References
- Lisa O’ Carroll, ‘UK government finds extra 1,400 laws to scrap under Rees-Mogg’s Brexit bill’ (The Guardian, 8 November 2022) <
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/08/government-finds-extra-1400-laws-scrap-rees-mogg-brexit-bill > - Petra Bárd, ‘An Analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS,’ (Verfblog, 26 November 2021) <
https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/ > - Ágoston Mohay, Á and István Szijártó, ‘Criminal procedures, preliminary references and judicial independence: A balancing act? Case C-564/19 IS.’ (2022) 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 629–640
- Vivien Judith Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth, DBE, 1966 and All That: Changing Our Minds in a Post-Brexit World. at King’s College London, 23 May 2022 <
https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/ukael-lady-rose-speech-23-May-2022.pdf > - Natalia Dřínovská and Zuzana Vikarská. Evropská zletilost českých (nejvyšších) soudů aneb prvních 18 let předběžných otázek z Brna. (2023) 31 Časopis pro pravní vědu a praxi 9–45.
- ‘European public opinion three decades after the fall of Communism’ (Pew Research Center, 14 October 2019), <
https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/the-european-union/ - Kathrin Yaromich, ‘Czechs and the EU: Does a ‘Czexit’ still have supporters?’ (expats.cz, 2 May 2022) <
https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/has-putin-brought-czechs-closer-to-eu-or-is-czexit-still-on-the-table - Jon Henley, ‘Support for leaving EU has fallen significantly across bloc since Brexit,’ (The Guardian, 12 January 2023), <
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/12/support-for-leaving-eu-has-fallen-significantly-across-bloc-since-brexit > - Eleanor Longman-Rood, ‘How Brexit made the EU stronger’ (The New European, 13 January 2023) <
https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/how-brexit-made-the-eu-stronger/ > - Alan Dashwood, ‘From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?’ (2007) 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 81
- Ceil Chenoy, ‘Horizontal Direct Effect of Directives’ (April 21, 2015) <
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2597191 - Jasper Krommendijk, ‘The interaction: dialogue or monologue?’ In National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice [Edward Elgar Publishing 2021] 111
- Paul Craig, Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [UK version, 7th edn, OUP Oxford 2020] 516
- Jasper Krommendijk, ‘Wide open and unguarded stand our gates: The CJEU and references for a preliminary ruling in purely internal situations,’ 18 German Law Journal (2017) 1359
- Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, ‘Serving Two Masters: CJEU Case Law in Swedish First Instance Courts and National Courts of Precedence As Gatekeepers’ In: Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm (eds.), The Court of Justice of the European Union: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Hart Publishing Ltds Swedish Studies in European Law 2018), 79–99
- Joshua C. Fjelstul, J.C., Matthew Gabel, and Clifford J. Carrubba, ‘The timely administration of justice: using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU’ [2022] Journal of European Public Policy 21
- Joshua C. Fjelstul, ‘How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law’ (2023) 11 Journal of Law and Courts 141–162
- Michal Bobek, ‘The Binding Force of Babel: The Enforcement of EC Law Unpublished in the Languages of the New Member States,’ 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies (2007) 43
- Nik de Boer, ‘Interview with Judge Sacha Prechal of the European Court of Justice: Part I: Working at the CJEU’ (European Law Blog, 18 December 2013) <
https://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/18/interview-with-judge-sacha-prechal-of-the-european-court-of-justice-part-i-working-at-the-cjeu/ > - Franz C. Meyer, ‘The Ultra Vires Ruling: Decontructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP decision of 5 May 2020’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 733
- Rob Van Gestel and Jurgen De Poorter, ‘Trust and Dialogue’ in In the Court We Trust: Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration between the ECJ and Supreme Administrative Courts (Cambridge University Press 2019), 145
- Urska Šadl, ‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-Accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ (2015) 8 European Journal of Legal Studies 18
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 1982, CILFIT, 283/81, EU:C:1982:335
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 October 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:359
- Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 13 March 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:112, para 67
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 October 2012, European Commission v. Czech Republic, C-37/11, EU:C:2012:640
- Czech Constitutional Court, II. ÚS 1009/08 of 8 January 2009, on the obligation of the general court to refer a preliminary question to the CJEU
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2005, Mangold, C-144/04, EU:C:2005:709
- Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 22 June 2017, Farrell, C-413/15, EU:C:2017:492
- Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 15 April 2021, Consorzio Italian Management, C-561/19, EU:C:2021:291
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 January 2023, Regiojet, C-57/21, EU:C:2023:6
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 October 1987, Foto-Frost, 314/85, EU:C:1987:452
- Judgment of the Court of 13 May 1981, International Chemical Corporation v. Amministrazione delle fianze dello Stato, 66/80, EU:C:1981:102
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1997, Dorsch Consult, C-54/96, EU:C:1997:413
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 May 2022, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2022:341
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2012, Westbahn Management, C136/11, EU:C:2012:740
- Order of the Court of Justice of 26 November 1999, ANAS, C-192/98, EU:C:1999:589
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2013, Belov, C-394/11, EU:C:2013:48
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 2021, W.Ż., C-487/19, EU:C:2021:798
- Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 16 December 2021, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2021:1018
- Order of the Court of Justice of 2 May 2022, Správa železnic, C-221/21, EU:C:2022:342
- Opinion of the Court of Justice of 18 December 2014, Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH, 2/13, EU:C:2014:2454
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 September 2003, Köbler, C-224/01, EU:C:2003:513
- Judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 2015, Léger, C-528/13, EU:C:2015:288