modeling: A case of organizational culture and normative commitment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 11131. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191711131
- O’Reilly, S., Gorman, L., Mac an Bhaird, C., Brennan, N.M., 2024. Implementing the European Union Green Taxonomy: Implications for smalland medium-sized enterprises. Accounting Forum, 48(3), 401–426. DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2023.2272394
- Opydo, M., Dudek, A., Kobylecki, R., 2019. Characteristics of solids accumulation on steel samples during co-combustion of biomass and coal in a CFB boiler. Biomass & Bioenergy, 120, pp.291-300. 10.1016/j.biombioe. 2018.11.027
- Orman, Ł.J., Majewski, G., Radek, N., Pietraszek, J., 2022. Analysis of Thermal Comfort in Intelligent and Traditional Buildings. Energies, 15(18), art. 6522. DOI: 10.3390/en15186522
- Ostojić, S., Simone, L., Edler, M., Traverso, M., 2024. How practically applicable are the EU Taxonomy criteria for corporates? An analysis for the electrical industry. Sustainability, 16(4), 1575. DOI: 10.3390/su16041575
- Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K., Bednárová, L., Šimková, Z., 2025. Integration of key performance indicators (KPI) taxonomy and energy efficiency analysis in the aluminium industry using Industry 4.0 technologies. Energies, 18(23), 6133. DOI: 10.3390/en18236133
- Pietraszek, J., Skrzypczak-Pietraszek, E., 2014. The Optimization of the Technological Process with the Fuzzy Regression. Advanced Materials Research, 874, pp. 151-155. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.874.151
- Portal Ecolex Life, n.d., Zakonodaja – legal acts database. Available at: https://www.eurolex.si/ (Accessed: 15 January 2025).
- Sala, S., Farioli, F., Zamagni, A., 2013. Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(9), 1652–1671. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0509-5
- Schütze, F., Stede, J., 2021. The EU sustainable finance taxonomy and its contribution to climate neutrality. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(1), 128-160. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2021.2006129
- Skrzypczak-Pietraszek, E., Pietraszek, J., 2014. Seasonal Changes of Flavonoid Content in Melittis melissophyllum L. (Lamiaceae). Chemistry & Biodiversity, 11(4), pp.562-570. DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.201300148
- Staniszewska, E., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M., 2020. Eco-design processes in the automotive industry. Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 131–137. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.25
- Szczotok, A., Pietraszek, J., Radek., N., 2017. Metallographic study and repeatability analysis of γ′ phase precipitates in cored, thin-walled castings made from IN713C superalloy. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 62(2), pp.595-601. DOI: 10.1515/amm-2017-0088