Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Importance of Pictorial Description in Consumer Decision-Making Involving Decoys Cover

The Importance of Pictorial Description in Consumer Decision-Making Involving Decoys

By:   
Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. AHN, H. and N. V. NOVOA, 2016. The decoy effect in relative performance evaluation and the debiasing role of DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 959-967. ISSN 0377-2217.
  2. COHEN, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-8058-0283-5.
  3. FREDERICK, S. and L. LEE, 2008. Attraction, Repulsion, and Attribute Representation. In: A. Y. Lee and D. Soman, eds. NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35. Duluth: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 122-124. ISBN 0-915552-61-2.
  4. FREDERICK, S., L. LEE and E. BASKIN, 2014. The limits of attraction. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 487–507. ISSN 0022-2437.
  5. HUBER, J., J. W. PAYNE and C. PUTO, 1982. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90-98. ISSN 1537-5277.
  6. KUBALOVÁ, R. and M. KLEPEK, 2022. Brand Presence in Decision-Making Involving Decoys. Market-Tržište, 34(1), 9-24. ISSN 0353-4790.
  7. KUNCEL, N. R. and J. A. DAHLKE, 2020. Decoy effects improve diversity hiring. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 6(2), 31-37. ISSN 2377-8822.
  8. MISHRA, S., U. N. UMESH and D. E. STEM, 1993. Antecedents of the attraction effect: An information-processing approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3), 331-349. ISSN 0022-2437
  9. MONK, R. L., A. W. QURESHI, T. LEATHERBARROW and A. HUGHES, 2016. The decoy effect within alcohol purchasing decisions. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(10), 1353-1362. ISSN 1532-2491.
  10. PITTARELLO, A., M. CASEROTTI and E. RUBALTELLI, 2020. ‘Three is better than two’: Increasing donations with the attraction effect. British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 805-822. ISSN 2044-8295.
  11. SHERLIN, I., F. SISWADHI and E. SARMIGI, 2020. Analysing the Decoy Effect on Online Product Purchasing Preference: an experimental study. In: 6th Annual International Conference on Management Research 2019, pp. 125-130. ISSN 2352-5428.
  12. XIAO, Q., S. ZENG and G. FELDMAN, 2021. Revisiting the decoy effect: Replication and extension of Ariely and Wallsten (1995) and Connolly, Reb, and Kausel (2013). Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 4(2), 164-198. ISSN 2374-3611.
  13. YANG, S. and M. LYNN, 2014. More Evidence Challenging the Robustness and Usefulness of Attraction Effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 508-513. ISSN 0022-2437
  14. WU, C. and K. COSGUNER, 2020. Profiting from the Decoy Effect: A Case Study of an Online Diamond Retailer. Marketing Science, 39(5), 974-995. ISSN 1526-548X.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2023.003 | Journal eISSN: 2533-7610 | Journal ISSN: 1212-415X
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 41
Submitted on: Oct 7, 2022
Accepted on: May 17, 2023
Published on: May 18, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Radka Kubalová, published by Silesian University in Opava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.